Skip to content

Optimal Prostate Study

Optimal Prostate Fractionation Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03386045
Enrollment
503
Registered
2017-12-29
Start date
2018-10-02
Completion date
2028-08-01
Last updated
2026-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

To compare the toxicity, rate of local control, biochemical failure rate and quality of life of three different radiotherapy techniques (moderate hypofractionation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and standard radiotherapy plus 2 fractions of SBRT (BOOSTER)

Detailed description

Participants must have histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma, good performance status and suitable for high dose radiotherapy. There are two groups of participants: Group 1: eligible participants will be randomised to have either moderate hypofractionation or standard radiotherapy plus SBRT (BOOSTER). Participants in this group must be able to have MRI, prostate fiducial markers (gold markers)and hydrogel insertion. Fiducial markers will be used to locate the prostate accurately during radiation treatment. Hydrogel is a temporary gel being injected into the space between the prostate and rectum to reduce the dose of radiation received by the rectum to minimise side effects from the treatment. Group 2: eligible participants will be randomised to have either moderate hypofractionation or SBRT. Participants will be reviewed for side effects. A Safety Committee will be formed containing multi-disciplinary team members. All serious adverse will be reported to the principal investigator and Human Research Ethics Committee within 24 hours.

Interventions

RADIATIONOptimal SBRT

Two thirds of the participants in this group will get the SBRT (5 treatments) and one third will get standard treatment (60 Gy in 20 treatments)

RADIATIONOptimal Booster

Two thirds of the participants in this group will get the two high precision radiotherapy plus 20 doses of standard external beam radiotherapy (ie the "Booster approach\|") and one third will get the standard treatment (60 Gy in 20 treatments)

Sponsors

Royal North Shore Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

no masking

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma * PSA obtained within three months prior to enrolment * ECOG performance status 0 to 2 * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written consent * Suitable for high dose irradiation to the prostate To be eligible for the arm containing Stereotactic Booster alone approach patient must have the following * No contraindication to MRI such as pacemaker and severe claustrophobia * Patient must be able to have fiducial markers placed in the prostate * Patient must be able to have hydrogel insertion at the same time as fiducial markers * Must have IPSS less than 15

Exclusion criteria

* Previous pelvic radiotherapy * Prior total prostatectomy * Unwilling or unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
local control12 months post radiotherapythe rate of local control as determined on PSMA scanning

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biological failure rate3 year and 5 yearThe rate of biochemical failure defined as Nadir+2.0 biochemical failure defined as Nadir+2.0
late toxicitymore than three months after treatment completion.Late Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicity (modified RTOG scale)
Markerless tracking technologyDuring radiotherapy treatmentMarkerless tracking algorithms will be assessed for accuracy against marker-based localisation by masking the markers and directly comparing the determined trajectories
Accuracy of the various intrafraction guidance methodsDuring radiotherapy treatmentAccuracy of various intrafraction guidance methods will be determined against triangulation of kilovoltage (kV) and Megavoltage (MV) projections

Countries

Australia

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAndrew Kneebone, MBBS

Northern Sydney Local Health District

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026