Skip to content

Cerebral Palsy: Short-burst Interval Training

Muscle Performance and Walking in Cerebral Palsy: Short-burst Interval Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03373890
Enrollment
12
Registered
2017-12-14
Start date
2014-08-01
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2019-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia

Brief summary

This study examines the effect of short burst interval treadmill training in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Half the sample will receive 20 sessions of training over 4 weeks, while half will receive the training over 10 weeks.

Detailed description

Ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP) experience activity limitations which negatively influence their ability to physically participate in day to day life. Therefore, these children are at greater risk for inactivity and functional decline with age. In contrast, typically developing (TD) children engage in short bursts of intense physical activity interspersed with varying intervals of low and moderate intensity within their natural environment. These physical activity patterns are very different from adult patterns Despite these inherent differences, locomotor treadmill training (LTT) protocols designed to improve walking activity in children with CP simulate adult protocols, consisting of continuous low to moderate walking endurance activity. Body weight supported or robot assisted LTT is based on the underlying premise of modifying neural circuitry via spinal pathways. However, this type of training has not been shown to be more effective than other comparable interventions and presents with significant fiscal and logistical barriers to clinical translation. This study will determine the effect of short-burst interval LTT without body weight support on the primary outcomes of walking performance and capacity and the secondary outcomes of day-to-day mobility based participation in children with CP with functional walking limitations. To identify key muscular mechanisms associated with improved walking mobility, the investigators will examine the effects of short-burst interval LTT on quadriceps muscle performance and architecture. Secondarily, the study team will collect preliminary data on two LTT dosing frequencies.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALShort Burst Interval Locomotor Treadmill Training (SBLTT)

SBLTT consists of interval training consisting of short-bursts (30 seconds) of vigorous intensity locomotor treadmill training (LTT) alternating with low to moderate intensity LTT.,

Sponsors

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans
CollaboratorOTHER
Seattle Children's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Muscle function assessor masked to frequency group, Muscle architecture captured via ultrasound Community walking activity collected by accelerometry, thus non-human data collection

Intervention model description

Pre/post intervention design with participants randomized to two different frequency of intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory children with cerebral palsy Spasticity primary movement disorder Bilateral motor impairment (Diplegia) Gross Motor Function Classification System Levels II and III

Exclusion criteria

* undergone orthopedic or neurosurgery less than 12 months prior injection therapies (phenol, botulinum toxin) less than 3 months prior

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Walking Performance High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT GroupsChange from baseline to immediately post SBLTTAverage stride per day as measured by StepWatch accelerometry. StepWatch accelerometer stride counts per day ( minimum of 8 hrs/day wearing time) were averaged a crossed 5 days (4 weekdays and 1 weekend day) to create Average Strides/day variable
Change in Community Walking Performance Intensity High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT GroupsChange from baseline to immediately post SBLTTAverage Strides/day \> 30 strides/min as measured by StepWatch accelerometry High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups
Change in Walking Capacity High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT GroupsChange from baseline to immediately post SBLT.Self selected walking speed as measured by 10 meter walk test High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups
Change in Walking Endurance- High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT GroupsChange from baseline to immediately post SBLTTDistance walked during the One Minute Walk Test High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Muscle Performance -Power High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT GroupsChange from baseline to 6 weeks post SBLTTKnee extensor muscle power - isotonic muscle power as measured by Biodex testing High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups
Change in Muscle Performance - Strength High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT GroupsChange from baseline to immediately post SBLTTKnee extensor muscle strength - isometric muscle strength as measured by Biodex testing High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups
Change in Muscle Architecture-High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT GroupsChange from baseline to immediately post SBLTTRectus femoris mid thigh cross-sectional area as measured by 2D B Mode Ultrasound High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups
Change in Muscle Architecture-hypertrophy High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT GroupsChange from baseline to immediately post SBLTTRectus femoris mid thigh fascicle length as measured by 2D B Mode Ultrasound High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited through a directed mailing to children with cerebral palsy receiving care at Seattle Children's Hospital between Sept 1, 2014 and June 30 2015.

Pre-assignment details

In eligible if unable to walk at greater than their self selected walking speeds with orthotics on a treadmill.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Short Burst Interval Treadmill Training High Frequency
All participants receive short burst interval treadmill training for a total of 20 sessions. They are randomized to receive it either 5x/week for 4 weeks Short Burst Interval Locomotor Treadmill Training (SBLTT): SBLTT consists of interval training consisting of short-bursts (30 seconds) of vigorous intensity locomotor treadmill training (LTT) alternating with low to moderate intensity LTT.
6
Short Burst Interval Treadmill Training Low Frequency
All participants receive short burst interval treadmill training for a total of 20 sessions. They are randomized to receive it either 2x/week for 10 weeks Short Burst Interval Locomotor Treadmill Training (SBLTT): SBLTT consists of interval training consisting of short-bursts (30 seconds) of vigorous intensity locomotor treadmill training (LTT) alternating with low to moderate intensity LTT.
6
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicShort Burst Interval Treadmill Training High FrequencyShort Burst Interval Treadmill Training Low FrequencyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous7.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
9.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
8.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 60 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Community Walking Performance Intensity High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Average Strides/day \> 30 strides/min as measured by StepWatch accelerometry High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately post SBLTT

Population: Change in average strides/day \> 30 strides/min as measured by StepWatch accelerometry for one side a cross 5 days (4 weekdays and 1 weekend day)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Frequency 5x/WeekChange in Community Walking Performance Intensity High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups866 strides per dayStandard Error 652
Low Frequency 2x WeekChange in Community Walking Performance Intensity High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups731 strides per dayStandard Error 522
p-value: 0.39Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Walking Capacity High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Self selected walking speed as measured by 10 meter walk test High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately post SBLT.

Population: Change in self selected walking speed between baseline and immediately post SBLTT was compared between the high and low frequency groups/arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Frequency 5x/WeekChange in Walking Capacity High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups.21 meters per secStandard Deviation 0.3
Low Frequency 2x WeekChange in Walking Capacity High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups-.08 meters per secStandard Deviation 0.2
p-value: 0.03Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Walking Endurance- High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Distance walked during the One Minute Walk Test High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately post SBLTT

Population: Change in distance walked in one minute between baseline and immediately post SBLTT compared between high and low frequency groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Frequency 5x/WeekChange in Walking Endurance- High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups13.8 metersStandard Deviation 2.5
Low Frequency 2x WeekChange in Walking Endurance- High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups8.8 metersStandard Deviation 2.6
p-value: 0.39Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Walking Performance High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Average stride per day as measured by StepWatch accelerometry. StepWatch accelerometer stride counts per day ( minimum of 8 hrs/day wearing time) were averaged a crossed 5 days (4 weekdays and 1 weekend day) to create Average Strides/day variable

Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately post SBLTT

Population: Change in average strides/day from baseline to immediately post SBLTT were compared between the high and low frequency groups/arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Frequency 5x/WeekChange in Walking Performance High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups1872 strides per dayStandard Deviation 880
Low Frequency 2x WeekChange in Walking Performance High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups1551 strides per dayStandard Deviation 952
p-value: 0.39Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Muscle Architecture-High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Rectus femoris mid thigh cross-sectional area as measured by 2D B Mode Ultrasound High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately post SBLTT

Population: Change in rectus femoris cross sectional area as measured by 2D B Mode ultrasound, from baseline to immediately post SBLTT compared between high and low frequency groups/arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Frequency 5x/WeekChange in Muscle Architecture-High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups.05 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.02
Low Frequency 2x WeekChange in Muscle Architecture-High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups0 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.03
p-value: 0.008Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change in Muscle Architecture-hypertrophy High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Rectus femoris mid thigh fascicle length as measured by 2D B Mode Ultrasound High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately post SBLTT

Population: Change in rectus femoris mid thigh fascicle length as measured by 2D B Mode ultrasound , from baseline to immediately post SBLTT compared between high and low frequency groups/arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Frequency 5x/WeekChange in Muscle Architecture-hypertrophy High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups.06 millimetersStandard Deviation 0.12
Low Frequency 2x WeekChange in Muscle Architecture-hypertrophy High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups.05 millimetersStandard Deviation 0.13
p-value: 0.34Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Muscle Performance -Power High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Knee extensor muscle power - isotonic muscle power as measured by Biodex testing High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks post SBLTT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Frequency 5x/WeekChange in Muscle Performance -Power High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups1.2 wattsStandard Deviation 0.11
Low Frequency 2x WeekChange in Muscle Performance -Power High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups1.9 wattsStandard Deviation 0.19
p-value: 0.06Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Muscle Performance - Strength High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Knee extensor muscle strength - isometric muscle strength as measured by Biodex testing High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups

Time frame: Change from baseline to immediately post SBLTT

Population: Change in normalized isometric quadriceps strength as measured by Biodex, from baseline to immediately post SBLTT compared between high and low frequency groups/arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Frequency 5x/WeekChange in Muscle Performance - Strength High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups.13 newton metersStandard Deviation 0.25
Low Frequency 2x WeekChange in Muscle Performance - Strength High Versus Low Frequency SBLTT Groups.14 newton metersStandard Deviation 0.5
p-value: 0.99Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026