Skip to content

HRV-B for Symptom Management in Sickle Cell Patients

Use of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Biofeedback for Symptom Management Among Sickle Cell Patients: Pilot Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03383913
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-12-27
Start date
2018-01-22
Completion date
2018-12-28
Last updated
2024-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback, Sickle Cell Disease

Brief summary

This study will test the hypothesis that Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-B) restores autonomic balance and reduces pain and other symptoms among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).The specific aims of this study are to: (1) conduct a randomized, wait list controlled, pilot intervention trial to determine whether HRV-B increases HRV coherence among SCD participants (minimum N of 30, up to 50 total); (2) determine whether HRV-B reduces pain, stress, fatigue, depression or insomnia among SCD participants; and (3) determine whether increases in HRV coherence are associated improvements in pain, stress, fatigue, depression, or sleep among study participants.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to see if Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-B) can reduce chronic pain, stress, depression, anxiety, insomnia, loneliness, helplessness, physical limitations and pain medication dependence. HRV-B is an interactive procedure in which participants relax and breathe regularly while watching a computer screen. The computer screen provides feedback that helps people increase their heart rate variability, which is the difference from beat to beat. HRV-B is a complementary, non-pharmacologic therapy that is now being used to see if it can help sickle cell patients reduce their symptoms of pain, stress, insomnia, fatigue, or depression. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an Intervention Group or a Comparison Group. Each group will have about 15-20 participants. The Intervention group will receive a baseline assessment including symptom questionnaires, up to six weekly HRV-B training sessions lasting about 45 minutes each, and a follow-up assessment including symptom questionnaires. There are 6-8 total visits for the intervention group and 2 for the control group. The Comparison Group will have a baseline assessment including symptom questionnaires, then six weeks with no training sessions, then a follow up assessment including symptom questionnaires. After the follow up assessment, the Comparison Group members will have the option of receiving the same treatment as the Intervention Group.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHeart Rate Variability Biofeedback

Over a period of 4-6 weeks participants in the intervention arm will learn a series of breathing techniques to determine Heart Rate Variability's effects on physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, participation in social activities, pain interference and intensity.

Sponsors

University of South Carolina
CollaboratorOTHER
Prisma Health-Upstate
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* SCD patients * 10 years old * English literate * Patient recruited through Greenville Health System * Any race or ethnicity * Any sex

Exclusion criteria

* Conditions affecting HRV (paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction within 12 months, unstable angina) * Medications that affect cardiac rhythm (angiotensin converting enzyme, calcium channel, or beta-adrenergic inhibitors) * Pacemaker or defibrillator * Heart transplant or by-pass surgery within 1 year * Active seizure disorder or use of antiseizure/anticonvulsant medication specifically for seizures * Dementia * Moderate or severe head injury or stroke within 6 months * Evidence of active substance abuse * An uncontrolled major psychiatric disorder * Cognitive disability that precludes participation * Use of long acting (extended release) opioid medications; however, 'as needed' short acting opioid medication usage is allowable

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measures4-6 weeksA comprehensive survey of physical function, anxiety, sleep disturbance, depression, fatigue, social roles, pain interference, and pain intensity are completed before the study begins and upon completion. Each domain is measured with a separate short form consisting of eight questions, with the exception of pain intensity, which is measured as a raw score of zero to ten. The scores of these surveys are combined. This number is then converted to a single PROMIS measure T score metric.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Quality4-6 weeksSleep quality will be quantified using wrist actigraph monitors that will be worn by the subject for seven days at the beginning and end of the study
C-Reactive Protein in saliva4-6 weeksProtein saliva samples will be collected by participants at baseline and at followup. Using an ELISA assay kit we will quantify inflammation mediators and C-Reactive Protein.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026