Skip to content

Does Low-does Cervical Epidural Lidocaine Cause Transient Weakness?

Do Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections With Low-dose Lidocaine Cause Transient Objective Upper Extremity Weakness? A Prospective Randomized

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03382925
Enrollment
16
Registered
2017-12-26
Start date
2017-12-20
Completion date
2020-08-19
Last updated
2022-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Radiculopathy

Keywords

cervical epidural steroid injection, local anesthetic, upper extremity weakness

Brief summary

Does low-does cervical epidural lidocaine cause transient weakness?

Detailed description

Cervical radicular pain is relatively common, often treated with epidural steroid injection (ESI), when conservative treatments like oral analgesics, physical therapy, and activity modification have failed. There are no universal clinical practice guidelines for the use of diluents when CESI are performed. Interlaminar CESI may be performed with or without the use of local anesthetics, due to training bias or theoretical concerns of weakness. CESI without the benefit of local anesthetic as a steroid diluent increases the latency of pain relief and may decrease diagnostic information immediately after a CESI with regard to pain generators responsible for symptoms, and may potentially decrease patient satisfaction. By evaluating the effects of local anesthetic as a diluent during interlaminar cervical ESI, we will enhance the safety of this treatment with regard to expectations of objective motor weakness as well as post procedure pain control in the recovery phase after the injection procedure. Additionally, investigation of short-term pain, function, medication use, and global impression of change following use of local anesthetic versus saline as a diluent during interlaminar cervical ESI will provide evidence to inform the optimization of clinical outcomes related to steroid diluent choice.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcervical interlaminar with lidocaine

Interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg (40 mg/mL) + 2 mL 1% lidocaine.

PROCEDUREcervical interlaminar with normal saline

Interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg (40 mg/mL) + 2 mL preservative saline

DRUGLidocaine

2 mL lidocaine to be used as steroid diluent in group #1 cervical interlaminar procedure.

DRUGTriamcinolone Acetonide

2 mL of 40 mg/mL will be used as the steroid in group #1 and group #2 cervical interlaminar procedures.

DRUGNormal saline

2 mL of normal saline to be used as steroid diluent in group #2 cervical interlaminar procedure.

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Each subject will be randomized into a group assignment in a 1:1 manner, #1 or #2, as outlined in the Methods section.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-80. 2. Clinical diagnosis of cervical radicular pain. 3. Magnetic resonance imaging pathology consistent with clinical symptoms/signs. 4. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score of 4 or higher. 5. Pain duration of more than 6 weeks despite trial of conservative therapy (medications, physical therapy, or chiropractic care). 6. Patients who will undergo CESI for treatment of cervical radiculitis.

Exclusion criteria

1. Refusal to participate, provide consent, or provide communication and follow-up information for duration of the study. 2. Inability to perform handgrip or arm strength testing. 3. Contraindications to Cervical ESI (active infection, bleeding disorders, current anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication use, allergy to medications used for CIESI, and pregnancy). 4. Current glucocorticoid use or ESI within past 6 months. 5. Prior cervical spine surgery. 6. Cervical spinal cord lesions; cerebrovascular, demyelinating, or other neuro-muscular muscular disease. 7. Patient request for or requirement of conscious sedation for the injection procedure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Dynamometer Testing Post Procedure With Lidocaine vs Normal Saline.30 minutes post-procedureStrength Testing Dynamometry post procedure with lidocaine vs normal saline.
Sensory Exam Testing Post Procedure With Lidocaine vs Normal Saline.30 minutes post-procedureSensory Exam of upper extremity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensitypre procedure, post-procedure, 1 day follow up, and one month follow upPain intensity will be measured by a 0-10 scale called Numerical Rating Scale. (0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain)
Upper Extremity Functional Indexpre procedure, post-procedure, 1 day follow up, and one month follow upUpper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) Questionnaire
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Changes30 minutes post-procedureMean Arterial Pressure
Patient Global Impression of Changeone month follow up7 point question called Patient Global Impression of Change
Pain Medicationpre procedure, post-procedure, 1 day follow up, and one month follow upPain medication changes throughout treatment using MQS III calculator
Heart Rate Changes30 minutes post-procedureHeart Rate

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cervical Interlaminar With Lidocaine
Group #1: Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone acetonide 80 mg (40 mg/mL) + 2 mL 1% lidocaine (total volume 4 mL). cervical interlaminar with lidocaine: Interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg (40 mg/mL) + 2 mL 1% lidocaine. Lidocaine: 2 mL lidocaine to be used as steroid diluent in group #1 cervical interlaminar procedure. Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 mL of 40 mg/mL will be used as the steroid in group #1 and group #2 cervical interlaminar procedures.
10
Cervical Interlaminar With Normal Saline
Group #2: Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone acetonide 80 mg (40 mg/mL) + 2 mL preservative saline (total volume 4 mL). cervical interlaminar with normal saline: Interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg (40 mg/mL) + 2 mL preservative saline Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 mL of 40 mg/mL will be used as the steroid in group #1 and group #2 cervical interlaminar procedures. Normal saline: 2 mL of normal saline to be used as steroid diluent in group #2 cervical interlaminar procedure.
6
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCervical Interlaminar With Normal SalineTotalCervical Interlaminar With Lidocaine
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants14 Participants8 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants16 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 100 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Dynamometer Testing Post Procedure With Lidocaine vs Normal Saline.

Strength Testing Dynamometry post procedure with lidocaine vs normal saline.

Time frame: 30 minutes post-procedure

Population: Data was not collected. Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Zero participants completed both arms requirements. No statistical analysis obtained.

Primary

Sensory Exam Testing Post Procedure With Lidocaine vs Normal Saline.

Sensory Exam of upper extremity

Time frame: 30 minutes post-procedure

Population: Data was not collected. Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Zero participants completed both arms requirements. No statistical analysis obtained.

Secondary

Heart Rate Changes

Heart Rate

Time frame: 30 minutes post-procedure

Population: Data was not collected. Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Zero participants completed both arms requirements. No statistical analysis obtained.

Secondary

Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Changes

Mean Arterial Pressure

Time frame: 30 minutes post-procedure

Population: Data was not collected. Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Zero participants completed both arms requirements. No statistical analysis obtained.

Secondary

Pain Intensity

Pain intensity will be measured by a 0-10 scale called Numerical Rating Scale. (0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain)

Time frame: pre procedure, post-procedure, 1 day follow up, and one month follow up

Population: Data was not collected. Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Zero participants completed both arms requirements. No statistical analysis obtained.

Secondary

Pain Medication

Pain medication changes throughout treatment using MQS III calculator

Time frame: pre procedure, post-procedure, 1 day follow up, and one month follow up

Population: Data was not collected. Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Zero participants completed both arms requirements. No statistical analysis obtained.

Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change

7 point question called Patient Global Impression of Change

Time frame: one month follow up

Population: Data was not collected. Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Zero participants completed both arms requirements. No statistical analysis obtained.

Secondary

Upper Extremity Functional Index

Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) Questionnaire

Time frame: pre procedure, post-procedure, 1 day follow up, and one month follow up

Population: Data was not collected. Study terminated early due to low enrollment. Zero participants completed both arms requirements. No statistical analysis obtained.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026