Skip to content

PIEB-PCEA vs CEI-PCEA for Abdominal Oncological Surgery. A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

Randomized Comparison of Two Application Procedures: Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus in Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Continous PCEA in Abdominal Oncological Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03378804
Acronym
PIEB
Enrollment
110
Registered
2017-12-20
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2017-11-02
Last updated
2018-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

PCEA, PIEB, epidural analgesia

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare programmed intermittent bolus application and continuous epidural infusion with regard to additionally applied patient-controlled volume of local anesthesia and quality of analgesia.

Detailed description

Usually, patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is performed with a constant background infusion and patient-controlled bolus applications. An alternative approach is to give boluses at a regular rate for basic medication, instead of the continuous background infusion, maintaining the same amount of medication delivered per hour, (Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus injection; PIEB). In both cases, the patient has the option to trigger additional boluses. PIEB has been applied successfully in pain relief for lumbar epidural anesthesia in obstetrics, with better quality of analgesia and less total volume of local anesthetic required. It is assumed that the higher pressure in the epidural space with bolus injection results in a better and more uniform spread of the local anesthetic. In this study the PIEB-mode will be applied in major gynecological and abdominal surgery. In order to address the possibility that the different types of surgery result in different degrees of postoperative pain, the patients are stratified in three groups and randomized within these groups (Wertheim, Whipple, major colon surgery).

Interventions

PROCEDUREProgrammed intermittent epidural bolus application (PIEB)

Instead of a continuous background infusion of 6ml/h, one bolus injection is performed at the same amount per hour.

Sponsors

Philipps University Marburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Abdominal tumors in gynecology and general surgery * Enlightenment and written consent to the investigation

Exclusion criteria

* refusal to participate * pregnancy and breast feeding period * general contraindications for thoracic epidural anesthesia (e.g. coagulation disorders, --anticoagulation according to the guidelines of DGAI) * Impossibility to place the epidural catheter correctly * Known allergy to the drugs used in the study * Lack of understanding how to use the patient-controlled system * postoperative follow-up respiratory assistance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of additional patient-controlled bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% (consumption in ml)Beginning of operation -6 pm on the second postoperative dayThe patient-controlled bolus function is programmed with 4ml at a lock-out interval of 30min. The number of additional patient-controlled boli will be read off the epidural pump at 6 pm on the day of surgery, 6 pm on the 1st day and 6 pm on the 2nd day

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
quality of analgesiaAt 6 pm on the day of surgery, 6 pm on the 1st day and 6 pm on the 2nd dayMeasured on a visual analog scale of 0-10 (0=no pain ; 10= worst imaginable pain

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction with pain managementAt 6 pm on the day of surgery, 6 pm on the 1st day and 6 pm on the 2nd dayMeasured on a visual analog scale of 0-10
Necessity of additional rescue medicationBeginning of operation until 6 pm on the second postoperative dayPiritramid 7,5mg
motor blockadeBeginning of operation -6 pm on the second postoperative daymotor blockade is measured on the Bromage scale 0-3.
first defecation/flatusafter the operation till the end of hospital stay (max 20days)dichotomous yes/no
Sensory blockadeBeginning of operation -6 pm on the second postoperative daySensory blockade is measured with a tiptherm, motor blockade on the Bromage scale 0-3 (0= no blockade; 1=Inability to lift legs stretched; 2=Inability to bend knees, 3=Inability to move feet )

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026