Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Keywords
catheter ablation, intraprocedural left atrial wall thickness imaging
Brief summary
One of the biggest limitations of the currently used percutaneous techniques for Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) in the setting of atrial fibrillation ablation is the lack of real-time information about the left atrial (LA) wall thickness and about its acute changes during energy delivery for ablation. This makes difficult to predict the achievement of transmural lesions, to identify the possible causes of ablation failure and also to avoid the occurrence of perforation and/or other collateral damage. Computed tomography (CT) is a reliable technique for measurement of the LA wall thickness but it cannot be used during the ablation procedure and its extensive use is limited by the need of ionizing radiation. Preliminary data from animal studies support the accuracy of real-time ultrasound imaging modalities such as intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) or Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for measurement of LA wall thickness and monitoring of its acute changes related to catheter ablation. The pilot study INSIDE PVs has been primarily designed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of intravascular imaging techniques for real-time imaging of the LA wall thickness during AF ablation.
Detailed description
Patients scheduled for their first pulmonary vein (PV) isolation ablation for symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), will be considered for inclusion in the study. Potential subjects will initially be approached some weeks before their ablation procedure, in order to give the patients enough time to consider the information, to ask questions to the Investigator, their general practitioner (GP) or other independent parties to decide whether they wish to participate in the study or not. For those interested in participation, a baseline assessment will be arranged to coincide with their standard pre-admission visit, for informed consent, screening and eligibility assessment. Moreover, a pre-operative imaging assessment with a cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan will be performed to define the left atrial (LA) and PV anatomy and to measure the baseline LA wall thickness and PVs ostial diameters. All AF ablation procedures will be performed in a standard fashion by using radiofrequency (RF) energy, cryo-balloon or laser balloon ablation under general anaesthesia and with continuous oesophageal temperature monitoring. Ultrasound imaging by IVUS (Visions PV .018, 20 MHz digital probe, Volcano Corp) or ICE (Ultra ICE (9 MHz rotational transducer, Boston Scientific) will be performed at sites corresponding with the PV/LA junction at the beginning and the end of the procedure in order to measure acute changes in LA wall thickness and PV ostial diameters. The cardiac CT will be repeated within 24 hours post-procedure. After the procedure, a pre-discharge review and a telephone follow-up at 1 week will be performed to identify any early and late complications related to the procedure. A total of 14 patients will finally be enrolled in the study. The end of the study for each patient will be the date of the telephone follow-up 1 week after the procedure. For each patient the pre-procedural and post-procedural CT measurements of LA wall thickness and PVs ostial diameters will be compared with the corresponding IVUS or ICE measurements.
Interventions
Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the left atrial wall thickness with ICE/IVUS during atrial fibrillation ablation
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Inclusion Criteria * Males older than 40 years or females older than 40 and sterile or in post-menopausal age; * willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study; * history of symptomatic and drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF); * planned AF ablation on a clinical basis. *
Exclusion criteria
* age less than 40 years and more than 80 years; * pregnancy, trying for a baby or breast feeding; * any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study; * documented allergy to iodinated contrast medium; * renal insufficiency (eGFR\<30); * weight exceeding the maximum load of the scanner (250kg).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness on ICE/IVUS Frames | Day 1 | Left atrial wall thickness at the PV ostia, measured as Wall Thickness Index % = \[(vessel area - lumen area)/vessel area\] x 100 |
| Measurement of LA Wall Thickness on CT Scans | 1 day | Left atrial wall thickness at the PV ostia, measured as Wall Thickness Index % = \[(vessel area - lumen area)/vessel area\] x 100 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Time Required for ICE/IVUS for Real Time Imaging of the Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness During AF Ablation | Day 1 | Mean time required to image the left atrium for measurement of left atrial wall thickness with intracardiac echo (ICE) or with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) |
| Number of ICE/IVUS Cases of Good Quality | Day 1 | Number of intracardiac echo (ICE) cases and number of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) cases of good quality, allowing a precise measurement of the left atrial (LA) wall thickness The imaging quality of each PV cross-section was defined as good quality if the vessel contour was visible in all 4 quadrants. |
Countries
United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment performed from November 2016 to October 2017 in Cardiology Outpatient Clinic. A total of 14 patients enrolled. 2 patients had incomplete datasets so 12 patients available for analysis.
Pre-assignment details
Two recruited patients were not included in the data analysis because of * no intravascular ultrasound imaging available due to technical issue in 1 patient; * no post-operative CT scan performed by 1 patient.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intracardiac Echo (ICE) Imaging Pulmonary vein imaging performed during atrial fibrillation ablation with ICE | 7 |
| Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging Pulmonary vein imaging performed during atrial fibrillation ablation with IVUS | 5 |
| Total | 12 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Failure of imaging probe | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Patient not attending post-procedural CT scan | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intracardiac Echo (ICE) Imaging | Total | Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ablation modality for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Cryoenergy | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ablation modality for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Laser energy | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ablation modality for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Radiofrequency energy | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 65 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 64 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 | 63 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 7 Participants | 12 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 9 Participants | 4 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 7 | 0 / 5 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 7 | 0 / 5 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 7 | 0 / 5 |
Outcome results
Measurement of LA Wall Thickness on CT Scans
Left atrial wall thickness at the PV ostia, measured as Wall Thickness Index % = \[(vessel area - lumen area)/vessel area\] x 100
Time frame: 1 day
Population: The analysis was not possible as the CT images were inadvertently deleted before any analysis was performed.
Measurement of Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness on ICE/IVUS Frames
Left atrial wall thickness at the PV ostia, measured as Wall Thickness Index % = \[(vessel area - lumen area)/vessel area\] x 100
Time frame: Day 1
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intracardiac Echo (ICE) Imaging | Measurement of Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness on ICE/IVUS Frames | Pre-ablation | 22.18 percentage |
| Intracardiac Echo (ICE) Imaging | Measurement of Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness on ICE/IVUS Frames | Post-ablation | 27.04 percentage |
| Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging | Measurement of Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness on ICE/IVUS Frames | Pre-ablation | 23.15 percentage |
| Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging | Measurement of Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness on ICE/IVUS Frames | Post-ablation | 27.09 percentage |
Mean Time Required for ICE/IVUS for Real Time Imaging of the Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness During AF Ablation
Mean time required to image the left atrium for measurement of left atrial wall thickness with intracardiac echo (ICE) or with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
Time frame: Day 1
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intracardiac Echo (ICE) Imaging | Mean Time Required for ICE/IVUS for Real Time Imaging of the Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness During AF Ablation | 24.8 minutes | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging | Mean Time Required for ICE/IVUS for Real Time Imaging of the Left Atrial (LA) Wall Thickness During AF Ablation | 25 minutes | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
Number of ICE/IVUS Cases of Good Quality
Number of intracardiac echo (ICE) cases and number of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) cases of good quality, allowing a precise measurement of the left atrial (LA) wall thickness The imaging quality of each PV cross-section was defined as good quality if the vessel contour was visible in all 4 quadrants.
Time frame: Day 1
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intracardiac Echo (ICE) Imaging | Number of ICE/IVUS Cases of Good Quality | 24 Pulmonary Vein cross-sections |
| Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging | Number of ICE/IVUS Cases of Good Quality | 0 Pulmonary Vein cross-sections |