Skip to content

A Comparison of CBTi and Usual Treatment for Tinnitus Related Insomnia

A Comparison of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Insomnia (CBTi) and Usual Audiological Rehabilitation in the Management of Tinnitus Related Insomnia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03386123
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-12-29
Start date
2017-06-28
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2019-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insomnia, Tinnitus

Keywords

Tinnitus, Insomnia, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Brief summary

There is evidence that CBT for insomnia (CBTi) is an effective treatment for sleep disturbance both as a primary problem and when co-morbid with other health problems, such as chronic pain. This study will investigate the effectiveness of CBTi as a treatment for tinnitus related insomnia. Tinnitus patients reporting clinically significant insomnia will be offered sleep-specific treatment. Six sessions of CBTi will be offered to one group of patients and 2 sessions standard audiological care (psycho-education and sleep hygiene) will be offered to another group. Both groups will be offered sound enrichment at night. In order to take account of the possible effects of clinical contact a third group will be offered 6 sessions of support without a focused tinnitus or sleep intervention. Accepted measures of sleep disturbance will be used as well as measures of tinnitus complaint. All treatment/contact will be provided at the Royal National Throat Nose & Ear Hospital. Participants will be involved in the study (inc. baseline period {2 weeks}, intervention {8 weeks} and follow-ups {4 and 20 weeks}) for 34 weeks.

Interventions

Continuous maintenance of sleep diary, cognitive behaviour therapy, including cognitive restructuring, and behavioural change focusing on sleep restriction and safety behaviours.

BEHAVIORALStandard Audiological Care

Maintenance of sleep diary at key times. Psycho-education, provision of bedside sound generator.

BEHAVIORALSleep Support Group

Maintenance of sleep diary at key times. Social support focused on tinnitus and sleep problems.

Sponsors

British Tinnitus Association
CollaboratorOTHER
University College, London
CollaboratorOTHER
University College London Hospitals
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least moderately distressing tinnitus (above a set minimum score on the Mini TQ) for at least six months and problematic insomnia (above a set minimum score on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and for tinnitus related insomnia to be identified in clinical interview) as result of tinnitus, for at least three months. * Patient wishes to work on improving sleep. * Sufficient understanding of English and sufficient hearing ability to take part in for group discussions and to complete questionnaires. * Patient has had tinnitus assessed by a doctor and an audiological specialist. * Willing and able to provide written consent. Able to regularly attend clinic in London, United Kingdom.

Exclusion criteria

* • Organic sleep disorders present (e.g. Obstructive Sleep Apnoea, delayed phase sleep, etc.) assessed with a subscale of the hospital sleep unit's sleep disorder and snoring proforma. * Currently pregnant, planning pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Alcohol or drug dependent. * Currently suffering with severe mental illness (psychosis, severe anxiety or mood disorder). * Reports active risk to themselves or others. Still undergoing medical investigations into sleep and / or tinnitus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups7-item questionnaire, each item rates 0 - 4. Total scores range from 0-28 with higher scores indicating more severity.
Change in the amount of sleep obtainedA 2-week sleep diary will be kept 2 weeks prior to the first and last treatment sessions and to the 1 and 6 month follow-ups.Average of all of the following metrics obtained from 2 weeks of sleep diary measure: Sleep Onset Latency - lower score indicates better sleep; Wake Time After Sleep Onset - lower score indicate better sleep; Number of night time awakenings - lower scores indicate better sleep; Total Sleep Time - higher scores indicate better sleep; Time in Bed - included only so that Sleep Efficiency can be calculated: Sleep Efficiency (Total Sleep Time / Time in Bed x 100) - higher scores indicate better sleep. Diary measures for sleep quality (0= worst possible to 10=best possible), tinnitus annoyance (0= not at all to 10= extremely), refreshed at waking (0= not at all to 10= very refreshed) and quality of day time functioning (0= very poor to 10= very good).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Tinnitus Catastrophizing Scale scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups13-item questionnaire scored on a 0-4 scale. Total sum of scores range from 0 - 52. Higher scores indicate higher levels of catastrophizing.
Mini Tinnitus Questionnaire scoreScreeningConstruct: Tinnitus complaint 12-item questionnaire scored on a 0 - 2 scale. Total sum of scores range 0-24. Higher scores indicate presence of tinnitus. A score of 8 or more indicates the presence of a clinical level of tinnitus-related distress.
Change in the Tinnitus Questionnaire scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-upsConstruct: Tinnitus complaint 41-item questionnaire scored on a 0 - 2 scale. Total sum of scores ranges from 0-82; higher scores indicate presence of tinnitus. The reliable change criterion is 11.08.
Change in subjective measure of tinnitus loudnessAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-upsVisual Analogue Scale from 0mm to 100mm; higher scores indicate greater loudness of tinnitus.
Change in Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-upsConstruct: general psychological distress 34-item questionnaire scored on a 0-4 scale. The average of all the scores is calculated and then multiplied by 10, so the scores can range from 0 to 40; a clinical cut-off score is 10 and clinically significant change is 5.
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups10-item questionnaire. Sum of 7 components; global score range 0 - 21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups7-items questionnaire scored on a 0-3 scale; total sum of scores ranges from total score range: 0-21 with higher score indicating more severe anxiety.
Change in EuroQOL scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-upsConstruct: health status (dimensions: mobility, self-care, performing usual activities, pain or discomfort; anxiety or depression); each state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code; The answers given to EQ-5D allow 243 unique health states to be identified and can be converted into EQ-5D index and utility scores anchored at 0 for death and 1 for perfect health. The EQ-5D questionnaire also includes a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), by which respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
Change in Work and Social Adjustment Scale scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-upsConstruct: impaired functioning 5-item questionnaire scored on a 0-8 scale; total sums of scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.
Satisfaction and feedbackAt the end of treatment and at six month follow-up pointQuestionnaire asking individuals to rate the following on a 0 - 10 scale (from not at all to extremely) How useful was treatment? How relevant was treatment? How acceptable was treatment? They are also asked to provide qualitative feedback in the form of comments in response to questions about what changes they have noticed, what aspects of treatment were most and least useful, what they would have liked to be different and any other comments.
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-upsConstruct: Depression 9-item questionnaire scored on a 0-3 scale; total sum of scores ranges from 0-27 with higher scores indicate greater depression severity.
Change in Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep Questionnaire - abbreviated version (DBAS-16) scoreAt first and last treatment sessions and at 1 and 6 month follow-ups16-item questionnaire scored on a 0-10 scale. The average score is calculated from all individual scores and ranges from 0-10; higher scores indicate more dysfunctional / unrealistic beliefs about / sleep.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026