Skip to content

Comparison of Smoflipid to Soy-based Lipid Reduction for Cholestasis Prevention in Surgical Neonates

Comparison of Composite Lipid Emulsion Containing Fish Oil to Soy-based Lipid Reduction for Cholestasis Prevention in Neonates Requiring Abdominal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03387579
Enrollment
24
Registered
2018-01-02
Start date
2018-11-30
Completion date
2024-03-19
Last updated
2025-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholestasis of Parenteral Nutrition

Brief summary

Intestinal failure associated liver disease is a cholestatic liver disease associated with prolonged need for parenteral nutrition that can lead to such significant complications as liver failure. In the neonatal population, infants with history of intestinal resection and short bowel syndrome are at increased risk for this disease. The investigators plan to compare two possible lipid dosing preventative strategies including a composite, fish oil lipid and soy-based lipid reduction.

Detailed description

Intestinal failure associated liver disease (IFALD) is a cholestatic liver disease associated with prolonged need for parenteral nutrition. This disease can lead to such serious complications as liver failure and need for transplantation. In the neonatal population, short bowel syndrome, due to intestinal resection, is the most common cause of intestinal failure. While the exact cause is yet to be determined, it is felt the lipid component of parenteral nutrition is a large contributor to the development of this disease. Currently, there is no standard preventative strategy to attempt to decrease the risk of IFALD in the high risk, post-surgical neonatal population. The investigators aim to complete a randomized trial comparing two possible preventative strategies. One group will receive a composite lipid containing fish oil (Smoflipid) and the other group will receive soy-based lipid at reduced dosing.

Interventions

DRUGSmoflipid 20% Lipid Emulsion for Injection

Intravenous lipid containing soy, MCT, olive, and fish oils at goal doses of 3 g/kg/day

Intravenous lipid emulsion of 20% soy oil at goal doses of 1 g/kg/day

Sponsors

Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms, either composite lipid containing fish oil (Smoflipid) or soy-based lipid reduction. A third arm will include retrospective patients who will act as controls and received soy-based lipid at standard dosing.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Neonates with anticipated need for parenteral nutrition (based on primary physicians opinion) for greater than or equal to four weeks and one of the following diagnoses: * Anatomic: Neonate with intestinal atresia, omphalocele, gastroschisis, or volvulus with or without intestinal resection. * Ischemic/perforation: Neonates with spontaneous intestinal perforation or necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgical intervention.

Exclusion criteria

* Current weight less than 750 grams * AST or ALT greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal within 2 weeks of enrollment * Direct bilirubin greater than 2 mg/dL on any consecutive measurements 5 - 7 days apart within 2 weeks of enrollment * Severe coagulopathy with INR greater than 95th percentile for age (\>1.7 at less than 5 days of age, \> 1.5 older than five days of age) * Culture confirmed sepsis with positive blood, urine, or CSF culture within 2 weeks of enrollment * Renal failure requiring dialysis * Cyanotic heart disease requiring prostaglandin therapy * Hypertriglyceridemia (greater than 250mg/dL) at time of enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With CholestasisPatients were monitored during time enrolled in study for a maximum of up to 12 weeks or 84 days.Cholestasis was defined as a direct bilirubin \> 2 mg/dL on two measurements 5 to 7 days apart.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length VelocityLength was measured at enrollment, weekly during time enrolled in study, and end of study up to a maximum of 12 weeks. End and enrollment measurements were used for velocity.Length velocity was defined as the difference in length from end of study compared to enrollment divided by the number of days enrolled in study.
Head Circumference (OFC) VelocityOFC was measured at enrollment, weekly, and end of study. Enrollment and end of study measurements used for velocity.OFC velocity was calculated as difference end and start of study divided by number of days enrolled in study.
Average Total Calorie IntakeDaily calorie intake was recorded and averaged on a weekly basis for duration of study enrollment up to max of 12 weeks.Total calorie intake, including parenteral and enteral sources, were averaged on a weekly basis.
Number of Patients With Enteral Autonomy at End of StudyEnteral autonomy was recorded at the study end point for each individual patient. This end point was at time of stopping study lipid, discharge from hospital, or maximum of 12 weeks.Percentage of patients with enteral autonomy at time of leaving or stopping study was calculated. Enteral autonomy was defined as relying on enteral nutrition only for nutrition intake with no need for parenteral nutrition supplementation.
Number of Patients With Essential Fatty Acid Deficiency (EFAD)Essential fatty acid levels were measured every 4 weeks during enrollment for a maximum of up to 12 weeks.Essential fatty acid deficiency was defined as a triene to tetraene ratio greater than 0.05.
AST Change Over TimeAST was recorded at enrollment and every 2 weeks while enrolled in the study up to a maximum of 12 weeks.The change of AST over time was calculated and compared between groups. AST change was calculated as AST end - AST enrollment.
ALT Change Over TimeALT measured at enrollment and every 2 weeks for max 12 weeks.The rate of change of ALT over time was compared between groups using mixed model analysis. Change of ALT was calculated as ALT at end of study compared to ALT at enrollment.
Alkaline Phosphatase Change Over TimeAlkaline phosphatase was measured at enrollment and every 2 weeks for max of 12 weeks.Alkaline phosphatase was recorded at enrollment and every 2 weeks. The change in alkaline phosphatase was calculated as alkaline phosphatase at end minus enrollment.
Triglyceride Level Over TimeSerum triglyceride levels monitored at enrollment and weekly during time enrolled in study for a maximum of 12 weeks.All enrolled patients had serum triglyceride levels monitored at enrollment and weekly. The triglyceride level changes was calculated using values at the end of study compared to enrollment with mean and standard deviation calculated for each treatment group.
Weight VelocityPatient weight was recorded at enrollment, weekly during time enrolled, and at end of study for up to a maximum of 12 weeks. End and enrollment weights were used to calculate velocity.Weight velocity was calculated as the difference in weight from end to start of study divided by number of days enrolled in study.
Number of Patients With Retinopathy of PrematurityDiagnosis was based on diagnosis during time of initial hospitalization to level 4 NICU.The rate of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) was compared between groups. ROP was diagnosed based on ophthalmologist examination with all stages included.
Number of Patients With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) or Chronic Lung DiseaseAll patient had diagnosis of BPD documented from admission at level 4 NICU.The rate of BPD was documented and compared between groups. BPD was diagnosed based on need for respiratory support at 28 days of age. All levels of severity were included.
NICU Length of StayLength of stay will be calculated based on documenting each patient's admission date and date leaving the NICU.The length of stay at the level 4 NICU was compared between groups.
Three Year Development- CommunicationASQ was completed during the third year of life from 3 years 0 days to 3 years 364 days of chronologic age.During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores show improved outcomes. Scores are separated into on schedule, monitoring zone, and below cutoff. These thresholds vary by aged screened. Possible screens used for this age group include 36 months, 42 months, and 48 months dependent on exact chronologic age screen completed. At 36 months communication 45-60 is on schedule; 35-40 monitoring, and \<35 below cutoff. For 42 months on schedule 40-60; monitoring 30-35; below cutoff \<35. For 48 months on schedule 45-60; monitoring 35-40; below cutoff \<35.
Three Year Development: Gross Motorthree year chronological age 3 years and 0 days to 3 years and 364 daysDuring the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores indicate improved outcome, there are three possible scoring categories on schedule (normal), monitoring zone, below cutoff. Score thresholds by possible screens include: 36 months on schedule 50-60; monitoring 40-45; below cutoff \<40. 42 months on schedule 50-60; monitoring 40-45; below cutoff \<40. 48 months on schedule 45-60; monitoring 35-40; below cutoff \<35.
Three Year Development: Fine Motorthree year chronological age (3 years and 0 days to 3 years and 364 days)During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores show improved outcomes with three scoring categories: on schedule (normal), monitoring zone, and below cutoff. These thresholds vary by each category and screening age. Based on the possible screens for chronological age the score categories are: 36 months: 35-60 on schedule; 20-30 monitoring; \<20 below cutoff. 42 months: 35-60 on schedule; 20-30 monitoring; \<20 below cutoff. 48 months: 35-60 on schedule; 20-30 monitoring; \<20 below cutoff.
Three Year Development: Problem Solvingthree year chronological age (3 years and 0 days to 3 years and 364 days)During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores indicate improved outcomes with three possible score categories: on schedule (normal), monitoring zone, and below cutoff. Category thresholds vary by outcome category and age of screen. There are three possible screens that were used for this population, chosen based on chronologic age. The score categories based on age are: 36 months: 45-60 on schedule; 35-40 monitoring; \<35 below cutoff. 42 months: 40-60 on schdule; 30-35 monitoring; \<30 below cutoff. 48 months: 45-60 on schedule; 35-40 monitoring; \<35 below cutoff
Three Year Development: Personal Socialthree year chronological age (3 years and 0 days to 3 years and 364 days)During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores indicate improved outcomes with three score categories possible including on schedule (normal), monitoring zone, and below cutoff. These thresholds vary based on outcome measure and age of screen completed. Screen used depends on chronological age at screen. Score thresholds for each age include: 36 months: 45-60 on schedule; 35-40 monitoring; \<35 below cutoff. 42 months: 45-60 on schedule; 35-40 monitoring; \<35 below cutoff. 48 months: 40-60 on schedule; 30-40 monitoring; \<30 below cutoff.
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Over TimeGGT was measured at enrollment and every 2 weeks while enrolled in the study for a maximum of up to 12 weeks.GGT was documented at baseline and regularly intervals with level compared over time between groups. GGT was compared by treatment group for levels at end of study and enrollment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were eligible for enrollment if they were admitted to the level IV NICU, required abdominal surgery, and needed TPN. Patients were excluded if they had signs of liver disease at baseline. Informed consent was obtained, and once screening lab work completed patients were randomized into one of two prospective treatment groups. Historic controls were included from previous two years prior to enrollment with selection based on same eligibility criteria.

Pre-assignment details

Screening labs including AST, ALT, GGT, platelet count, INR, and triglyceride level were performed prior to or at enrollment. Results were required prior to randomization. Only one patient was enrolled but found to have abnormal INR so was not randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Smoflipid 20%
Smoflipid 20% is an intravenous lipid emulsions containing soy, MCT, olive, and fish oils. Patients randomized to this arm received the composite fish oil lipid, Smoflipid 20%, at dosing goal of 3 g/kg/day. Patients were started on a dose of 1 g/kg/day and titrated by 1g/kg/day up to goal. As enteral nutrition was advanced the lipid dose was weaned per study protocol and dietary recommendations. Smoflipid was infused over a 24 hour period, with infusion changed every 12 hours per hospital policy.
12
Intralipid 20% Reduction
Intralipid 20% is an intravenous lipid emulsion containing soybean oil. Patients randomized to this arm received soy-based lipid (Intralipid 20%) at a goal dose of 1 g/kg/day. Lipid was increased incrementally by 0.5 g/kg/day every 3-5 days for growth less than goal of 25-30 g/kg/day despite maximization or remaining TPN components. Once adequate weight gain was established Intralipid was weaned back to goal of 1 g/kg/day by 0.5-1 g/kg/day increments. With enteral feeding advancement Intralipid was continued at 1 g/kg/day until TPN is stopped. Intralipid was infused over a 24 hour period, with infusion changed every 12 hours per hospital policy.
12
Intralipid 20% Historic
A control group of historic patients who received Intralipid 20% at dosing of greater than or equal to 2 g/kg/day were included. Patients were enrolled using the same eligibility criteria as prospective patients. Given patients were retrospective, only available data in the patient electronic medical record was recorded.
24
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSmoflipid 20%Intralipid 20% ReductionIntralipid 20% HistoricTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants48 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous4 days5 days2 days3.5 days
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants12 Participants22 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants8 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants11 Participants13 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants12 participants24 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants5 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants7 Participants15 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 126 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 122 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Cholestasis

Cholestasis was defined as a direct bilirubin \> 2 mg/dL on two measurements 5 to 7 days apart.

Time frame: Patients were monitored during time enrolled in study for a maximum of up to 12 weeks or 84 days.

Population: All participants who received study lipid or were included as historic controls.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Smoflipid 20%Number of Participants With Cholestasis1 Participants
Intralipid 20% ReductionNumber of Participants With Cholestasis3 Participants
Intralipid 20% HistoricNumber of Participants With Cholestasis7 Participants
p-value: 0.59Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.224Fisher Exact
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Alkaline Phosphatase Change Over Time

Alkaline phosphatase was recorded at enrollment and every 2 weeks. The change in alkaline phosphatase was calculated as alkaline phosphatase at end minus enrollment.

Time frame: Alkaline phosphatase was measured at enrollment and every 2 weeks for max of 12 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Alkaline Phosphatase Change Over Time107.0 units per literStandard Deviation 146.9
Intralipid 20% ReductionAlkaline Phosphatase Change Over Time166.1 units per literStandard Deviation 126.6
Intralipid 20% HistoricAlkaline Phosphatase Change Over Time150.2 units per literStandard Deviation 139.9
p-value: 0.006Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.305Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

ALT Change Over Time

The rate of change of ALT over time was compared between groups using mixed model analysis. Change of ALT was calculated as ALT at end of study compared to ALT at enrollment.

Time frame: ALT measured at enrollment and every 2 weeks for max 12 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%ALT Change Over Time8.7 units per literStandard Deviation 14.9
Intralipid 20% ReductionALT Change Over Time25.3 units per literStandard Deviation 53.3
Intralipid 20% HistoricALT Change Over Time17.2 units per literStandard Deviation 51.7
p-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.27Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.034Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

AST Change Over Time

The change of AST over time was calculated and compared between groups. AST change was calculated as AST end - AST enrollment.

Time frame: AST was recorded at enrollment and every 2 weeks while enrolled in the study up to a maximum of 12 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%AST Change Over Time-8.3 units per literStandard Deviation 25.5
Intralipid 20% ReductionAST Change Over Time2.9 units per literStandard Deviation 62.4
Intralipid 20% HistoricAST Change Over Time5.1 units per literStandard Deviation 49.8
p-value: 0.046Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.04Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.718Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Average Total Calorie Intake

Total calorie intake, including parenteral and enteral sources, were averaged on a weekly basis.

Time frame: Daily calorie intake was recorded and averaged on a weekly basis for duration of study enrollment up to max of 12 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Average Total Calorie Intake114.0 kcal per kilograms per dayStandard Deviation 9.1
Intralipid 20% ReductionAverage Total Calorie Intake101.9 kcal per kilograms per dayStandard Deviation 10.5
Intralipid 20% HistoricAverage Total Calorie Intake109.1 kcal per kilograms per dayStandard Deviation 8.3
p-value: 0.008Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Over Time

GGT was documented at baseline and regularly intervals with level compared over time between groups. GGT was compared by treatment group for levels at end of study and enrollment.

Time frame: GGT was measured at enrollment and every 2 weeks while enrolled in the study for a maximum of up to 12 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Over Time-0.8 units per literStandard Deviation 99.7
Intralipid 20% ReductionGamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Over Time55.7 units per literStandard Deviation 73.3
Intralipid 20% HistoricGamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Over Time37.3 units per literStandard Deviation 121.7
p-value: 0.379Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.717Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.576Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Head Circumference (OFC) Velocity

OFC velocity was calculated as difference end and start of study divided by number of days enrolled in study.

Time frame: OFC was measured at enrollment, weekly, and end of study. Enrollment and end of study measurements used for velocity.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Head Circumference (OFC) Velocity0.09 centimeters per dayStandard Deviation 0.03
Intralipid 20% ReductionHead Circumference (OFC) Velocity0.07 centimeters per dayStandard Deviation 0.06
Intralipid 20% HistoricHead Circumference (OFC) Velocity0.10 centimeters per dayStandard Deviation 0.05
p-value: 0.753Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Length Velocity

Length velocity was defined as the difference in length from end of study compared to enrollment divided by the number of days enrolled in study.

Time frame: Length was measured at enrollment, weekly during time enrolled in study, and end of study up to a maximum of 12 weeks. End and enrollment measurements were used for velocity.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Length Velocity0.13 centimeters per dayStandard Deviation 0.08
Intralipid 20% ReductionLength Velocity0.09 centimeters per dayStandard Deviation 0.65
Intralipid 20% HistoricLength Velocity0.10 centimeters per dayStandard Deviation 0.08
p-value: 0.525Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

NICU Length of Stay

The length of stay at the level 4 NICU was compared between groups.

Time frame: Length of stay will be calculated based on documenting each patient's admission date and date leaving the NICU.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%NICU Length of Stay72.2 daysStandard Deviation 57.6
Intralipid 20% ReductionNICU Length of Stay33.3 daysStandard Deviation 46
Intralipid 20% HistoricNICU Length of Stay40.2 daysStandard Deviation 42.2
p-value: 0.211Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Number of Patients With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) or Chronic Lung Disease

The rate of BPD was documented and compared between groups. BPD was diagnosed based on need for respiratory support at 28 days of age. All levels of severity were included.

Time frame: All patient had diagnosis of BPD documented from admission at level 4 NICU.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Smoflipid 20%Number of Patients With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) or Chronic Lung Disease2 Participants
Intralipid 20% ReductionNumber of Patients With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) or Chronic Lung Disease2 Participants
Intralipid 20% HistoricNumber of Patients With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) or Chronic Lung Disease5 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.64Fisher Exact
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With Enteral Autonomy at End of Study

Percentage of patients with enteral autonomy at time of leaving or stopping study was calculated. Enteral autonomy was defined as relying on enteral nutrition only for nutrition intake with no need for parenteral nutrition supplementation.

Time frame: Enteral autonomy was recorded at the study end point for each individual patient. This end point was at time of stopping study lipid, discharge from hospital, or maximum of 12 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Smoflipid 20%Number of Patients With Enteral Autonomy at End of Study9 Participants
Intralipid 20% ReductionNumber of Patients With Enteral Autonomy at End of Study10 Participants
Intralipid 20% HistoricNumber of Patients With Enteral Autonomy at End of Study23 Participants
p-value: 0.127Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With Essential Fatty Acid Deficiency (EFAD)

Essential fatty acid deficiency was defined as a triene to tetraene ratio greater than 0.05.

Time frame: Essential fatty acid levels were measured every 4 weeks during enrollment for a maximum of up to 12 weeks.

Population: Only prospective participants were included in this analysis as retrospective controls did not have essential fatty acid levels obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Smoflipid 20%Number of Patients With Essential Fatty Acid Deficiency (EFAD)0 Participants
Intralipid 20% ReductionNumber of Patients With Essential Fatty Acid Deficiency (EFAD)1 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With Retinopathy of Prematurity

The rate of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) was compared between groups. ROP was diagnosed based on ophthalmologist examination with all stages included.

Time frame: Diagnosis was based on diagnosis during time of initial hospitalization to level 4 NICU.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Smoflipid 20%Number of Patients With Retinopathy of Prematurity2 Participants
Intralipid 20% ReductionNumber of Patients With Retinopathy of Prematurity1 Participants
Intralipid 20% HistoricNumber of Patients With Retinopathy of Prematurity3 Participants
Comparison: ROPp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: ROPp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Three Year Development- Communication

During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores show improved outcomes. Scores are separated into on schedule, monitoring zone, and below cutoff. These thresholds vary by aged screened. Possible screens used for this age group include 36 months, 42 months, and 48 months dependent on exact chronologic age screen completed. At 36 months communication 45-60 is on schedule; 35-40 monitoring, and \<35 below cutoff. For 42 months on schedule 40-60; monitoring 30-35; below cutoff \<35. For 48 months on schedule 45-60; monitoring 35-40; below cutoff \<35.

Time frame: ASQ was completed during the third year of life from 3 years 0 days to 3 years 364 days of chronologic age.

Population: Only the prospective patients treated by the research team were included in developmental assessment. The Intralipid 20% Historic group was not included in analysis as these patients were not treated by the research team and developmental screening could not be performed on these patients. Data for the Intralipid 20% Historic arm was not collected as specified by the study protocol and statistical analysis plan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Three Year Development- Communication40.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
Intralipid 20% ReductionThree Year Development- Communication41.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
p-value: 0.72Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Three Year Development: Fine Motor

During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores show improved outcomes with three scoring categories: on schedule (normal), monitoring zone, and below cutoff. These thresholds vary by each category and screening age. Based on the possible screens for chronological age the score categories are: 36 months: 35-60 on schedule; 20-30 monitoring; \<20 below cutoff. 42 months: 35-60 on schedule; 20-30 monitoring; \<20 below cutoff. 48 months: 35-60 on schedule; 20-30 monitoring; \<20 below cutoff.

Time frame: three year chronological age (3 years and 0 days to 3 years and 364 days)

Population: Only the prospective patients treated by the research team were included in developmental assessment. The Intralipid 20% Historic group was not included in analysis as these patients were not treated by the research team and developmental screening could not be performed on these patients. Data for the Intralipid 20% Historic arm was not collected as specified by the study protocol and statistical analysis plan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Three Year Development: Fine Motor32.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
Intralipid 20% ReductionThree Year Development: Fine Motor34.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
p-value: 0.774t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Three Year Development: Gross Motor

During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores indicate improved outcome, there are three possible scoring categories on schedule (normal), monitoring zone, below cutoff. Score thresholds by possible screens include: 36 months on schedule 50-60; monitoring 40-45; below cutoff \<40. 42 months on schedule 50-60; monitoring 40-45; below cutoff \<40. 48 months on schedule 45-60; monitoring 35-40; below cutoff \<35.

Time frame: three year chronological age 3 years and 0 days to 3 years and 364 days

Population: Only the prospective patients treated by the research team were included in developmental assessment. The Intralipid 20% Historic group was not included in analysis as these patients were not treated by the research team and developmental screening could not be performed on these patients. Data for the Intralipid 20% Historic arm was not collected as specified by the study protocol and statistical analysis plan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Three Year Development: Gross Motor43.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Intralipid 20% ReductionThree Year Development: Gross Motor54.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.19
p-value: 0.5Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Three Year Development: Personal Social

During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores indicate improved outcomes with three score categories possible including on schedule (normal), monitoring zone, and below cutoff. These thresholds vary based on outcome measure and age of screen completed. Screen used depends on chronological age at screen. Score thresholds for each age include: 36 months: 45-60 on schedule; 35-40 monitoring; \<35 below cutoff. 42 months: 45-60 on schedule; 35-40 monitoring; \<35 below cutoff. 48 months: 40-60 on schedule; 30-40 monitoring; \<30 below cutoff.

Time frame: three year chronological age (3 years and 0 days to 3 years and 364 days)

Population: Only the prospective patients treated by the research team were included in developmental assessment. The Intralipid 20% Historic group was not included in analysis as these patients were not treated by the research team and developmental screening could not be performed on these patients. Data for the Intralipid 20% Historic arm was not collected as specified by the study protocol and statistical analysis plan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Three Year Development: Personal Social46.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Intralipid 20% ReductionThree Year Development: Personal Social47.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
p-value: 0.475Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Three Year Development: Problem Solving

During the third year of chronological age an Ages and Stages questionnaire (ASQ) was completed by the parents. For each section the range of score possible is 0-60. Higher scores indicate improved outcomes with three possible score categories: on schedule (normal), monitoring zone, and below cutoff. Category thresholds vary by outcome category and age of screen. There are three possible screens that were used for this population, chosen based on chronologic age. The score categories based on age are: 36 months: 45-60 on schedule; 35-40 monitoring; \<35 below cutoff. 42 months: 40-60 on schdule; 30-35 monitoring; \<30 below cutoff. 48 months: 45-60 on schedule; 35-40 monitoring; \<35 below cutoff

Time frame: three year chronological age (3 years and 0 days to 3 years and 364 days)

Population: Only the prospective patients treated by the research team were included in developmental assessment. The Intralipid 20% Historic group was not included in analysis as these patients were not treated by the research team and developmental screening could not be performed on these patients. Data for the Intralipid 20% Historic arm was not collected as specified by the study protocol and statistical analysis plan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Three Year Development: Problem Solving47.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Intralipid 20% ReductionThree Year Development: Problem Solving47.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
p-value: 0.457Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Triglyceride Level Over Time

All enrolled patients had serum triglyceride levels monitored at enrollment and weekly. The triglyceride level changes was calculated using values at the end of study compared to enrollment with mean and standard deviation calculated for each treatment group.

Time frame: Serum triglyceride levels monitored at enrollment and weekly during time enrolled in study for a maximum of 12 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Triglyceride Level Over Time-18.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31
Intralipid 20% ReductionTriglyceride Level Over Time013.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 54.5
Intralipid 20% HistoricTriglyceride Level Over Time13.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 48
p-value: 0.835Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.799Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.714Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Weight Velocity

Weight velocity was calculated as the difference in weight from end to start of study divided by number of days enrolled in study.

Time frame: Patient weight was recorded at enrollment, weekly during time enrolled, and at end of study for up to a maximum of 12 weeks. End and enrollment weights were used to calculate velocity.

Population: All participants included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Smoflipid 20%Weight Velocity28.6 grams per dayStandard Deviation 10.6
Intralipid 20% ReductionWeight Velocity23.0 grams per dayStandard Deviation 11.9
Intralipid 20% HistoricWeight Velocity24.6 grams per dayStandard Deviation 8.2
p-value: 0.471Kruskal-Wallis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026