Skip to content

Different Radiation Dose of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Resectable Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma

Different Radiation Dose of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery in Treating Patients with Locally Advanced, Resectable Thoracic Esophageal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03381651
Acronym
Neo-DRATEC
Enrollment
147
Registered
2017-12-22
Start date
2018-02-22
Completion date
2023-02-22
Last updated
2024-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Carcinoma, Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery

Keywords

Radiation dose

Brief summary

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, while more than half new cases and deaths occurred in China. Surgery is the main curative treatment for this disease, the 5-year survival of EC remains poor, since most diseases are diagnosed at advanced stages. In last decades, several large clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery can significantly increase the overall survival of patients with EC compared with surgery alone, while no effect of nCRT was apparent on postoperative health-related quality of life . However, the optimal radiation dose and surgery timing are still unknown. The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive higher dose (50.4Gy/28F) of neoadjuvant chemoradiation will have better pathologic response and progress-free survival compared to lower dose (41.4Gy/23F) of chemoradiation followed by surgery.

Interventions

RADIATIONHigher dose (50.4Gy/28F) of neoadjuvant chemoradiation

50.4Gy/28F radiation and concurrent chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus CBP used weekly

RADIATIONLower dose (41.4Gy/23F) of neoadjuvant chemoradiation

41.4Gy/23F radiation and concurrent chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus CBP used weekly

Sponsors

Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age:18-70 years Histologically verified squamous carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Patients with performance status 0-1 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale at the pre CRT evaluation and judges to be fit for surgery at the pre and post CRT evaluations. Tumors should be resectable or potentially resectable and without distant metastasis, as assessed before neoadjuvant CRT, including clinical stage T2-4N0M0 or T1-4N1M0 according to the 6th AJCC system. Joined the study voluntarily and signed informed consent form No surgical contraindications No serious system dysfunction and immuno-deficiency, Adequate organ function including the following: Hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL, Neutrophils (ANC )≥1.5x109/L, platelet count ≥100x 109/L, TBIL\<1.5 x ULN, ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN, creatinine≤1.5 x ULN

Exclusion criteria

Cervical esophageal cancer (The upper end of the lesion is in the esophagus of the cervical segment). Patients with biopsy (by endoscopic ultrasound, laparoscopy, or laparotomy) proven metastatic supraclavicular or celiac nodes are ineligible. Invasion of the tracheobronchial tree or aorta Tracheoesophageal fistula Concurrent pregnancy or lactation Severe diabetes mellitus with poor blood glucose control History of a second malignancy Patients being unable to undergo esophageal reconstruction with gastric tube, due to prior surgery. Patients undergoing esophageal reconstruction with jejunum. Patients have allergy reaction or contraindications to taxanes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survival2 yearTime from randomization to tumor progression or any deaths

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
R0 resection rate in each armanalysis is completed 4 weeks after surgeryno cancer cells seen microscopically at the resection margin
Complete pathological response rateanalysis is completed 4 weeks after surgeryusing the Chirieac grading system
Postoperative complications in each study arm30 and 90 days after surgeryAccording to the NCI CTC3.0
Treatment failure pattern2 yearincluding local recurrence or distant metastasis or both
Overall survival5 yearby intention to treat and per protocol analyses in each study arm

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026