Skip to content

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients With Early Relapsing Recurrent Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

A Phase III, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy For Patients With Early Relapsing Recurrent (Inoperable Locally Advanced Or Metastatic) Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03371017
Acronym
IMpassion132
Enrollment
595
Registered
2017-12-13
Start date
2018-01-11
Completion date
2024-10-23
Last updated
2025-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with inoperable recurrent triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Interventions

DRUGAtezolizumab

Atezolizumab will be administered, 1200 mg by IV infusion with : gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, followed by carboplatin target area under the curve (AUC) 2 mg/ml/min, both administered by IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week treatment cycle or with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, twice daily orally on Days 1 to 14, followed by a 7-day rest period in each 3-week treatment cycle

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be administered, 1200 mg by IV infusion with : gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, followed by carboplatin target area under the curve (AUC) 2 mg/ml/min, both administered by IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week treatment cycle or with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, twice daily orally on Days 1 to 14, followed by a 7-day rest period in each 3-week treatment cycle

DRUGGemcitabine

Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, followed by carboplatin target area under the curve (AUC) 2 mg/ml/min, both administered by IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week treatment cycle

DRUGCapecitabine

Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, twice daily orally on Days 1 to 14, followed by a 7-day rest period in each 3-week treatment cycle

DRUGCarboplatin

Carboplatin target area under the curve (AUC) 2 mg/ml/min, both administered by IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week treatment cycle

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) that is either locally recurrent, inoperable and cannot be treated with curative intent or is metastatic * Documented disease progression occurring within 12 months from the last treatment with curative intent * Prior treatment (of early breast cancer) with an anthracycline and taxane * Have not received prior chemotherapy or targeted systemic therapy for their locally advanced inoperable or metastatic recurrence. Prior radiation therapy for recurrent disease is permitted * Measurable or non-measurable disease, as defined by RECIST 1.1 * Availability of a representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour block (preferred) or at least 17 unstained slides obtained from relapsed metastatic or locally advanced diseases may be submitted, if clinically feasible, with an associated pathology report, if available. If a fresh tumour sample is not clinically feasible, either the diagnosis sample, the primary surgical resection sample, or the most recent FFPE tumour biopsy sample should be used. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 * Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks * Adequate haematologic and end-organ function * Negative human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test ---Negative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) test at screening * Negative total hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) test at screening, or positive HBcAb test followed by a negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA test at screening * The HBV DNA test will be performed only for patients who have a negative HBsAg and a positive HBcAb test. * Negative hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody test at screening, or positive HCV antibody test followed by a negative HCV RNA test at screening. * Women of childbearing potential must agree to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use a contraceptive method with a failure rate of ≤1% per year during the treatment period and for at least 5 months after the last dose of atezolizumab or 6 months after the last dose of capecitabine, whichever is later. In addition, women must refrain from donating eggs during the same time period. * Men must agree to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive measures, and agree to refrain from donating sperm Inclusion criteria for patients enrolled after the recruitment of all-comers is complete: -PD-L1-positive tumour status (assessed centrally prior to randomisation), defined as PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells (IC) of 1% or greater.

Exclusion criteria

* Spinal cord compression not definitively treated with surgery and/or radiation, or previously diagnosed and treated spinal cord compression without evidence that disease has been clinically stable for \> 2 weeks prior to randomisation * Symptomatic, untreated, or actively progressing central nervous system (CNS) metastases. * Symptomatic or rapid visceral progression * No prior treatment with an anthracycline and taxane * History of leptomeningeal disease * Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring recurrent drainage procedures (once monthly or more frequently) (patients with indwelling catheters such as PleurX® are allowed) * Uncontrolled tumour-related pain * Uncontrolled or symptomatic hypercalcemia * Malignancies other than TNBC within 5 years prior to randomisation) * Significant cardiovascular disease, within 3 months prior to randomisation, unstable arrhythmias, or unstable angina * Presence of an abnormal ECG * Severe infection requiring oral or IV antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to randomisation, including but not limited to hospitalization for complications of infection, bacteraemia, or severe pneumonia. * Current treatment with anti-viral therapy for HBV. * Major surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to randomisation or anticipation of the need for a major surgical procedure during the course of the study other than for diagnosis * Treatment with investigational therapy within 28 days prior to randomisation * Pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during or within 5 months after the last dose of atezolizumab, or within 6 months after the last dose of capecitabine, whichever is later.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) in PD-L1-positive PopulationTime from randomization to death (Up to 68 months)OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants without a reported death event at the time of the analysis were censored on the date they were last known to be alive. If no post-baseline data were available, OS was censored at the date of randomization +1 day.
OS in Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) PopulationTime from randomization to death (Up to 68 months)OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants without a reported death event at the time of the analysis were censored on the date they were last known to be alive. If no post-baseline data were available, OS was censored at the date of randomization +1 day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ORR in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of mITT PopulationBaseline up to end of study (Up to 68 months)ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented unconfirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
Confirmed Objective Response Rate (C-ORR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationUp to 68 monthsC-ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented confirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
C-ORR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT PopulationUp to 68 monthsC-ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented confirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
DoR for Confirmed Responders (C-DoR) in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)C-DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
C-DoR in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)C-DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) According to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in PD-L1-positive PopulationUp to 68 monthsTTD in GHS/QoL, defined by a minimally important decrease of ≥10 points at 2 consecutive assessment time-points on the GHS/QoL scale (Items 29, 30) of EORTC QLQ-C30, which consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), GHS and QoL, & six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS (Question 29: GHS; How would you rate your overall health during the past week?) & QoL (Question 30: QoL; How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?) were assessed & were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor; 7=Excellent). Scores are linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better QoL.
TTD in GHS/QoL According to EORTC QLQ-C30 in mITT PopulationUp to 68 monthsTTD in GHS/QoL, defined by a minimally important decrease of ≥10 points at 2 consecutive assessment time-points on the GHS/QoL scale (Items 29, 30) of EORTC QLQ-C30, which consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), GHS and QoL, & six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS (Question 29: GHS; How would you rate your overall health during the past week?) & QoL (Question 30: QoL; How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?) were assessed & were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor; 7=Excellent). Scores are linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better QoL.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From treatment initiation up to 90 days after last dose (up to 71 months)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions that worsen during a study are also considered AEs.
Serum Concentration of AtezolizumabPre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4; Post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 3 and Treatment Discontinuation Visit (up to 69 months) (1 Cycle= 3 weeks)
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to AtezolizumabCycles 1 to 4 and Treatment Discontinuation visit (up to 69 months)Number of ADA-positive participants after drug administration was determined for participants exposed to atezolizumab. For determining post-baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result. The sum of participants who were ADA-positive at postbaseline visits of Cycles 1 to 4 and treatment discontinuation has been reported here.
Number of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline up to 68 months
12-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population12 months12-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 12 months after randomization. The 12-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
12-month Survival Rate in mITT Population12 months12-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 12 months after randomization. The 12-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
18-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population18 months18-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 18 months after randomization. The 18-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
18-month Survival Rate in mITT Population18 months18-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 18 months after randomization. The 18-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) in PD-L1-positive PopulationTime from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (Up to 68 months)PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 millimeters (mm). Data for participants not experiencing PD or death were censored at the last tumour assessment date. If no tumor assessment was performed after randomisation, data were censored at the date of randomisation +1 day.
PFS in mITT PopulationTime from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (Up to 68 months)PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Data for participants not experiencing PD or death were censored at the last tumour assessment date. If no tumor assessment was performed after randomisation, data were censored at the date of randomisation +1 day.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationBaseline up to end of study (Up to 68 months)ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented unconfirmed objective response (OR). OR was defined as either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
Duration of Objective Response (DoR) in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented unconfirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
DoR in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented unconfirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationUp to 68 monthsCBR was defined as the percentage of participants with either an unconfirmed CR or PR or stable disease (SD) that lasts at least 6 months as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
CBR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT PopulationUp to 68 monthsCBR was defined as the percentage of participants with either an unconfirmed CR or PR or SD that lasts at least 6 months as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFS in China PopulationTime from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (Up to 68 months)PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST 1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
ORR in China PopulationBaseline up to end of study (Up to 68 months)ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented unconfirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR.
DoR in China PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented unconfirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
CBR in China PopulationUp to 68 monthsCBR was defined as the percentage of participants with either an unconfirmed CR or PR or SD that lasts at least 6 months as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm.
C-ORR in China PopulationUp to 68 monthsC-ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented confirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR.
C-DoR in China PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)C-DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
TTD in GHS/QoL According to EORTC QLQ-C30 in China PopulationUp to 68 monthsTTD in GHS/QoL, defined by a minimally important decrease of ≥10 points at 2 consecutive assessment time-points on the GHS/QoL scale (Items 29, 30) of EORTC QLQ-C30, which consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), GHS and QoL, & six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS (Question 29: GHS; How would you rate your overall health during the past week?) & QoL (Question 30: QoL; How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?) were assessed & were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor; 7=Excellent). Scores are linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better QoL.
12-month Survival Rate in China Population12 months12-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 12 months after randomization.
OS in China PopulationTime from randomization to death (Up to 68 months)OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause.
18-month Survival Rate in China Population18 months18-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 18 months after randomization.

Countries

Argentina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Chile, China, Cuba, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 595 participants with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) took part in the study at 126 investigative sites in 28 countries from 11 January 2018 to 23 October 2024.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive atezolizumab with chemotherapy or placebo with chemotherapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo + Chemotherapy
Participants received atezolizumab matching placebo, by IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle along with either gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m\^2, followed by carboplatin target AUC 2 mg/ml/min, both administered by IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle or capecitabine, 1000 mg/m\^2, BID, orally on Days 1 to 14, followed by a 7-day rest period in each cycle (1 Cycle= 3 weeks). Treatment was continued until PD, unacceptable toxicity, death or participant or investigator decision to discontinue treatment.
298
Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 mg, by IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle along with either gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m\^2, followed by carboplatin target AUC 2 mg/ml/min, both administered by IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle or capecitabine, 1000 mg/m\^2, BID, orally on Days 1 to 14, followed by a 7-day rest period in each cycle (1 Cycle = 3 weeks). Treatment was continued until PD, unacceptable toxicity, death or participant or investigator decision to discontinue treatment.
297
Total595

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath228215
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1316
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation01
Overall StudyReason not Specified01
Overall StudyStudy Ended by Sponsor3738
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2025

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtezolizumab + ChemotherapyTotalPlacebo + Chemotherapy
Age, Continuous48.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
51 Participants110 Participants59 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
218 Participants440 Participants222 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
28 Participants45 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
69 Participants135 Participants66 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
28 Participants48 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
184 Participants383 Participants199 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
297 Participants595 Participants298 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
233 / 294226 / 293
other
Total, other adverse events
278 / 294276 / 293
serious
Total, serious adverse events
57 / 29469 / 293

Outcome results

Primary

OS in Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) Population

OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants without a reported death event at the time of the analysis were censored on the date they were last known to be alive. If no post-baseline data were available, OS was censored at the date of randomization +1 day.

Time frame: Time from randomization to death (Up to 68 months)

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyOS in Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) Population9.79 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyOS in Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) Population10.35 months
p-value: 0.613995% CI: [0.76, 1.18]Log Rank
Primary

Overall Survival (OS) in PD-L1-positive Population

OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants without a reported death event at the time of the analysis were censored on the date they were last known to be alive. If no post-baseline data were available, OS was censored at the date of randomization +1 day.

Time frame: Time from randomization to death (Up to 68 months)

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyOverall Survival (OS) in PD-L1-positive Population11.24 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyOverall Survival (OS) in PD-L1-positive Population12.09 months
p-value: 0.589195% CI: [0.73, 1.2]Log Rank
Secondary

12-month Survival Rate in mITT Population

12-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 12 months after randomization. The 12-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Chemotherapy12-month Survival Rate in mITT Population42.44 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy12-month Survival Rate in mITT Population46.20 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.47595% CI: [-6.55, 14.07]Z-test
Secondary

12-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population

12-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 12 months after randomization. The 12-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Chemotherapy12-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population47.58 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy12-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population50.26 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.626495% CI: [-8.14, 13.51]Z-test
Secondary

18-month Survival Rate in mITT Population

18-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 18 months after randomization. The 18-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Chemotherapy18-month Survival Rate in mITT Population25.68 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy18-month Survival Rate in mITT Population27.05 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.773895% CI: [-7.96, 10.69]Z-test
Secondary

18-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population

18-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 18 months after randomization. The 18-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Chemotherapy18-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population32.48 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy18-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population33.63 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.831595% CI: [-9.45, 11.75]Z-test
Secondary

CBR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with either an unconfirmed CR or PR or SD that lasts at least 6 months as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Response-evaluable population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + ChemotherapyCBR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population36.3 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyCBR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population35.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

C-DoR in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population

C-DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: Time from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. C-DOR-evaluable population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline and a confirmed OR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyC-DoR in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population6.51 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyC-DoR in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population7.43 months
p-value: 0.985395% CI: [0.61, 1.61]Log Rank
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with either an unconfirmed CR or PR or stable disease (SD) that lasts at least 6 months as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating immune cells IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Response-evaluable population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + ChemotherapyClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population34.6 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population42.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Confirmed Objective Response Rate (C-ORR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population

C-ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented confirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Response-evaluable population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + ChemotherapyConfirmed Objective Response Rate (C-ORR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population19.5 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyConfirmed Objective Response Rate (C-ORR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population31.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.017295% CI: [1.47, 21.87]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

C-ORR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population

C-ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented confirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Response-evaluable population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + ChemotherapyC-ORR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population23.2 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyC-ORR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population23.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Stratified Analysisp-value: 0.867995% CI: [-9.41, 9.77]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

DoR for Confirmed Responders (C-DoR) in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population

C-DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: Time from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)

Population: PD-L1 population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. C-DOR-evaluable population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline and a confirmed OR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyDoR for Confirmed Responders (C-DoR) in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population5.78 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyDoR for Confirmed Responders (C-DoR) in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population7.92 months
p-value: 0.284695% CI: [0.46, 1.26]Log Rank
Secondary

DoR in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population

DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented unconfirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: Time from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. DOR-evaluable population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline and an OR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyDoR in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population5.22 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyDoR in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT Population5.70 months
p-value: 0.822595% CI: [0.63, 1.43]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Objective Response (DoR) in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population

DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented unconfirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: Time from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. DOR-evaluable population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline and an OR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyDuration of Objective Response (DoR) in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population4.14 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyDuration of Objective Response (DoR) in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive Population6.60 months
p-value: 0.135995% CI: [0.48, 1.11]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions that worsen during a study are also considered AEs.

Time frame: From treatment initiation up to 90 days after last dose (up to 71 months)

Population: Safety-evaluable population included participants who received any amount of any study drug (atezolizumab/placebo or chemotherapy).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)283 Participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)281 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab

Number of ADA-positive participants after drug administration was determined for participants exposed to atezolizumab. For determining post-baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result. The sum of participants who were ADA-positive at postbaseline visits of Cycles 1 to 4 and treatment discontinuation has been reported here.

Time frame: Cycles 1 to 4 and Treatment Discontinuation visit (up to 69 months)

Population: Safety-evaluable population included participants who received any amount of any study drug (atezolizumab/placebo or chemotherapy). Overall number analyzed included participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline Assessment

Time frame: Baseline up to 68 months

Population: FAS population included all participants randomized in the study, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline IC0- Post-baseline IC 03 Participants
Placebo + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline IC1/2/3- Post-baseline IC 00 Participants
Placebo + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline IC0- Post-baseline IC1/2/30 Participants
Placebo + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline IC1/2/3- Post-baseline IC1/2/36 Participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline IC1/2/3- Post-baseline IC1/2/32 Participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline IC0- Post-baseline IC 00 Participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline IC0- Post-baseline IC1/2/30 Participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With PD-L1 Protein Expression in Screening Tumour Tissue and Post-baseline AssessmentBaseline IC1/2/3- Post-baseline IC 00 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of PD-L1-positive Population

ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented unconfirmed objective response (OR). OR was defined as either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Up to 68 months)

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Response-evaluable Population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of PD-L1-positive Population28.3 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of PD-L1-positive Population39.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.033795% CI: [0.24, 22.37]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

ORR in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of mITT Population

ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented unconfirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Up to 68 months)

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1 (SP142)-positive and PD-L1 (SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Response-evaluable Population included participants randomized in the study with measurable disease at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + ChemotherapyORR in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of mITT Population32.1 percentage of participants
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyORR in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of mITT Population31.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.975595% CI: [-11.63, 9.34]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PFS in mITT Population

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Data for participants not experiencing PD or death were censored at the last tumour assessment date. If no tumor assessment was performed after randomisation, data were censored at the date of randomisation +1 day.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (Up to 68 months)

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyPFS in mITT Population3.58 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyPFS in mITT Population3.71 months
p-value: 0.731795% CI: [0.78, 1.19]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) in PD-L1-positive Population

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 millimeters (mm). Data for participants not experiencing PD or death were censored at the last tumour assessment date. If no tumor assessment was performed after randomisation, data were censored at the date of randomisation +1 day.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (Up to 68 months)

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyProgression-free Survival (PFS) in PD-L1-positive Population3.58 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyProgression-free Survival (PFS) in PD-L1-positive Population4.21 months
p-value: 0.138795% CI: [0.67, 1.06]Log Rank
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Atezolizumab

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4; Post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 3 and Treatment Discontinuation Visit (up to 69 months) (1 Cycle= 3 weeks)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK)-evaluable population included participants who received any dose of study medication and who had at least one evaluable post-baseline PK sample. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + ChemotherapySerum Concentration of AtezolizumabCycle 1 Day 1 Post-dose442 micrograms/millilitre (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.7
Placebo + ChemotherapySerum Concentration of AtezolizumabCycle 1 Day 1 PredoseNA micrograms/millilitre (µg/mL)
Placebo + ChemotherapySerum Concentration of AtezolizumabCycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose87.2 micrograms/millilitre (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 72.7
Placebo + ChemotherapySerum Concentration of AtezolizumabCycle 3 Day 1 Predose140 micrograms/millilitre (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.9
Placebo + ChemotherapySerum Concentration of AtezolizumabCycle 3 Day 1 Postdose517 micrograms/millilitre (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.7
Placebo + ChemotherapySerum Concentration of AtezolizumabCycle 4 Day 1 Predose157 micrograms/millilitre (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 104.9
Placebo + ChemotherapySerum Concentration of AtezolizumabTreatment Discontinuation120 micrograms/millilitre (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 189.7
Secondary

Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) According to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in PD-L1-positive Population

TTD in GHS/QoL, defined by a minimally important decrease of ≥10 points at 2 consecutive assessment time-points on the GHS/QoL scale (Items 29, 30) of EORTC QLQ-C30, which consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), GHS and QoL, & six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS (Question 29: GHS; How would you rate your overall health during the past week?) & QoL (Question 30: QoL; How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?) were assessed & were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor; 7=Excellent). Scores are linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better QoL.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: PD-L1 positive population included all participants randomized in the study whose PD-L1 status was tumor-infiltrating IC of 1% or greater (IC1/2/3) at the time of randomization, grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyTime to Confirmed Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) According to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in PD-L1-positive Population6.77 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyTime to Confirmed Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) According to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in PD-L1-positive Population9.43 months
Comparison: Stratified Analysisp-value: 0.411795% CI: [0.63, 1.21]Log Rank
Secondary

TTD in GHS/QoL According to EORTC QLQ-C30 in mITT Population

TTD in GHS/QoL, defined by a minimally important decrease of ≥10 points at 2 consecutive assessment time-points on the GHS/QoL scale (Items 29, 30) of EORTC QLQ-C30, which consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), GHS and QoL, & six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS (Question 29: GHS; How would you rate your overall health during the past week?) & QoL (Question 30: QoL; How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?) were assessed & were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor; 7=Excellent). Scores are linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better QoL.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: mITT population included all participants randomized under the protocol versions prior to version 4.0 (referred to as all-comers, i.e., PD-L1(SP142)-positive and PD-L1(SP142)-negative participants), grouped according to their assigned treatment arm, whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + ChemotherapyTTD in GHS/QoL According to EORTC QLQ-C30 in mITT Population7.66 months
Atezolizumab + ChemotherapyTTD in GHS/QoL According to EORTC QLQ-C30 in mITT Population8.90 months
Comparison: Stratified Analysisp-value: 0.721595% CI: [0.68, 1.3]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

12-month Survival Rate in China Population

12-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 12 months after randomization.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for global population did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

18-month Survival Rate in China Population

18-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 18 months after randomization.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for the global population did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

CBR in China Population

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with either an unconfirmed CR or PR or SD that lasts at least 6 months as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for the global population were did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

C-DoR in China Population

C-DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: Time from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for the global population did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

C-ORR in China Population

C-ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented confirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for the global population were did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

DoR in China Population

DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented unconfirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: Time from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for the global population were did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

ORR in China Population

ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented unconfirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Up to 68 months)

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for the global population were did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

OS in China Population

OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause.

Time frame: Time from randomization to death (Up to 68 months)

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and the estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for global population did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

PFS in China Population

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST 1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (Up to 68 months)

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for the global population did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Other Pre-specified

TTD in GHS/QoL According to EORTC QLQ-C30 in China Population

TTD in GHS/QoL, defined by a minimally important decrease of ≥10 points at 2 consecutive assessment time-points on the GHS/QoL scale (Items 29, 30) of EORTC QLQ-C30, which consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), GHS and QoL, & six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS (Question 29: GHS; How would you rate your overall health during the past week?) & QoL (Question 30: QoL; How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?) were assessed & were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor; 7=Excellent). Scores are linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better QoL.

Time frame: Up to 68 months

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP, analysis for China population was to be conducted based on data maturity and estimated treatment effect from the global population. As the results for the global population did not meet pre-specified criteria, a separate analysis for China subpopulation was not conducted.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026