Skip to content

Clinical Impact of Respiratory-Swallow Training on Refractory Dysphagia in Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Impact of Respiratory-Swallow Training on Refractory Dysphagia in OP HNC

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03377270
Enrollment
49
Registered
2017-12-19
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2025-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysphagia, Head and Neck Cancer

Keywords

Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer, dysphagia, Respiratory Swallow Training

Brief summary

Veterans following treatment of head and neck cancer can be left with lasting swallowing impairment that may require diet alterations, need for feeding tubes, and risk of pneumonia. The investigators' previous trial tested a new swallowing treatment approach to target respiratory-swallow coordination. The results revealed improvements in respiratory-swallow coordination and swallowing function. The goal of this study is to determine the impact and durability of respiratory-swallow training (RST) on clinical outcomes necessary for eating, drinking, health, and quality-of-life in Veterans with swallowing impairment following treatment for head and neck cancer. A total of 50 participants will be recruited with a goal of 40 randomly assigned to immediate RST or delayed RST.

Detailed description

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a significant health issue in Veterans. In fact, Veterans have up to a two-fold increase in the incidence of HNC when compared to the general population. Further, they often suffer profound functional deficits associated with surgical ablation and toxicity from medical treatments used to cure or control local disease. Dysphagia (swallowing impairment) is common after such treatments, and has life-altering consequences \[on health, quality-of-life, the ability to eat and drink normally, cost, and burden of care\]. Despite important advancements in medical and surgical treatments that prolong survival, many Veterans with HNC, are faced with chronic, intractable dysphagia resulting in persistent drastic alterations in diet, the need for feeding tubes, and increased risk for aspiration pneumonia - a life threatening infection. The investigators must devote research and clinical efforts to mitigate these devastating impairments because the investigators' current rehabilitative intervention options are severely limited. As such, and in keeping with the VHA's Blueprint for Excellence Transformative Actions, the need for the development of effective swallowing interventions that show potential for rapid translation to clinical practice is imperative. Coordination of respiration and swallowing is an essential element of airway protection during swallowing and facilitates many critical aspects of swallowing physiology. This key, coordinative event is significantly disrupted in patients with dysphagia following medical and surgical treatments for HNC. The investigators' previous trial in patients with severe and resistant dysphagia after cancer treatment and traditional swallowing therapy showed that targeting and recalibrating respiratory-swallow phase patterning directly through an innovative respiratory-swallow training (RST) method significantly improved aspects of swallowing physiology crucial for airway protection and clearance of ingested materials through the pharynx. These exciting new results led us to consider an expanded study with refined methods and a home practice (HP) component that will extend beyond physiologic efficacy and include more rigorous assessments of the clinical impact of RST. As with the investigators' preliminary trial, the investigators' prediction is that these innovative intervention methods will not only improve swallowing physiology and quality-of-life, but will also result in significant functional improvements in every day eating and drinking in Veterans with chronic, severe dysphagia that has been otherwise refractory to traditional swallowing intervention(s). The benefit of RST training is that it is a simple, straightforward method for patients to easily learn, and, when combined with the HP program, it is designed to facilitate patient compliance and maintenance of intervention effects. The investigators are also using commercially available and simple to use recording and analysis hardware and software that can easily be expanded to mobile technology for more widespread application to the many thousands of patients with dysphagia consequent to HNC. A total of 50 participants will be recruited with the goal of 40 participants enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either immediate RST (intervention arm) or delayed RST (control arm). The participants in the control arm will have no active treatment for 4 weeks and will then participate in RST as a cross-over design. Data obtained will be used to evaluate clinical efficacy and durability The primary efficacy endpoint is physiologic function metrics of the oropharyngeal swallow, and the secondary endpoints are airway invasion and patient reported outcomes. We will use reproducible, reliable, and validated metrics that include the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile and Penetration-Aspiration Scale to distinguish the mechanistic effects of RST. The goal of this current study is to extend the investigator's preliminary trial that yielded compelling physiologic changes with potential to improve the impact and durability of RST on clinical outcomes essential for eating, drinking, health, and quality-of-life. The investigators' overarching goal is to provide two parallel tracks of knowledge generation: 1) provide immediate clinical translation of experimental findings to improve the lives of Veterans, and 2) drive model generation on fundamental mechanisms of motor coordination. Basic knowledge will drive clinical application and vice-a-versa. As such, this is an ideal experimental and clinical context that will fuel knowledge generation in this highly significant area of science and clinical practice.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRespiratory Swallow Training

Training in the Optimal Respiratory Swallow Pattern and Lung Volume at Swallow Initiation

Sponsors

Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital
CollaboratorFED
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

outcomes assessor (those completed the swallow studies, those scoring)

Intervention model description

Randomized-controlled trial with 2 arms (intervention and control)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Veteran and non Veterans * have undergone treatment for a primary diagnosis of head and neck cancer (oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal) * are 21 years of age * 6 months post head and neck cancer treatment * 6 months post-traditional swallowing treatment with continued dysphagia * English speaking * pass a cognitive screening (score 26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) * do not present with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on pulmonary function testing (PFT) * drink less than 2 alcoholic beverages per day

Exclusion criteria

* if they have known allergy or dietary restriction for contrast materials or liquids used during the MBSS or training * currently drinking greater than two drinks per day * severe COPD * are unable to swallow one liquid consistency without the use of a compensatory strategy or swallow maneuver without aspiration * history of aspiration pneumonia within the past 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) ScoreBaseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 daysThe MBSImP is a standardized outcome measure that evaluates swallowing physiology using 17 distinct component scores across the oral (components 1-6), pharyngeal (components 7-16), and esophageal (component 17) domains. Each component is rated on an ordinal scale based on specific physiologic impairments. Scores range from a minimum of 0 (no impairment) to a maximum of 2, 3, or 4, depending on the component. Higher scores indicate greater swallowing dysfunction, reflecting worse outcomes. For this analysis, the pharyngeal total (PT) score was used as a primary outcome measure. The PT score provides a comprehensive measure of overall pharyngeal function and is a sum of components 7 through 16. The PT Score ranges from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater severity of impairment in pharyngeal swallowing function. A score of 0 represents no impairment, while a score of 32 represents the most severe impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) ScoreBaseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 daysMeasures the presence, depth, and reaction to penetration and aspiration during swallowing as observed through videofluoroscopy. The PAS is scored on an 8-point ordinal scale, with values ranging from 1 (no airway entry) to 8 (silent aspiration, with material passing below the vocal folds and no response). Higher scores indicate greater severity of airway compromise, reflecting worse outcomes in terms of swallowing safety.
MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite ScoreBaseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 daysA patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the impact of dysphagia on quality of life in individuals with head and neck cancer. The MDADI includes 20 items scored across three subscales: Emotional, Functional, and Physical. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree), with lower scores indicating worse quality of life related to dysphagia. The Composite Score is calculated by summing the scores from the Emotional, Functional, and Physical subscales. A score of 20 indicates the worst possible quality of life related to dysphagia, while a score of 100 indicates the best possible quality of life.
Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) ScoreBaseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 daysAssesses the level of oral intake in individuals with dysphagia. The FOIS is scored on a 7-point ordinal scale, ranging from 1 (nothing by mouth) to 7 (full oral intake with no restrictions). Higher scores indicate better functional oral intake and less dependence on alternative feeding methods.
Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales ScoresBaseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 daysEvaluates the functional impact of head and neck cancer on patients' ability to eat and communicate. The PSS-HN includes three subscales: Normalcy of Diet, Understandability of Speech, and Eating in Public, each scored on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better performance and less functional impairment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow Training
Description: Participants receive Respiratory-Swallow Training (RST) immediately after baseline evaluation. RST retrains swallowing initiation to occur during exhalation at mid-to-low lung volumes. Intervention Schedule: Begins within 1 week of baseline evaluation and continues for 4 weeks (two 1-hour sessions per week). Post-RST Assessment: Conducted within 1-week post-intervention and at 1-, 3-, and 6-months to assess efficacy and durability.
28
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow Training
Description: Participants receive no active intervention for the first 4 weeks post-baseline, then begin Respiratory-Swallow Training (RST) using the same protocol as Arm 1. Intervention Schedule: Begins 4 weeks after baseline evaluation and continues for 4 weeks (two 1-hour sessions per week). Post-RST Assessment: Conducted within 1-week post-intervention and at 1-, 3-, and 6-months to assess efficacy and durability.
21
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingTotalArm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow Training
Age, Continuous66 years65 years65 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants48 Participants27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants39 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants43 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 280 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 281 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score

The MBSImP is a standardized outcome measure that evaluates swallowing physiology using 17 distinct component scores across the oral (components 1-6), pharyngeal (components 7-16), and esophageal (component 17) domains. Each component is rated on an ordinal scale based on specific physiologic impairments. Scores range from a minimum of 0 (no impairment) to a maximum of 2, 3, or 4, depending on the component. Higher scores indicate greater swallowing dysfunction, reflecting worse outcomes. For this analysis, the pharyngeal total (PT) score was used as a primary outcome measure. The PT score provides a comprehensive measure of overall pharyngeal function and is a sum of components 7 through 16. The PT Score ranges from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater severity of impairment in pharyngeal swallowing function. A score of 0 represents no impairment, while a score of 32 represents the most severe impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

Population: Of the 49 subjects who entered the intervention phase, 40 were included in the final analysis. Nine participants withdrew.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score30 days9.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.01
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score120 days10.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.66
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score60 days10.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.66
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score240 days12.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) ScoreBaseline11.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score240 days11.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.37
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) ScoreBaseline12.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.62
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score30 days10.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.77
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score60 days11.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingModified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) Pharyngeal Total (PT) Score120 days10.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
Secondary

Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score

Assesses the level of oral intake in individuals with dysphagia. The FOIS is scored on a 7-point ordinal scale, ranging from 1 (nothing by mouth) to 7 (full oral intake with no restrictions). Higher scores indicate better functional oral intake and less dependence on alternative feeding methods.

Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

Population: Of the 49 subjects who entered the intervention phase, 40 were included in the final analysis. Nine participants withdrew.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score30 days5.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score120 days5.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score60 days5.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score240 days5.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) ScoreBaseline5.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score240 days6.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) ScoreBaseline5.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score30 days5.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score60 days5.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingFunctional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Score120 days5.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Secondary

Maximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score

Measures the presence, depth, and reaction to penetration and aspiration during swallowing as observed through videofluoroscopy. The PAS is scored on an 8-point ordinal scale, with values ranging from 1 (no airway entry) to 8 (silent aspiration, with material passing below the vocal folds and no response). Higher scores indicate greater severity of airway compromise, reflecting worse outcomes in terms of swallowing safety.

Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

Population: Of the 49 subjects who entered the intervention phase, 40 were included in the final analysis. Nine participants withdrew.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score30 days3.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score120 days3.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) ScoreBaseline4.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score240 days4.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score60 days4.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score240 days4.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) ScoreBaseline4.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score30 days3.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score60 days3.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMaximum Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) Score120 days4.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score

A patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the impact of dysphagia on quality of life in individuals with head and neck cancer. The MDADI includes 20 items scored across three subscales: Emotional, Functional, and Physical. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree), with lower scores indicating worse quality of life related to dysphagia. The Composite Score is calculated by summing the scores from the Emotional, Functional, and Physical subscales. A score of 20 indicates the worst possible quality of life related to dysphagia, while a score of 100 indicates the best possible quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

Population: Of the 49 subjects who entered the intervention phase, 40 were included in the final analysis. Nine participants withdrew.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score30 days64.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.81
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score120 days67.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.93
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score60 days66.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.25
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score240 days68.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.49
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite ScoreBaseline63.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.83
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score240 days71.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.81
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite ScoreBaseline59.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.67
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score30 days64.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.76
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score60 days67.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.08
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite Score120 days70.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.22
Secondary

Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores

Evaluates the functional impact of head and neck cancer on patients' ability to eat and communicate. The PSS-HN includes three subscales: Normalcy of Diet, Understandability of Speech, and Eating in Public, each scored on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better performance and less functional impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 240 days

Population: Of the 49 subjects who entered the intervention phase, 40 were included in the final analysis. Nine participants withdrew.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores60 days PSS-HN Speech89.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.81
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores30 days PSS-HN Diet60.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.64
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores240 days PSS-HN Public76.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.02
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores60 days PSS-HN Diet60.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.29
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores120 days PSS-HN Speech92.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.05
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores120 days PSS-HN Diet63.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.29
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores120 days PSS-HN Public76.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.09
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores240 days PSS-HN Diet69.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.02
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores240 days PSS-HN Speech92.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.02
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales ScoresBaseline PSS-HN Public73.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.54
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales ScoresBaseline PSS-HN Speech92.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.75
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores30 days PSS-HN Public73.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.91
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales ScoresBaseline PSS-HN Diet59.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.31
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores60 days PSS-HN Public77.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.19
Arm 1. Immediate Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores30 days PSS-HN Speech90.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.01
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores60 days PSS-HN Public72.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.11
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores30 days PSS-HN Speech90.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.61
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores120 days PSS-HN Public82.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.29
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores240 days PSS-HN Public90.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.23
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales ScoresBaseline PSS-HN Speech85.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.87
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores60 days PSS-HN Speech93.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.57
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores120 days PSS-HN Speech85.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.08
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores240 days PSS-HN Speech88.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.06
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales ScoresBaseline PSS-HN Diet60.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.39
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores30 days PSS-HN Diet67.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.53
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores60 days PSS-HN Diet61.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.05
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores120 days PSS-HN Diet68.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores240 days PSS-HN Diet78.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.51
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales ScoresBaseline PSS-HN Public85.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.51
Arm 2. Delayed Respiratory-Swallow TrainingPerformance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) Subscales Scores30 days PSS-HN Public81.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.59

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026