Skip to content

Snuff-box Deep Palmar Arch Artery Versus Radial Angiography

Snuff-box Deep Palmar Arch Artery Versus Radial Angiography

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03373565
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-12-14
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2017-12-30
Last updated
2017-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease

Brief summary

Angiography is a common diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The complications are variable between mild self-limited complications to severe life-threatening complications which need early interventions. New angiographic methods are associated with variable complications. Death, myocardial infarction, and stroke are among major angiography complications. In addition, some local complications including bleeding at the site of insertion, infection, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and thrombosis is reported after angiography. Radial and femoral methods are common angiographic methods. Its shown that radial method is associated with less complications and patients need shorter duration of hospitalization. Radial artery thrombosis is common complication of radial angiography. However, the prevalence is between 5 to 19 percent but often it is not clinically important. Risk of ischemia due to thrombosis is low because of blood flow in radial and ulnar and collaterals. In patients with incomplete palmar arch this is important and may cause ischemia. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of coronary angiography using Snuff-box deep palmar arch artery and radial artery in patients attending angiography center of Shahid Mohammadi hospital in Bandar Abbas in 2017.

Interventions

PROCEDURERadial

Coronary angiography using radial approach

PROCEDUREPalmar

Coronary angiography using radial approach

Sponsors

Hamidreza Mahboobi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* indication of coronary artery angiography confirmed by a cardiologist * Accepting to sign the written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* No follow up visit after one-month period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thrombosis1 monthsThrombosis at the site of angiography using ultrasonography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection1 monthsNumber of patients with infection at the site of angiography in physical examnination
Pain1 monthsNumber of patients with pain at the site of angiography using questionnaire
Numbness1 monthsNumber of patients with numbness at the site of angiography using questionnaire
Loss of movement1 monthsNumber of patients with loss of movement at the site of angiography in physical examination

Countries

Iran

Contacts

Primary ContactHosein Farshidi, M.D
hfarshidi6@gmail.com09173613517

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026