Skip to content

CBA Versus FBA Conditioning Followed by Allogeneic HSCT in Treatment of High Risk and Refractory AML

CBA Versus FBA Conditioning Followed by Allogeneic HSCT in Treatment of High Risk and Refractory AML

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03384212
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-12-27
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2021-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allogeneic Hematopoeitic Stem Cell Transplantation, High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

cladribine, fludarabine, relapse

Brief summary

Aim: To evaluated if cladribine based conditioning (CBA) could decrease relapse after HLA matched HSCT in high risk and refractory AML patients as compared with fludarabine based conditioning regimen(FBA). Study design: open-labed, prospective, multicenter, randomized control study Number of subjects: 60 each group Treatment: CBA group: CBA as HSCT conditioning which including cladribine 5mg/m2 day -6 to day -2 , busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 and cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2. FBA group: FBA as HSCT conditioning which including fludarabine 30mg/m2 day -6 to day -2, busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 and cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2.

Detailed description

Relapse is still the main reason of death for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially for those with high risk and refractory disease. Cladribine and fludarabine are both purine analogs used in treatment of AML. Two studies by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) demonstrated that the addition of cladribine to DA (DAC) was associated with an increased complete remission (CR) rate and prolonged overall survival (OS) in the general AML population, with the most prominent effect in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics. Therefore we presume cladribine may more effective in eliminating leukemic cells so that reduce relapse after HSCT. Eligible patients in this study should between 18 to 60 years old with confirmed AML and fulfilled at least one criteria defining high risk or refractory disease.Patients must have HLA 9/10 or 10/10 matched sibling or unrelated donor. Patients will be excluded if they present any contraindication for HSCT, including respiratory failure, heart failure, liver or kidney function failure et al. To evaluate if cladribine based conditioning (CBA) could decrease relapse after HLA matched HSCT in high risk and refractory AML patients as compared with fludarabine based conditioning regimen(FBA), 120 eligible patients will be randomized to two groups, the CBA group and the FBA group. Patients in the CBA group receive conditioning including cladribine 5mg/m2 day -6 to day -2 , busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 and cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2. While patients in the FBA group receive conditioning including fludarabine 30mg/m2 day -6 to day -2 , busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 and cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2. Graft versus host disease(GVHD) prophylactic regimen include cyclosporine A and short term MTX, ATG 6mg/kg is additionally administered to patients with unrelated donors. Patients will be followed up for 2 years and the primary end point is the cumulative relapse rate at 2 years. The second end points of the study include the overall survival, disease free survival and non-relapse mortality at 2 years.

Interventions

DRUGCladribine
DRUGFludarabine
DRUGBusulfan
DRUGCytarabine

Sponsors

Changhai Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tongji Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Chengdu PLA General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tang-Du Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

open labled randomized controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of AML confirmed by bone marrow cell morphology, immunology, cytogenetics and molecular biology (MICM). Blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and AML transferred from myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS) or other diseases are also included. 2. AML with high risk cytogenetic abnormals, such as FLT3- ITD, et al. 3. Patients fulfilled at least one of the following criteria defining refractory AML:(1) primary induction failure (PIF) after 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy; (2) first early relapse after a remission duration of fewer than 12 months and refractory to salvage combination chemotherapy; (3) second or subsequent relapse . 4. Have HLA 9/10 or 10/10 matched siblings or unrelated donor,the donor must match the health conditions of hematopoietic stem cell donation (criteria of China Marrow Donor Program) and be willing to donate. 5. Performance status score no more than 2 (ECOG criteria). 6. Adequate organ function as defined by the following criteria:ALT, AST and total serum bilirubin \<2×ULN (upper limit of normal), Serum creatinine and BUN \<1.25×ULN. 7. Adequate cardiac function without acute myocardial infarction, arrhythmia or atrioventricular block, heart failure, active rheumatic heart disease and cardiac dilatation. 8. Signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrollment. 9. Willingness and ability to comly with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of any condition inappropriate for HSCT. 2. Presence of any fatal disease, including respiratory failure, heart failure, liver or kidney function failure et al. 3. Have no suitable donor. 4. Pregnancy or breast feeding. 5. Current treatment on another clinical trail. 6. Any other condition the investigator judged the patient inappropriate for entry into this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cumulative relapse rate at 2 year2 yearsThe percentage of all patients who are relapsed within 2 years after allogeneic HSCT.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survival at 2 year2 yearsThe percentage of all patients who are still alive 2 years after allogeneic HSCT.
disease free survival at 2year2 yearsThe percentage of all patients who are leukemia free 2 years after allogeneic HSCT.
non-relapse mortality at 2year2 yearsThe percentage of patients who are dead of all reasons except relapse.
non-relapse mortality at 100days100 daysThe percentage of patients who are dead of all reasons except relapse.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJieling Jiang, M.D.
jiangjieling66@hotmail.com86-21-37798987
Backup ContactLiping Wan, M.D., Ph.D.
wanliping924@hotmail.com86-21-37798987

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026