Skip to content

A Study of Duvelisib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)

A Multi-Center, Phase 2, Open-label, Parallel Cohort Study of Efficacy and Safety of Duvelisib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03372057
Acronym
PRIMO
Enrollment
156
Registered
2017-12-13
Start date
2018-02-22
Completion date
2023-12-22
Last updated
2025-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma

Keywords

Lymphoma, T-cell Lymphoma, Relapse, Refractory, PI3K-δ,γ

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, parallel cohort, open-label, Phase 2 study of duvelisib, an oral dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide-3-kinase-delta, gamma (PI3K-δ,γ), in participants with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).

Detailed description

The study had 2 phases, a Dose Optimization Phase and an Expansion Phase. In the Dose Optimization Phase, participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study cohorts, as follows: * Cohort 1: Duvelisib per oral (PO) twice daily (BID) at a starting dose of 25 milligrams (mg), with potential escalation on a per-participant basis to 50 mg and then 75 mg, based on the participant's response to and tolerance of therapy, in 28-day cycles. * Cohort 2: Duvelisib 75 mg PO BID, administered in 28-day cycles. A total of 20 participants were to be enrolled in the Dose Optimization Phase, with 10 participants per cohort. Based on the safety and activity data obtained in the Dose Optimization Phase of the study, the Expansion Phase dose of duvelisib was to be determined. In the Expansion Phase, approximately 100-130 participants were to be enrolled and receive duvelisib dose in 28-day cycles as determined in Dose Optimization Phase.

Interventions

DRUGDuvelisib

Duvelisib PO 25 mg BID or 50 mg BID or 75 mg BID in 28-day cycles.

Sponsors

SecuraBio
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years of age 2. Diagnosis of one of the following histologic subtypes of PTCL, pathologically confirmed, as defined by the World Health Organization: 1. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified; 2. Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphomas; 3. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); or 4. Natural-killer/T-cell lymphoma 3. Received at least 2 cycles of one standard regimen for newly diagnosed advanced PTCL, and one of the following: 1. failed to achieve at least a PR after 2 or more cycles of standard therapy; 2. failed to achieve a CR after completion of standard therapy; and/or 3. persistent or progressive disease after an initial response 4. For participants with CD30+ ALCL, failed or are ineligible or intolerant to brentuximab vedotin 5. Measurable disease as defined by Lugano for PTCL, that is, at least 1 measurable disease lesion \> 1.5 centimeters in at least one dimension by conventional techniques (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography \[CT\], CT with contrast, magnetic imaging resonance)

Exclusion criteria

1. Primary leukemic PTCL subtypes (that is, T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma and aggressive NK-cell leukemia) or transformed mycosis fungoides 2. Received prior allogeneic transplant 3. Received prior treatment with a PI3K inhibitor 4. Known central nervous system involvement by PTCL 5. Ongoing treatment with chronic immunosuppressants (e.g., cyclosporine) or systemic steroids \> 20 mg of prednisone (or equivalent) once daily 6. Ongoing treatment for systemic bacterial, fungal, or viral infection at Screening 7. Known hypersensitivity to duvelisib and/or its excipients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria56 days (2 cycles; 28-day cycles)ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR + PR, as assessed by the investigator using the Lugano criteria, for participants receiving the optimal dose of duvelisib for at least one cycle of study therapy.
ORR as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using the Lugano Criteria56 days (2 cycles; 28-day cycles)ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR + PR, as assessed by the IRC using the Lugano criteria, for participants receiving the optimal dose of duvelisib for at least one cycle of study therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Control Rate (DCR) As Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano CriteriaUp to 8 weeksDCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR or with a best overall response of stable disease (SD) sustained for at least 8 weeks.
DOR as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano CriteriaUp to 70 monthsDOR was defined for participants with CR or PR as the time from the date of the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. Participants who withdrew from the study for any reason prior to PD and participants who had ongoing response at the time of the data cut were censored at the date of their last response assessment.
PFS as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano CriteriaUp to 70 monthsPFS was defined as the time from the date of first treatment to the date of the first radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano CriteriaUp to 70 monthsDOR was defined for participants with CR or PR as the time from the date of the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who withdraw from the study for any reason prior to PD and participants who had ongoing response at the time of the data cut were censored at the date of their last response assessment.
Overall Survival (OS)Up to 70 monthsOS was defined as the time from the date of first treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at last alive date.
Plasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Day 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 (4 hours postdose) (28-day cycles)Blood samples were taken for the analyses of duvelisib and IPI-656 in plasma at designated time points. Results are reported as nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL).
DCR as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano CriteriaUp to 8 weeksDCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR or with a best overall response of SD sustained for at least 8 weeks.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano CriteriaUp to 70 monthsPFS was defined as the time from the date of first treatment to the date of the first radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

Countries

Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Regardless of study phase, all participants underwent screening assessments up to 30 days before the first study drug dose.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1
Duvelisib PO BID at a starting dose of 25 mg, with potential escalation on a per-participant basis to 50 mg and then 75 mg, based on the participant's response to and tolerance of therapy, in 28-day cycles.
20
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2
Duvelisib 75 mg PO BID, administered in 28-day cycles.
13
Expansion Phase
Duvelisib PO BID at a starting dose of 75 mg for the first 2 cycles, followed by a mandatory reduction to 25 mg BID thereafter for those participants with CR, PR or SD, in 28-day cycles (dose determined in Optimization Phase).
123
Total156

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Dose Optimization PhaseClosure Of The Study By The Sponsor310
Dose Optimization PhaseDeath16110
Dose Optimization PhaseWithdrawal by Subject110
Expansion PhaseAdverse Event001
Expansion PhaseClosure Of The Study By The Sponsor0039
Expansion PhaseDeath0078
Expansion PhaseProgressive Disease001
Expansion PhaseWithdrawal by Subject004

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalExpansion PhaseDose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1
Age, Continuous63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.29
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.59
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.22
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.81
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0
62 participants49 participants5 participants8 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1
79 participants64 participants7 participants8 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2
14 participants10 participants1 participants3 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
3
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
4
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
5
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Missing
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants12 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
141 Participants111 Participants12 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
20 Participants18 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants9 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
120 Participants92 Participants12 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants56 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
90 Participants67 Participants9 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
16 / 2011 / 1378 / 123
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 2013 / 13121 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 209 / 1360 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

ORR as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using the Lugano Criteria

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR + PR, as assessed by the IRC using the Lugano criteria, for participants receiving the optimal dose of duvelisib for at least one cycle of study therapy.

Time frame: 56 days (2 cycles; 28-day cycles)

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT): all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified, efficacy analysis using IRC assessment reported for the Expansion Phase only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1ORR as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using the Lugano Criteria48.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR + PR, as assessed by the investigator using the Lugano criteria, for participants receiving the optimal dose of duvelisib for at least one cycle of study therapy.

Time frame: 56 days (2 cycles; 28-day cycles)

Population: Dose Optimization Efficacy Set: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug, completed at least one cycle of treatment, and had at least one scan to assess disease response after completion of one cycle of treatment. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified, efficacy analysis using investigator assessment reported for the Dose Optimization Phase only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria53.8 percentage of participants
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria53.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

DCR as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano Criteria

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR or with a best overall response of SD sustained for at least 8 weeks.

Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT): all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified, efficacy analysis using IRC assessment reported for the Expansion Phase only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1DCR as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano Criteria49.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR) As Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR or with a best overall response of stable disease (SD) sustained for at least 8 weeks.

Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

Population: Dose Optimization Efficacy Set: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug, completed at least one cycle of treatment, and had at least one scan to assess disease response after completion of one cycle of treatment. As pre-specified, efficacy analysis using investigator assessment reported for the Dose Optimization Phase only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Disease Control Rate (DCR) As Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria61.5 percentage of participants
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2Disease Control Rate (DCR) As Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria61.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

DOR as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano Criteria

DOR was defined for participants with CR or PR as the time from the date of the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. Participants who withdrew from the study for any reason prior to PD and participants who had ongoing response at the time of the data cut were censored at the date of their last response assessment.

Time frame: Up to 70 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT): all participants who receive at least one dose of study drug. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified, efficacy analysis using IRC assessment reported for the Expansion Phase only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1DOR as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano Criteria7.9 month
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria

DOR was defined for participants with CR or PR as the time from the date of the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who withdraw from the study for any reason prior to PD and participants who had ongoing response at the time of the data cut were censored at the date of their last response assessment.

Time frame: Up to 70 months

Population: Dose Optimization Efficacy Set: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug, completed at least one cycle of treatment, and had at least one scan to assess disease response after completion of one cycle of treatment. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified, efficacy analysis using investigator assessment reported for the Dose Optimization Phase only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria4.22 month
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria3.32 month
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of first treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at last alive date.

Time frame: Up to 70 months

Population: Dose Optimization Efficacy Set: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug, completed at least one cycle of treatment, and had at least one scan to assess disease response after completion of one cycle of treatment. Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT): all participants who receive at least one dose of study drug. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Overall Survival (OS)6.70 month
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2Overall Survival (OS)10.58 month
Expansion PhaseOverall Survival (OS)12.4 month
Secondary

PFS as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano Criteria

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first treatment to the date of the first radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Up to 70 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT): all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified, efficacy analysis using IRC assessment reported for the Expansion Phase only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1PFS as Assessed by the IRC Using the Lugano Criteria3.4 months
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)

Blood samples were taken for the analyses of duvelisib and IPI-656 in plasma at designated time points. Results are reported as nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL).

Time frame: Day 15 of Cycles 1 and 2 (4 hours postdose) (28-day cycles)

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure, and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Plasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Duvelisib: Cycle 1, Day 151238.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 787.53
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Plasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Duvelisib: Cycle 2, Day 151492.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1019.1
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Plasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Metabolite (IPI-156): Cycle 1, Day 151310.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1408.99
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Plasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Metabolite (IPI-156): Cycle 2, Day 15894.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 441.55
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2Plasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Metabolite (IPI-156): Cycle 1, Day 151580.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 772.13
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2Plasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Duvelisib: Cycle 1, Day 152070.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 889.39
Expansion PhasePlasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Duvelisib: Cycle 2, Day 152648.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1336.94
Expansion PhasePlasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Metabolite (IPI-156): Cycle 2, Day 152427.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1655.89
Expansion PhasePlasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Duvelisib: Cycle 1, Day 152873.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1709.15
Expansion PhasePlasma Concentration of IPI-145 (Duvelisib) and IPI-656 (Metabolite)Metabolite (IPI-156): Cycle 1, Day 152387.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1919.33
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first treatment to the date of the first radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Up to 70 months

Population: Dose Optimization Efficacy Set: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug, completed at least one cycle of treatment, and had at least one scan to assess disease response after completion of one cycle of treatment. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified, efficacy analysis using investigator assessment reported for the Dose Optimization Phase only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 1Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria3.55 month
Dose Optimization Phase: Cohort 2Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Using the Lugano Criteria3.55 month

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026