Breast Cancer Lymphedema
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to clarify whether local-distal point association is more effective than local point association by warm acupuncture in the management of breast cancer related lymphedema.
Interventions
OTHERlocal distribution points association
Participants will receive acupuncture treatments using the local points set plus the local-addition points set (local distribution association) described below. Warming acupuncture will be applied at HT2, LI11, and TE9 if permitted. Local points set: TE5, LI11, TE9, HT3, TE13, and Xiajiquan on the affected arm. Local-addition points set: LU5, PC3, SI7, TE4, TE3, HT2, TE10, LI15, and 2 other points according to the symptom on the affected arm.
OTHERlocal-distal points association
Participants will receive acupuncture treatments using the local points set plus the distal points set (local-distal association) described below. Warming acupuncture will be applied similarly to the local distribution group, with the addition of Ren6, Ren9, bilateral SP9, and LI11 on the unaffected arm. Local points set: TE5, LI11, TE9, HT3, TE13, and Xiajiquan on the affected arm. Distal points set: TE5, LI11, HT3, TE13 on the unaffected arm; CV4, CV6, CV9, CV12, bilateral SP6 and SP9.
Sponsors
National Basic Research Program, China
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* At least 6 months after breast cancer surgery and presents with persistent breast cancer related upper extremity lymphedema for at least 3 months. Upper extremity lymphedema is defined as more than 2cm circumference difference or 5% volume difference between the affected and unaffected arms. * Stage II or III lymphedema according to the 2016 consensus by the international society of lymphology. * Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) ≥ 70 * Men or women aged 18 to 80 years * Out-patients * Estimated life expectancy \> 6 months
Exclusion criteria
* Bilateral breast cancer related lymphedema * Taking diuretic * History of primary lymphedema * A diagnosis of severe heart, liver, kidney or hematologic disease * Edema caused by upper extremity disability or other conditions such as heart failure, kidney disease or malnutrition * Have hypoproteinemia * Inflammation, scar, or trauma at the site of operation, or other active skin infections * Unable to self-care, had a history of psychological disorders, or unable to communicate * Received lymphedema treatment within the past 1 month * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * The presence of electronic medical device implants * Deny to sign the informed written consent, or unwilling to conform to randomization * Participation in other clinical trials during the study period
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Upper extremity circumference | 80 weeks | Various assessment methods are available but circumference measure is simple, convenient with low cost, and reliable. Therefore, the primary outcome measures will be the mean change in inter-limb circumference difference from baseline to the end of the 8-week intervention. The circumference will be measured by the measurement tape (Gulick Attachment, Baseline, America) at the wrist crease, 10 cm above the wrist crease, elbow crease, 10 cm above the elbow crease, where the lymphedema is most severe and its corresponding location on the unaffected limb. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Upper extremity volume | 80 weeks | Volume measurement is also commonly used for the evaluation of lymphedema and the mean change in inter-limb volume difference from baseline to the end of the 8-week intervention will be included as the second primary outcome measure. The volume of the affected and unaffected limb will be measured by the volumetric measuring device (Baseline, America) using the water displacement method, which is considered as the most reliable method for volume measurements. |
| Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE 4.03) - edema limbs criteria | 80 weeks | Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE 4.03) will be used to grade the severity of swelling using the edema limbs criteria. A grading of mild, moderate or severe swelling will be assessed based on the inter-limb circumference or volume discrepancy, anatomic architecture, appearance, or activities of daily living. The CTCAE 4.03 will allow us to evaluate the clinical significance of circumference change. |
| Stages of lymphedema from the international society of lymphology | 80 weeks | Stages of lymphedema from the international society of lymphology will be used to grade the severity of lymphedema. Staging of 0, I, II, or III will be assessed based on severity of swelling, ability to reduce swelling by elevation, and skin changes. |
| The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure | 80 weeks | Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) is a scale consists of two concepts: functional status (part A) and symptoms (part B) respectively. The functional status part is further divided into three dimensions: physical, social, and psychological. The total score of the DASH ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing worse symptoms and function. The DASH has good validity and responsiveness and it is recommended to assess upper extremity function in breast cancer survivors. The validated Chinese version of the DASH will be used in this study. |
| The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) | 80 weeks | The medical outcome study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) is a commonly used instrument to assess quality of life that has good validity. The SF-36 includes the following eight concepts: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perception. The validated Chinese version of the SF-36 will be used in this study. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed