Skip to content

Development & Pilot RCT of an Online Peer Support Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Assisted Individuals

Development & Pilot Randomized Control Trial (RCT) of an Online Peer Support Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Assisted Individuals Living in the Community

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03376711
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-12-18
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2017-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Affect, Social Support, Ventilators, Mechanical

Brief summary

Ventilator assisted individuals (VAIs) living at home are frail and generally cannot perform most daily activities. Although these individuals prefer to live at home, the family members who care for them often experience stress and poor health. Peer support can mitigate health declines by decreasing caregivers' isolation/stress and increasing their sense of control. However, no peer support programs are designed to meet these caregivers' complex and unique needs. Online support delivery is especially beneficial for caregivers given the geographic and time limitations they face. The proposed research aims to develop and conduct an RCT of online peer support program for VAI caregivers. A group of caregivers will be trained to act as peer mentors. This training program will be evaluated for its impact on caregivers' mentoring abilities. At the end of the 12-week program, caregiving participants will be asked about the online delivery of the program, how helpful/satisfactory it was, and if it affected their health and well-being. The health outcomes of the control and intervention group will be compared. This peer support program can improve the well-being of caregivers and allow them to better care for their family members.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOnline Peer Support Program

The online peer support program will entail: 1) Informational links; 2) A discussion forum (open to all participants and allowing for asynchronous contact between caregivers & peer mentors); 3) A weekly live chat; 4) Private messaging (audio, video, and text options); and 5) Ask-a-mentor (A short video/blurb profiling each caregiving mentor will be posted including details such as gender, age, duration of care, relationship to care-recipient, and illness that care-recipient suffers from). Caregiving participants can then self-match to a peer mentor they feel is best-positioned to address their support needs.

Sponsors

University of Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1\) age = 18 years; 2) primary family caregiver for a VAI living in the community; 3) able to speak and read English; and 4) access to a computer and a reliable internet connection.

Exclusion criteria

1\) currently experiencing severe depression as indicated by a score of 40 or higher on the Centre for epidemiological studies short depression scale (CES-D 10).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Positive and Negative AffectChange from baseline at 12 weeksPositive & Negative Affect Scale (PANAS): 10 items \[Score: 10-50\]; higher scores indicate more psychological wellbeing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility: Participation frequency12 weeksNumber of times that mentors and caregiving participants contribute to weekly chat and discussion forums over the course of 12 weeks. ).
Feasibility: Recruitment ratesThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearConsent rate for participation (i.e. proportion of individuals approached who consent to participate)
Feasibility: Attrition12 weeksAttrition rates (i.e. number of mentors and caregiving participants who participate in entire peer support program and complete required study questionnaires).
Change in CopingChange from baseline at 12 weeksBrief Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE) Inventory: 28 items representing problem and emotion-based coping. Higher scores on either subscale represent greater use of that coping style
Feasibility: Participation rate12 weeksProportion of mentors and caregiving participants who contribute to weekly chats and discussion forums for all 12 weeks of the program
Change in Caregiving ImpactChange from baseline at 12 weeksCaregiving Impact Scale: 14 items \[Score: 0-84\]; higher scores suggest providing care interferes with caregivers' abilities to maintain participation in valued activities
Change in MasteryChange from baseline at 12 weeksPearlin Mastery Scale: 7 items \[Score: 7-28\]; higher scores indicate a greater sense of control over life
Change in Personal GainChange from baseline at 12 weeksPersonal Gain Scale: 4 items \[Score: 4-16\]; higher scores indicate caregiver discovery of inner strengths due to providing care
Change in DepressionChange from baseline at 12 weeks) Centre for Epidemiological Studies Short Depression Scale (CES-D 10): 10 items \[Score: 0-30\]; higher scores sores indicate depression severity

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactMarina B Wasilewski, PhD
marina.bastawrous@utoronto.ca416-666-8732
Backup ContactLouise Rose, PhD
louise.rose@utoronto.ca416 978 3492

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026