Skip to content

Local Wound Infiltration Plus TAP Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration Only

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Local Wound Infiltration Plus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Local Wound Infiltration Only After Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: a Randomized, Double-blind, Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03376048
Enrollment
108
Registered
2017-12-18
Start date
2017-12-20
Completion date
2019-12-30
Last updated
2020-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Disorders

Brief summary

The TAP block is typically performed either with ultrasound guidance (TAP-US) or laparoscopic visualization (TAP-LAP): comparison between these two technics showed no differences in pain control and use of opioid analgesics. The investigators hypothesize that WI is non-inferior to WI + TAP-block with respect to postoperative pain.

Detailed description

In colorectal surgery, laparoscopy and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have significantly improved the short-term outcomes (1). Although the laparoscopic approach reduces pain and recovery time, post-operative pain, nausea and vomiting still represent an issue. In order to reduce opioid related side effects, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), constipation and prolonged post-operative ileus, non-opioid based multimodal analgesia have been recently introduced. Although epidural analgesia has gained good success, it does not seem to offer any additional clinical benefits to patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared to alternative analgesic technique within an ERAS program. Both local wound infiltration (WI) and TAP block are common techniques in multimodal postoperative pain treatment, and their association allows to achieve pain control despite a reduced use of opioid analgesics. Furthermore, in a recent single-blind prospective study TAP block resulted superior to wound infiltration alone. The TAP block is typically performed either with ultrasound guidance (TAP-US) or laparoscopic visualization (TAP-LAP): comparison between these two technics showed no differences in pain control and use of opioid analgesics. The aim of this study is to compare WI + TAP-LAP versus WI alone. The investigators hypothesize that WI is non-inferior to WI + TAP-block with respect to postoperative pain.

Interventions

PROCEDUREWound infiltration plus TAP

1. TAP block: At the beginning of the main surgical procedure the surgeon will perform a TAP with ropivacaine infiltration, bilaterally in the anterior axillary line, between the costal margin and iliac crest in the intermuscular plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles, the anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance, the surgeon under laparoscopic guidance (two pops technique). 2. Wound infiltration : Wound infiltration of ropivacaine will be performed by the surgeon before skin incision.

PROCEDUREWound infiltration

Wound infiltration of ropivacaine will be performed by the surgeon before skin incision.

Sponsors

Kyungpook National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-80 years, either sex * Patients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery under general anesthesia * Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* Allergies to anesthetic or analgesic medications * Contraindication to the use of locoregional anesthesia * Chronic opioid use * Coagulopathy, Impaired kidney function, uncontrolled diabetes, psychiatric disorders, severe cardiovascular impairment or chronic obstructive lung disease * Necessity of major resection other than colorectal, palliative surgery * BMI above 35 kg/m2 * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status above 3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain numerical rating scale (NRS)within the first 6 hours after surgery1. Pain NRS during rest and cough 2. NRS scale 0-10: 0, no pain; 10, worst pain imaginable

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rescue opioid analgesic requirementpostoperative day 0, 1, 2, 3Overall postoperative rescue of opioid analgesic requirement described by using the Defined Daily Dose
Postoperative nausea and vomiting scale12, 24, 36, 48, 72 hour after surgeryPONV scores (assessed using a 0 - 2 categorical scale; no nausea/ nausea/ vomiting)
Occurrence of prolonged post-operative ileus8 weeks after surgeryOccurrence of prolonged post-operative ileus (assessed using a 0 - 1 categorical scale; no ileus/ileus)
Pain NRS12, 24, 36, 48, 72 hour after surgery1. Pain NRS during rest and cough 2. NRS scale 0-10: 0, no pain; 10, worst pain imaginable
Time to first oral soft diet8 weeks after surgeryTime to first oral soft diet after surgery
Length of hospital stay8 weeks after surgeryLength of hospital stay after admission
Time to first oral fluid intake8 weeks after surgeryTime to first oral fluid intake after surgery

Countries

Italy, South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026