Participant Satisfaction With Two Different Summative Assessment Methods - a Mixed Method Questionnaire Study

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03381443

Enrollment

428

Registered

2017-12-22

Start date

2017-12-02

Completion date

2019-12-31

Last updated

2020-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Assessment Evaluation

Brief summary

Participants of Immediate Life Support and Advanced Life Support Courses, where two different summative assessment methods were used are asked about their satisfaction with the assessment method using a questionnaire. Both quantitative questions using an 11-point-Likert scale as well as open-ended qualitative questions will be asked. The primary aim of this study is to find out which variant of summative assessment is perceived by course participants as testing their leadership competency best, immediately after the comparison as well as 1 year later to identify any long-term effects on the students.

Interventions

OTHERdifferent assessments

coded survey about NTS and assessment

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Inclusion criteria

* All 5th and 6th year medical students at the University of Bern, Switzerland, study year 2017/2018 and 2018/2019

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Participant satisfaction with summative assessment methods during Life Support Courses	directly after assessment and 1 year later	evaluation of NTS assessed by assessment

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026