Skip to content

Pilot Study of Treatment for Subclinical AMR (Antibody-mediated Rejection) in Kidney Transplant Recipients

A Randomized Pilot Study of Treatment for Subclinical Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03380936
Enrollment
4
Registered
2017-12-21
Start date
2018-01-17
Completion date
2019-10-16
Last updated
2020-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplant Rejection

Keywords

subclinical, graft rejection, AMR (antibody-mediated rejection), AMBR (acute antibody-mediated rejection), DSA (donor specific antibodies)

Brief summary

This is a pilot study to determine if extended release Envarsus at an optimal level is just as effective as more invasive standard therapies for subclinical (mild) AMR (antibody mediated rejection) in kidney transplant patients. Subjects will be randomized to either conversion to Envarsus XR (extended release); or, to a standard of care regimen of plasma exchange/IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin)/rituximab treatments.

Detailed description

There is currently minimal data to guide treatment of mild graft damage in kidney transplant patients. Some of the current therapies used often come with dangerous complications (infections, malignancies, etc.). This is a pilot study to determine if extended release Envarsus at an optimal level is just as effective as more invasive standard therapies for subclinical (mild) AMR (antibody mediated rejection) in kidney transplant patients. The subjects will be randomized to either conversion from their current tacrolimus regimen to Envarsus XR (a once a day, extended release version of tacrolimus); or, to a regimen of 5 plasma exchanges/IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin) treatments and one treatment with rituximab. Subjects who are within their first year of transplant will visit their doctor monthly for regular tests and checks and then will have a kidney biopsy at 6 months. Subjects who had their transplant over a year prior will see the doctor for tests and checks at 1, 3 and 5 months and then will have a biopsy of the kidney at month 6.

Interventions

Switching from current version of tacrolimus to the extended release, once a day version (Envarsus) and titrating dose to achieve an optimal trough level. Goal trough tac level \> 8 ng/ml, MPA at 720 mg bid unless medically contraindicated, prednisone at current dose (5mg) or continue taper to 5mg per center standard of care protocol.

OTHERPlasma Exchange and IVIG (Intravenous Immunoglobulin )

Plasma exchange x 5 treatments, each followed by IVIG 200 mg/kg except last dose of 1 gm/kg. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 following final plasma exchange treatment.

Sponsors

Veloxis Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Only patients meeting histologic criteria for AMR by Banff 2013 criteria will be randomized (ptc + g + c4d ≥ 2). Subjects will be randomized to either undergo optimization (conversion to Envarsus with goal trough tacrolimus level \> 8 ng/ml, mycophenolic acid at 720 mg, prednisone at current dose (5mg) or continue taper to 5mg per center standard of care protocol of or treatment.); or, to treat clinical AMR (antibody mediated rejection) with plasma exchange x 5 treatments, each followed by IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin) 200 mg/kg except last dose of 1 gm/kg. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 following final plasma exchange treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (18+ years) recipients of kidney or kidney/pancreas transplants * Willing to sign an IRB (institutional review board)-approved consent and to comply with study requirements * DSA (donor specific antibodies) detected by SAB (single antigen beads) screening with MFI ≥ 2000 * Graft biopsy performed within prior 30 days * Stable renal function defined by serum creatinine increase ≤ 30% over prior 6 months * Subacute antibody-mediated rejection on biopsy defined by ptc + g + C4d ≥ 2 by Banff 2013 criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Kidney/liver or kidney/heart recipient * Unwilling/unable to undergo screening biopsy * HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), HCV (hepatitis-C virus), or HBsAg (hepatitis-B surface antigen) positive * Active/untreated infection * Acute cellular rejection with Banff grade 1b, 2a, 2b on initial biopsy requiring rATG (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) therapy * Pregnant or nursing females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Acute Inflammatory Histologic ParametersBaseline and 6 monthsAny increase or reduction in ptc+g+C4d score by Banff 2013 criteria) from baseline (pre-treatment) to 6 month (post-treatment initiation). Analysis will comprise exact chi-squared tests for comparison of binomial proportions of histological response between the two treatment groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Donor-Specific Antibody (DSA) Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) Level6 and 12 monthsComparison of these levels and any changes of levels/rates using two-sided two-sample t-tests.
Change in serum creatinine6 and 12 monthsComparison of these levels and any changes of levels/rates using two-sided two-sample t-tests.
Change in MDRD GFR (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Glomerular Filtration Rate)6 and 12 monthsComparison of these levels and any changes of levels/rates using two-sided two-sample t-tests.
Patient Survival6 and 12 monthsTotal and death-censored calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using logrank tests.
Evaluation of Adverse Events6 and 12 monthsAll potential adverse events will be captured and recorded by study coordinators during post-treatment standard of care clinic visits, and reviewed by PI. Adverse events will be reported for each group separately and compared using exact chi-squared tests.
Graft Survival6 and 12 monthsTotal and death-censored calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using logrank tests.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026