Skip to content

Montelukast and Loratadine in Children With Asthma

Safety and Efficacy of Montelukast + Loratadine vs. Montelukast for the Control of Mild to Moderate Persistent Asthma in Children: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03372473
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-12-13
Start date
2016-01-10
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2017-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma in Children

Brief summary

Randomized controlled trial in 80 children with mild to persistent moderate asthma, who were randomized to receive montelukast 5mg + loratadine 5mg vs. montelukast 5mg + placebo for loratadine to evaluate the efficacy in terms of improvement of symptoms. Secondary outcome was the days off without the use of rescue medication; reduction of levels of cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTS), nitric oxide (FeNO), intracellular adhesion molecule type 1 (ICAM-1) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) in condensed exhaled air; the improvement of day and night symptoms; the reduction in the frequency of night awakenings; the improvement in the quality of life; the percentage of related adverse events; the need to use systemic steroids; the number of visits to the emergency department secondary to the presence of an asthma attack; the number of hospitalizations secondary to asthma attacks; and the improvement in the percentage of FEV1 in relation to the predicted.

Detailed description

Asthma is a disease with increasing prevalence worldwide that produces significant deterioration of the quality of life in children and development of important complications and economic, social impact. Considering the concept of a common airway (coexistence of asthma and rhinitis), joint management initiatives with anti-asthmatics and anti-histamines have been published. The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of montelukast + loratadine in children with asthma on the improvement of symptoms and secondarily to evaluate the impact on a) the days off without the use of rescue medication; b) reduction of levels of cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTS), nitric oxide (FeNO), intracellular adhesion molecule type 1 (ICAM-1) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) in condensed exhaled air; c) the improvement of day and night symptoms; d) the reduction in the frequency of night awakenings; e) the improvement in the quality of life; f) the percentage of related adverse events; g) the need to use systemic steroids; h) the number of visits to the emergency department secondary to the presence of an asthma attack; i) the number of hospitalizations secondary to asthma attacks; and j) the improvement in the percentage of FEV1 in relation to the predicted. We included 80 children from 6 to 12 years old, any sex, with mild to moderate persistent asthma, after signing an informed consent letter by parents or guardians or signing the child's consent (\> 8 years). Children with chronic diseases associated with the disease of interest were excluded (heart disease, nephropathy, liver disease of any kind); with any other lung disease other than asthma; with a history of hypersensitivity to montelukast or loratadine or with a history of concomitant use of medications that interact significantly with montelukast or loratadine

Interventions

DRUGMontelukast mixed with Loratadine

Montelukast 5mg mixed with Loratadine 5mg, one dose per day

DRUGMontelukast

Montelukast 5mg

Sponsors

National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Laboratorios Senosiain, S.A. de C.V.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Innovacion y Desarrollo de Estrategias en Salud
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Children allocated on different arms will receive montelukast + loratadine vs. montelukast + placebo. Both product are identical in appearence and flavor

Intervention model description

Randomized clinical crossover trial, in 80 children who were allocated to receive montelukast + loratadine vs montelukast in two different periods of 4 weeks each, with a 2 weeks of wash-out between periods of treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age from 6 to 12 years old * Any sex * Persistent mild to moderate asthma * Signature of informed consent letter by parents or guardians * Letter of assent of the minor for children over 9 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic pathologies associated with the disease of interest (heart disease, nephropathy, liver disease of any kind) * Any other lung disease other than asthma * History of hypersensitivity to montelukast or loratadine * Concomitant use of medications that interact significantly with montelukast or loratadine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Free of symptoms10 weeksNumber of days free of symptoms associated to asthma episodes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of airway inflammatory profile10 weeksMeasurement of inflamatory biomarkers in exhaled respiratory air
Reduction of awakenings10 weeksFrequency of nocturn awakenings
Free of rescue medication10 weeksNumber of days free for use of rescue medications
Emergency visits10 weeksNumber of emergency visits secondary to asthma crisis
Adverse Events10 weeksFrequency of reported adverse events
Quality of Life10 weeksChanges in PedsQL during the treatment

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026