Amphetamine Use Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
methamphetamine, transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, amphetamine, drug craving
Brief summary
Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) is among the costliest and deadliest substance use disorders (SUDs) world-wide and is frequently comorbid with other mental health conditions. There is no empirically validated medical treatment for MUD. Drug craving is the signature aspect of MUD and other substance use disorders and has been associated with continued drug use and relapse. The investigators and others have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can modulate drug craving in different SUDs. tDCS is a method of non-invasive brain stimulation and is a low-cost scalable technology without any serious side effects that delivers low levels of direct current (0.1-2 mAmp) transcranially. However, there are significant inter-individual differences in response to tDCS, which is not well understood but can have profound impact on efficacy. Meanwhile, there are no studies with neuroimaging to show how tDCS affects drug craving. Investigators propose the first combined tDCS/functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) study to examine the acute effects of tDCS on neural substrates underlying drug induced craving.
Detailed description
Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) is among the costliest and deadliest substance use disorders (SUDs) world-wide and is frequently comorbid with other mental health conditions. There is no empirically validated medical treatment for MUD. Drug craving is the signature aspect of MUD and other substance use disorders and has been associated with continued drug use and relapse. The investigators and others have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can modulate drug craving in different SUDs. tDCS is a method of non-invasive brain stimulation and is a low-cost scalable technology without any serious side effects that delivers low levels of direct current (0.1-2 mAmp) transcranially. However, there are significant inter-individual differences in response to tDCS, which is not well understood but can have profound impact on efficacy. Meanwhile, there are no studies with neuroimaging to show how tDCS affects drug craving. The investigators propose the first combined tDCS/functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) study to examine the acute effects of tDCS on neural substrates underlying drug induced craving. The investigators hypothesize that tDCS amplifies DLPFC's top-down modulatory role via its connectivity to other cortical-subcortical areas. In this double blind randomized experimental design, the investigators will recruit 60 people with MUD during their early abstinence phases into parallel arms with active and sham DLPFC tDCS. Each subject will undergo resting state and task based (drug cue exposure paradigm) functional MRI pre and post tDCS. The investigators will conduct individual difference analyses to explore the potential predictors for tDCS response, including pre-tDCS top-down connectivity measures of DLPFC and other subjective, clinical, behavioral, structural, and functional variables. The results of this study will provide neuroscience-based evidence for the efficacy of tDCS and will advance the field towards precision addiction medicine.
Interventions
DEVICEActive transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) as a device-based technology is employed by applying a very weak (2 mAmp) direct current over the skull for 1200 seconds with 30 seconds ramp up to 2 mAmp, and 30 seconds ramp down at the end.
DEVICESham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) as a device-based technology is employed by applying a very weak direct current over the skull. Sham mode will have just 30 seconds ramp up to 2 mAmp, 40 seconds on 2 mAmp stimulation and, 30 seconds ramp down with 1160 seconds no stimulation (just impedance control).
Sponsors
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. English speaking. 2. Diagnosed with Methamphetamine Use Disorder (last 12 months) based on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) interview (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-DSM-5) 3. Being abstinent from methamphetamine in an addiction treatment program for at least one week based on medical records or self-report 4. Positive response to Methamphetamine cue-reactivity screening (MCS) 5. Willing and capable of interacting with the informed consent process
Exclusion criteria
1. Unwillingness or inability to complete any of the major aspects of the study protocol, including magnetic resonance imaging (i.e., due to claustrophobia), drug cue rating, or behavioral assessment. 2. Abstinence from methamphetamine for more than 6 months based on self-report 3. Schizophrenia or bipolar disorder based on the MINI interview 4. Active suicidal ideation with intent or plan determined by self-report or assessment by PI or study staff during the initial screening or any other phase of the study 5. Positive drug test for amphetamines, opioids, cannabis, alcohol,Phencyclidine (PCP), or cocaine confirmed by breath analyzer and urine tests 6. Any active skin disorder that affects skin integrity of the scalp 7. Having any condition that would preclude undergoing an fMRI scan or tDCS stimulation based on the fMRI safety and tDCS safety checklists 8. Unstable medical disorder reported in subject's medical history or by a clinician assessment 9. History of seizure 10. Non-correctable vision or hearing problems. 11. Any other condition the PI or study staff feel would put the subject at risk for entering the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Drug Cue Reactivity BOLD Signal in fMRI from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Drug Cue Reactivity BOLD Signal is measured as average blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal difference with voxel-wise analysis in the regions of interests (ROIs) (prefrontal cortex parcels, insula segments, striatum nuclei, thalamus nuclei and extended amygdala nuclei) in craving \> neutral contrast in drug cue exposure fMRI task with blocks of neutral and drug related images |
| Change in Drug Cue Reactivity Self-Report from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Drug cue reactivity self-report is measured as the difference in subjective response to On a scale of 0-100, How much drug craving are you experiencing RIGHT NOW measured on a visual analog scale (0-100) before and after drug cue exposure fMRI task |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in RAI in Resting State fMRI from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Resource Allocation Index (RAI) is measured with the correlation among default mode network (DMN), saliency network (SN) and Executive Control Network (ECN) in resting state fMRI based on Lerman, et al., 2014. |
| Change in Cortical-Subcortical Task-based Connectivity in Cue Exposure fMRI from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Cortical-subcortical task-based connectivity in cue exposure fMRI is measured as psychophysiological interaction (PPI) between average blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal time series in subcortical ROIs and voxels within prefrontal cortex and insula, using craving \> neutral contrast regressor |
| Change in Area Under Electrode Connectivity in Resting State fMRI from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Area under electrode connectivity is measured with voxel-wise correlation between average blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in the cortical area under the Anode and Cathode electrodes and whole brain |
| Change in Area Under Electrode Task-based Connectivity in Cue Exposure fMRI from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Area under electrode task-based connectivity is measured with voxel-wise Psychophysiological Interaction (PPI) between average blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in the cortical area under the Anode and Cathode electrodes and whole brain using craving \> neutral contrast regressor in block-design drug cue exposure fMRI task |
| Change in Momentary Craving Self-Report from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Momentary craving self-report is assessed with subjective response to On a scale of 0-100, How much drug craving are you experiencing RIGHT NOW measured on a visual analog scale (0-100) |
| Change in Cortical-Subcortical Connectivity in Resting State fMRI from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Cortical-Subcortical Connectivity is measured as correlation between resting-state average blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal time series in subcortical ROIs and voxels within prefrontal cortex and Insula |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in DDT Score from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | DDT score is measured with responses to the Delayed Discounting Task (DDT) (Green & Myerson, 2004) |
| Change in DI DDQ Score from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | DI DDQ score is measured as response to the desire and intention (DI) subscore of the Desire for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ) for Methamphetamine (Franken, et al., 2002). |
| Change in NR DDQ Score from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | NR DDQ score is measured as response to the negative reinforcement (NR) subscore of the Desire for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ) for Methamphetamine (Franken, et al., 2002). |
| Change in Drug Cue Control Response from before to after Intervention | Immediate before and immediate after intervention | Drug cue control response is measured as the difference in subjective response to On a scale of 0-100, How much CONTROL over your drug craving are you experiencing RIGHT NOW measured on a visual analog scale (0-100) before and after drug cue exposure fMRI task |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed