Skip to content

Efficacy and Bone Safety of Sotagliflozin 400 and 200 mg Versus Placebo in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control

A 26-week Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study With a 78-week Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Bone Safety of Sotagliflozin in Patients 55 Years or Older With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03386344
Acronym
SOTA-BONE
Enrollment
376
Registered
2017-12-29
Start date
2018-02-19
Completion date
2020-05-30
Last updated
2021-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of Sotagliflozin 400 milligrams (mg) versus placebo with respect to hemoglobin A1c (Hb1Ac) reduction in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who have inadequate glycemic control on diet and exercise only or with a stable antidiabetes regimen.

Detailed description

Study duration per participant is approximately 110 weeks (Screening period of up to 2 weeks, 2 week single-blind run-in period), a 26-week double-blind core treatment period, a 78-week double-blind extension period, and a 2- week post treatment follow up period. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans will be performed to assess Bone Mineral Density and Fat vs. Lean body mass at baseline and Weeks 26, 52, and 104.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral

DRUGSotagliflozin

Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Participants with T2D managed with diet and exercise only or with a stable antidiabetes regimen (in monotherapy or combination therapy that can include oral antidiabetes medications, insulin, or glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists) for more than 12 weeks. * Participants has given written informed consent to participate in the study in accordance with local regulations.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<55 years. * Women who have been postmenopausal (or undergone bilateral oophorectomy) for less than 5 years. * Type 1 diabetes mellitus. * Body mass index (BMI) ≤20 or \>45 kilogram per meter square kg/m\^2 or bodyweight that exceeds the weight limits of the DXA scanner. * Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) \<7.0% or HbA1c \>11.0%. * Use of a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor or thiazolidinedione within 24 months. * Bone mineral density (BMD) T- score \<-2.0 at any site (ie, lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck). * History of fracture within 12 months (except for fractures of the hand/fingers, foot/toes, facial bones, and skull). * Treatment with medications known to affect bone mass or modify the risk of fractures within 36 months (eg, bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, calcitonin, teriparatide, denosumab, strontium ranelate, growth hormone, aromatase inhibitors, androgen deprivation therapy, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital). Use of hormonal replacement that includes systemic or transdermal estrogen or testosterone is excluded unless is stable for at least 24 months prior to Screening. * Lower extremity complications (such as skin ulcers, infection, osteomyelitis and gangrene) identified during the Screening period, and still requiring treatment at randomization. * Uncontrolled high blood pressure, severe anemia, severe cardiovascular problems, such as heart failure, active cancer, or other conditions that the Investigator believes with result in a short life expectancy. * Renal disease as defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 milliliter per minute (mL/min)/1.73 meter square (m\^2) at the Screening Visit by the 4 variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26Baseline to Week 26An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model is used for analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Week 26Baseline to Week 26An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Femoral Neck at Week 26Baseline to Week 26An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26Baseline to Week 26An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Week 26Baseline to Week 26An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 12Baseline to Week 12An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.0% at Week 26Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)up to 106 weeksAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26Baseline to Week 26An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 53 investigative sites in the United States, Australia, Canada, Korea, Republic of Mexico, New Zealand, Russian Federation, and Taiwan from 19 February 2018 to 30 May 2020.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), were enrolled in 1 of 3 treatment groups: Placebo, Sotagliflozin 200 milligrams (mg) or Sotagliflozin 400 mg.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Following a 2 week run-in period, participants were randomized to matching placebo to sotagliflozin administered as 2 tablets, once daily, before the first meal of the day, for up to 26 weeks in the Core Treatment Period. Participants were eligible to continue treatment in the Extension Period. The total treatment duration was planned for up to 106 weeks.
126
Sotagliflozin 200 mg
Following a 2 week run-in period, participants were randomized to Sotagliflozin 200 mg administered as 1 sotagliflozin tablet and 1 matching placebo tablet, once daily, before the first meal of the day, for up to 26 weeks in the Core Treatment Period. Participants were eligible to continue treatment in the Extension Period. The total treatment duration was planned for up to 104 weeks.
125
Sotagliflozin 400 mg
Following a 2 week run-in period, participants were randomized to Sotagliflozin 400 mg administered as two 200 mg sotagliflozin tablets, once daily, before the first meal of the day, for up to 26 weeks in the Core Treatment Period. Participants were eligible to continue treatment in the Extension Period. The total treatment duration was planned for up to 104 weeks.
125
Total376

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event631
Overall StudyAt the Participant's own Request778
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up321
Overall StudyPoor Compliance to Protocol010
Overall StudyReason not Specified010
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor101102106

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSotagliflozin 400 mgSotagliflozin 200 mgPlacebo
Age, Continuous66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
BMD T-score: Femoral Neck-0.60 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93
-0.46 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03
-0.66 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
-0.69 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86
BMD T-score: Total Hip0.12 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04
0.24 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.17
0.00 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
0.13 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-score: Lumbar Spine0.76 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82
0.88 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71
0.70 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74
0.69 t-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
67 Participants23 Participants21 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
308 Participants102 Participants104 Participants102 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)8.34 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94
8.32 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.95
8.32 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
8.38 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
6 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
75 Participants24 Participants25 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
22 Participants6 Participants8 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
263 Participants88 Participants87 Participants88 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
13 participants3 participants8 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
57 participants20 participants17 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
47 participants17 participants14 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
29 participants11 participants9 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
50 participants19 participants14 participants17 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
24 participants7 participants9 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
28 participants7 participants9 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
128 participants41 participants45 participants42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
167 Participants55 Participants56 Participants56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
209 Participants70 Participants69 Participants70 Participants
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)133.06 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.88
134.65 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.74
131.48 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.69
133.04 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1250 / 1250 / 125
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 12567 / 12568 / 125
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 12510 / 1259 / 125

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26

An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model is used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 26

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants, irrespective of compliance with the study protocol and procedures. Missing data are imputed using washout imputation method under the missing not at random framework.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26-0.22 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.08
Sotagliflozin 200 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26-0.66 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.077
Sotagliflozin 400 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26-0.67 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.079
Comparison: The change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline HbA1c as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.649, -0.25]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline HbA1c as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.634, -0.235]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26

An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 26

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants, irrespective of compliance with the study protocol and procedures. Missing data are imputed using washout imputation method under the missing not at random framework.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26-0.46 kilogram (kg)Standard Error 0.261
Sotagliflozin 200 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26-2.37 kilogram (kg)Standard Error 0.258
Sotagliflozin 400 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26-2.16 kilogram (kg)Standard Error 0.264
Comparison: The change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline body weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.568, -1.252]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline body weight as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.36, -1.046]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26

An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 26

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants, irrespective of compliance with the study protocol and procedures. Missing data are imputed using washout imputation method under the missing not at random framework.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26-7.274 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.6064
Sotagliflozin 200 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26-26.165 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.4656
Sotagliflozin 400 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26-28.607 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.5912
Comparison: The change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, baseline fasting plasma glucose as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-27.8605, -9.9205]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, baseline fasting plasma glucose as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-30.3294, -12.336]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 12

An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants, irrespective of compliance with the study protocol and procedures. Missing data are imputed using washout imputation method under the missing not at random framework.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 12-0.80 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.149
Sotagliflozin 200 mgChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 12-1.61 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.13
Sotagliflozin 400 mgChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 12-1.97 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.165
Comparison: The change from baseline to Week 12 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline SBP as a covariate.p-value: 0.586495% CI: [-3.705, 2.095]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline to Week 12 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline SBP as a covariate.p-value: 0.431595% CI: [-4.058, 1.734]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Time frame: up to 106 weeks

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)80.0 percentage of participants
Sotagliflozin 200 mgPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)82.4 percentage of participants
Sotagliflozin 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)82.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.0% at Week 26

Time frame: Week 26

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants, irrespective of compliance with the study protocol and procedures.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.0% at Week 269.5 percentage of participants
Sotagliflozin 200 mgPercentage of Participants With Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.0% at Week 2620.0 percentage of participants
Sotagliflozin 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.0% at Week 2621.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Percentage difference between treatment groups from randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening and randomization strata of sex (male, female) using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights.p-value: 0.017295% CI: [1.78, 19.23]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Percentage difference between treatment groups from randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening and randomization strata of sex (male, female) using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights.p-value: 0.007695% CI: [3.23, 20.86]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Femoral Neck at Week 26

An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 26

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of IMP. Missing data are imputed using a pattern-based imputation method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Femoral Neck at Week 26-0.94 percent changeStandard Error 0.379
Sotagliflozin 200 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Femoral Neck at Week 26-0.20 percent changeStandard Error 0.332
Sotagliflozin 400 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Femoral Neck at Week 26-0.62 percent changeStandard Error 0.338
Comparison: Percent change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline BMD as a covariate.p-value: 0.10595% CI: [-0.157, 1.654]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percent change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline BMD as a covariate.p-value: 0.480495% CI: [-0.577, 1.226]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Week 26

An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 26

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP). Missing data are imputed using a pattern-based imputation method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Week 260.37 percent changeStandard Error 0.327
Sotagliflozin 200 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Week 260.13 percent changeStandard Error 0.323
Sotagliflozin 400 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Week 260.22 percent changeStandard Error 0.327
Comparison: Percent change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline BMD as a covariate.p-value: 0.570795% CI: [-1.07, 0.59]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percent change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline BMD as a covariate.p-value: 0.724795% CI: [-0.969, 0.674]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Week 26

An ANCOVA model is used for analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 26

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of IMP. Missing data are imputed using a pattern-based imputation method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Week 26-0.36 percent changeStandard Error 0.259
Sotagliflozin 200 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Week 26-0.22 percent changeStandard Error 0.22
Sotagliflozin 400 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Week 26-0.16 percent changeStandard Error 0.223
Comparison: Percent change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline lumbar spine as a covariate.p-value: 0.645495% CI: [-0.462, 0.745]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percent change from baseline to Week 26 was analyzed using ANCOVA model with treatment groups, randomization strata of HbA1c (≤8.5, \>8.5%) at screening, randomization strata of sex (male, female), and country as fixed effects, and baseline lumbar spine as a covariate.p-value: 0.528995% CI: [-0.41, 0.798]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026