Skip to content

Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy vs. Conventional Radiotherapy for Cancer Pain

A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy vs. Conventional Radiotherapy for Cancer Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03374592
Enrollment
73
Registered
2017-12-15
Start date
2014-07-07
Completion date
2018-02-21
Last updated
2022-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasm Metastasis, Pain, Quality of Life, Radiotherapy Side Effect

Keywords

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy, Radiotherapy, Pain, Metastasis, Quality of Life, Acute Toxicity

Brief summary

This study compares the use of conventional radiotherapy technique with volumetric intensity-modulated radiotherapy (VMAT) in the treatment of painful cancer metastases. Half of the patients will receive radiotherapy using a conventional technique, while the other half will receive their treatment using a the VMAT technique.

Detailed description

Radiotherapy to painful sites of metastasis can provide pain relief. Side-effects from radiotherapy is dependent on the volume and dose received by normal tissues. Conventional radiotherapy techniques delivers similar doses of radiation to the targeted cancer lesion and the normal tissues along the entrance and exit paths of the radiation. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is an advanced technique of radiotherapy that spares normal tissues from receiving high-dose irradiation. However, VMAT increases the volume of normal tissues receiving low-dose irradiation. This study aims at comparing the quality of life and side-effect profiles of patients treated by palliative radiotherapy using the conventional technique vs. VMAT.

Interventions

RADIATIONVolumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy

Advanced radiotherapy technique

RADIATIONConventional Radiotherapy

Conventional radiotherapy technique

Sponsors

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Pain (SF-BPI score ≥1) should be related to metastases (bone or others) or to the tumor itself 2. Capable of providing the full list of analgesic medication being used 3. Capable of completing the SF-BPI and EORTC questionnaires without any help 4. Life expectancy of at least 3 month 5. KPS greater or equal to 50 6. Radiotherapy to 1 site pain 7. Site of treatment not previously irradiated 8. No planned changes in analgesic within 7 days before and after treatment • Patient may be started on Dexamethasone on the first day of radiotherapy 9. No planned chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery within 7 days before and after treatment 10. Patient provided informed consent to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

1. Major mental or psychiatric impairments, which in the investigator's opinion will prevent administration or completion of the protocol therapy and/or interfere with follow-up. 2. Treatment to upper and lower limb 3. Treatment to 2 or more sites of pain 4. Re-irradiation of the site of treatment 5. Women who are pregnant 6. Life expectancy less than 3 month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life (QOL)1 weekThe global QOL subscale will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. The global QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). Higher scores represent better global QOL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life - Symptom subscales3 monthQuality of life symptom subscales (dyspnea, pain, fatigue, appetite loss, nausea, constipation, and diarrhea symptoms) will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). For symptom subscales, higher scores represent worse symptoms.
Quality of Life - Function subscales3 monthQuality of life function subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social and financial functions) will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). For function subscales, higher scores represent better function.
Pain relief1 weekPain response to radiotherapy as defined by the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions
Toxicities1 weekDescriptive tabulation of toxicities related to radiotherapy as defined by CTCAE v4

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood biomarkers1 weekChange in cytokine levels in blood following radiotherapy as a biomarker of response to radiotherapy
Physical activity1 weekChange in the daily number of steps taken by patients before and after radiotherapy as measured using an activity tracker
Resource utilizationBaselineTime spent in planning and delivering radiotherapy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026