Skip to content

Natural Experiment: Gentle Nudge Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement

Natural Experiment: Gentle Nudge Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03381885
Acronym
LBP-ED
Enrollment
20000
Registered
2017-12-22
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2017-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Clinical Decision Support Tool, CT Scan, MRI, X-rays

Brief summary

Back pain costs the U.S. over $100 billion annually, and much of this spending is wasteful due to the overuse of advanced diagnostic imaging. Despite prominent clinical guidelines and the nationally recognized Choosing Wisely campaign discouraging use of costly and low value imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) studies remain frequently overused. Real-time electronic clinical decision support (CDS) at the point of care has been increasingly emphasized as an important strategy to improve the value of back pain management; however, studies suggest that CDS at best only modestly influences practice patterns. The aim is to implement a behavioral economic-based intervention in the ED to promote the use of CDS system.

Detailed description

Despite prominent clinical guidelines and the nationally recognized Choosing Wisely campaign discouraging use of costly and low value imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) studies remain frequently overused. Few studies have rigorously investigated the causes of CDS' limited influence on care as well as interventions to enhance CDS' impact on reducing low value imaging. The implementation of CDS to reduce low value MRI and CT imaging studies for back pain at a large safety net health system was monitored. The CDS systems was integrated into the electronic health record system. Clinicians answered several questions and select from a list of basic imaging indications and CDS provides an American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria score. Appropriate scores ranged from 7-9, borderline scores ranging from 4-6, and inappropriate scores ranging from 1-3 (clinicians are encouraged to cancel inappropriate orders). Electronic order data on imaging studies was pulled using CPT billable data and imaging studies were categorized as appropriate, canceled, changed, and unscored orders. Early observation of CDS implementation revealed that LAC+USC Medical Center (one of 16 sites) had high percentages of unscored orders. At this intervention site, a nudge grounded in behavioral economic theory (nudge=gentle incentive, preserving freedom of choice) was provided where clinicians ordering medium or high scoring studies could bypass the usual mandatory phone call to radiology. This natural experiment was evaluated using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DinD) analysis to measure whether high scores increased and unscored studies decreased at the intervention site vs. 15 control sites over time. Generalized linear regression models were used that accounted for clustering by practice site and adjusting for patient and clinician characteristics.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGentle Nudge

Clinicians ordering medium or high scoring imaging studies could bypass the usual mandatory phone call to radiology.

BEHAVIORALUsual Standard Procedure

Clinicians ordering imaging studies required mandatory phone to radiology

Sponsors

LAC+USC Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Los Angeles Department of Health Services
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
American Board of Internal Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults with Lower Back Pain receiving treatment at Los Angeles Department of Health Services Facility (LAC-DHS) * Adults whose physicians order Imaging Studies (CT SCANs and MRIs)

Exclusion criteria

* Non-LAC-DHS patients * Patient without Lower Back Pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders6 months from the date of intervention implementationChange in the percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Appropriate, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders6 months from the date of intervention implementationChange in the percentage of Appropriateness, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026