Skip to content

Central and Peripheral Venous Catheters Associated Blood Stream Infection in ICU in Assiut University

Central and Peripheral Venous Catheters Associated Blood Stream Infection in the Critically Ill Patients in Assiut University Hospital

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03379948
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-12-20
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2020-02-01
Last updated
2017-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Stream Infection

Brief summary

Catheter related infections (CRIs) were found to be associated with several risk factors, including patient related risk factors such as age, gender, clinical status and catheter related risk factors such as the vascular access location, dwelling time, catheter type and number of lumens. In addition to the inserted solution type and the experience of the professional who performs the procedure ,These factors constitute important strategic points for actions to compare the infectious complications of peripheral versus central venous catheters in critically ill patients.

Detailed description

Nosocomial (hospital-acquired) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, with an estimated 250,000 cases occurring each year in the United States. BSIs may be either primary or secondary. Secondary infections are related to infections at other sites, such as the urinary tract, lung, postoperative wounds, and skin. Most nosocomial BSIs are primary, as illustrated by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system, in which 64 percent of the nosocomial BSIs reported were primary BSIs. While some primary BSIs have no identifiable source, most are associated with intravascular catheters, and central venous catheters (CVCs) in particular. Critically ill patients require intravenous administration of fluids and drugs.This can be achieved via peripheral or central catheters. Each device is associated with both mechanical and infectious complications. Complications associated with central lines are judged to be more severe. Some patients actually require the insertion of a central line due to the venous toxicity of the drugs or to the necessity of making sure that the infusion is regularly administered (example: high dose catecholamine infusion). Some physicians believe that most Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients should have a central venous line inserted, whereas others feel that some patients may receive active drugs via a peripheral line in selected instances. Endpoints are the rate of mechanical complications (difficulty in inserting the line, need for repeat insertion attempts, occurrence of arterial puncture, occurrence of pneumothorax) and of infectious complications (local catheter infection or catheter-related bloodstream infection).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTblood culture

blood culture to diagnose blood stream infection

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All patient at ICU Diagnosed nosocomial infection

Exclusion criteria

* Patients exist already infected before admission at hospital.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
compare the infectious complications of peripheral versus central venous catheters in critically ill patients7 daysby blood sample

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactmohamed maghraby, MD
maghraby@gmail.com01010685968
Backup ContactHassan mekawy
mekawy@gmail.com01285569023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026