Skip to content

Radial Head Arthroplasty A Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Monopolar and Bipolar Radial Head Arthroplasty

Radial Head Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Monopolar and Bipolar Radial Head Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03379935
Acronym
RHA
Enrollment
27
Registered
2017-12-20
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2017-10-01
Last updated
2017-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty Complications, Elbow Fracture, Radial Head Fracture

Brief summary

Fractures of the radial head are among the most common fractures in the elbow and represent one-third of all elbow fractures.This retrospective cohort study was performed between 2004 and 2014 at Sundsvall and Umeå University hospital, Sweden. All patients who were operated on between 2004 and 2014 with a radial head arthroplasty for an acute or sequelae due to a caput radii fracture.The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical or radiological differences between patients treated with a unipolar or bipolar radial head arthroplasty.

Interventions

PROCEDUREType of radial head arthroplasty

Patiens are either treated with a unipolar or a bipolar radial head arthroplasty. At Sundsvall hospital all patients were treated with a unipolar and at Umeå university hospital all patients were treated with a bipolar arthroplasty.

Sponsors

Sundsvall Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients treated with a radial head arthroplasty during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QuickDASH2-16 years postoperativelyPatients reported outcome measure. An abbreviated version of the Disabilities the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Higher score indicate a greater level of disability, lower scores indicate a lower level of disability. The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain2-16 years postoperativelyVisual analogue scale. Range 0-10. Higher value indicate more intensive pain.
Range of motion2-16 years postoperativelyRang of elbow motion. Measured in grades. Supination, pronation, extension and flexion were measured.
Reoperation2-16 years postoperativelyNumber of patients needing revision surgery
Radiographic evaluation2-16 years postoperativelyRadiographic evaluation of the prosthesis. The presence of radiolucent lines, loosening of the prosthesis.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026