Skip to content

Dual Guidance in Regional Anesthesia

Dual Guidance in Regional Anesthesia - Prospective Randomized Study of Needle-nerve Distance in Different Cannulas for Regional Nerve Blockade

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03383770
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-12-26
Start date
2018-02-05
Completion date
2019-09-15
Last updated
2022-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Anesthesia; Adverse Effect, Anesthesia, Local

Brief summary

Regional anaesthesia is a frequently used procedure. Currently, blockades are increasingly carried out without nerve stimulation. The risk of nerve lesion is about 3 %. Industrial efforts frequently referred to ultrasound optimisation of the regional anaesthesia cannula. In order to optimise patient safety, the benefit of both procedures (stimulation and ultrasound) should be combined and both procedures optimised. In this study, the influence of the needle electrode size on the stimulability of the nerve ischiadicus should be determined.

Detailed description

There are various methods of performing regional anesthesia. In recent years, the focus has been on ultrasound-supported regional anaesthesia, and the stimulation methods that were often used in the past were no longer used or used less frequently. The combination of both methods may be an additional safety aspect and can contribute to an improved blocking quality. In addition to the best possible ultrasound quality, an optimal stimulation quality is also required. The investigators plan to carry out dual-guidance blockages of the ischiadic nerve with various regional anaesthesia needles (manufacturer of the used needles: Pajunk Medical Produkte GmbH, Geisingen, Germany; Teleflex Medical GmbH, Kernen, Germany). All regional anaesthesia cannulae are approved for the planned blockades of humans in Germany.

Interventions

PROCEDURERegional Anesthesia Touhy

The patients receive the planned anaesthesia procedure according to the procedure to be performed. Only nerve blockages are carried out, which are considered to be analgesic useful for the planned operations on the basis of typical nerve courses. A touhy cannula is used.

PROCEDURERegional Anesthesia Facet

The patients receive the planned anaesthesia procedure according to the procedure to be performed. Only nerve blockages are carried out, which are considered to be analgesic useful for the planned operations on the basis of typical nerve courses. A facet cannula is used.

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

The selection of the puncture cannula for regional anaesthesia is not up to the performing anaesthetist, as is usual in the clinical standard, but is made randomly on the basis of a random list. The blockade is carried out by two anaesthetists experienced in regional anaesthesia, who have the principle of dual control. The ultrasound image acquired during the blockade is recorded in the form of an ultrasound video for subsequent evaluation. The recorded ultrasound videos are stored pseudonymously on the server of the Klinik für Anästhesiologie m. S. operativ Intensivmedizin reported to the data protection department.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of the written declaration of consent * Age of at least 18 years * No participation in another intervention study during participation

Exclusion criteria

* present contraindication for the application of regional anesthesia and nerve stimulation * Cardiac pacemaker/AICD (Automated internal cardioverter defibrillator) carrier * Known allergies to used medicines * Patients under 18 years of age * Ineligible patients * Missing consent * Pregnancy/nursing patients * Classification of patients into class 4 or higher status according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists * Existing nerve damage in the target area * Medically treated diabetes mellitus, alcohol abuse or alcohol abuse in the patient's history (using AUDIT) * Visibility score of the nerve of 3 or more * Participation in another intervention study during participation * Accommodation in an institution on the basis of a court or administrative order

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ultrasound distanceduration of blockade, an average of 15 minutesUltrasound-based measurement of needle-nerve distance during the application of the regional anesthesia of the N. ischiadicus during infragluteal access.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visibility_2duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutesUltrasound visibility of nerve
Impedanceduration of blockade, an average of 15 minutesImpedance measured by nerve stimulator while progressing the needle
Effect_motorduration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutesEffectiveness of the motor blockade measured by possible movement of the foot
Effect_sensoricduration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutesEffectiveness of the blockade measured by temperature sensibility testing on the food
Visibility_1duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutesUltrasound visibility of needle

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contactduration of blockade, an average of 15 minutesNumber of Needle-Nerve-Contacts by Ultrasound-measurement
Complicationsduration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutesOccurence of complications of regional anesthesia
Impedance_Changeduration of blockade, an average of 15 minutesChanges in impedance measurement while blockade

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026