Skip to content

The Effect of Video and Traditional Laryngoscopy on Hemodynamic Response in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients

The Effect of Video and Traditional Laryngoscopy on Hemodynamic Response in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03376828
Acronym
Laryngoscopy
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-12-19
Start date
2016-05-25
Completion date
2018-05-25
Last updated
2018-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Anesthesia, Hypertension

Keywords

laryngoscopy, videolaryngoscopy, hypertension

Brief summary

During endotracheal intubation, it is known that la laryngoscopy has significant effects, such as tachycardia and blood pressure increase, which may be harmful, especially in those with cardiovascular disease. Different studies comparing laryngeal stimulation and there resulting hemodynamic response made with various intubation devices are available in the literature. The investigators planned to work with the hypothesis that endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopy would have less hemodynamic response traditional (Macintosh) laryngoscopy and the use of videolaryngoscopy would result in wider vision with less laryngeal stimulation.

Detailed description

In this study, in a study on endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia, a routine preparation of endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy or Macintosh laryngoscopy in adult hypertensive and normotensive patients between 18-75 years old, form will be written and recorded. Patient age, weight, height, sex, operation, co-morbid conditions and vital findings, measurements used in airway evaluation, initial trial success, laryngoscope using number of procedures, intubation tube number will be recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical program to compare the hemodynamic response of hypertensive and normotensive patients using videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope

Interventions

Endotracheal intubation time using the Macintosh laryngoscope

Endotracheal intubation time using the C-Mac Videolaryngoscope

Sponsors

Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-75 years. * Underwent surgery under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) IV, V patients * Preoperative systolic blood pressure 180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure a pressure above 110 mmHg. * Ejection fraction is less than 40%. * Difficult intubation history * Mallampati 3,4

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemodynamic response0-10 minuteChange from baseline noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intubation time0-120 secondsThe time elapsed between the passage of the laryngoscopy through the teeth to teeth
Glottic view gradeDuring intubationUsing the Cormack Lehane score

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026