Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab Compared to Placebo and an Active Comparator in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03370133
Acronym
BE VIVID
Enrollment
567
Registered
2017-12-12
Start date
2017-12-06
Completion date
2019-12-13
Last updated
2026-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

Bimekizumab, PSO, Psoriasis

Brief summary

This is a study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo and an active comparator in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO).

Interventions

DRUGBimekizumab

Bimekizumab will be provided at pre-specified time intervals.

DRUGUstekinumab

Ustekinumab will be provided as dose 1 for subjects weighing \<=100 kg and as dose 2 for subjects weighing \>100 kg at pre-specified time intervals.

OTHERPlacebo

Subjects will receive Placebo at pre-specified time points.

Sponsors

UCB Biopharma SRL
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must be at least 18 years of age * Chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO) for at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit * Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) \>=12 and body surface area (BSA) affected by PSO \>=10% and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score \>=3 on a 5-point scale * Subject is a candidate for systemic PSO therapy and/or phototherapy * Female subject of child bearing potential must be willing to use highly effective method of contraception

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has an active infection (except common cold), a recent serious infection, or a history of opportunistic or recurrent chronic infections * Subject has concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection * Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection * Subject has any other condition, including medical or psychiatric, which, in the Investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study * Presence of active suicidal ideation or positive suicide behavior * Presence of moderately severe major depression or severe major depression * Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16Week 16The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 16Week 16The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] or almost clear \[1\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16Week 16The PASI100 response assessments are based on a 100% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Percentage of Participants With an IGA 0 Response at Week 16Week 16The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4Week 4The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 16Week 16As Patient-Reported-Outcome (PRO) measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD pain item was assessed daily on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). PSD score for pain at a given visit was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in pain score higher than the prespecified 1.98 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with PSD pain response.
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 16Week 16A PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD itch item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no itch) to 10 (very severe itch). PSD score for itch was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in itch score higher than the prespecified 2.39 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD itch response.
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 16Week 16As PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD scaling item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no scaling) to 10 (very severe scaling). PSD score for scaling was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in scaling score higher than the prespecified 2.86 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD scaling response.
Percentage of Participants With a Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) >=2 at BaselineWeek 16Only participants with scalp involvement at Baseline completed the scalp IGA. Participants with scalp involvement at Baseline were defined as those with a scalp IGA score \>0 at Baseline. Scalp lesions were assessed in terms of clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness using a 5-point scale (0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4= Severe). Scalp IGA 0/1 response at Week 16 was defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1) with at least a 2-category improvement from Baseline to Week 16.
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 12Week 12The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 52Week 52The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 12Week 12The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] or almost clear \[1\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 12.
Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 52Week 52The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] or almost clear \[1\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 52.
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the Adverse Event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment PeriodFrom Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the Adverse Event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment PeriodFrom Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment PeriodFrom Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORUCB Cares

001 844 599 2273 (UCB)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study started to enroll participants in December 2017 and concluded in December 2019.

Pre-assignment details

The study included a 2-5 week Screening Period, a 16-week Initial Period and a 36-week Maintenance Period. After the Maintenance Period participants either enrolled in an open-label study or had a SFU Visit 20 weeks after their final dose (including those withdrawn from IMP). Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set and Maintenance Set.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo up to Week 16 and bimekizumab starting at Week 16 through Week 52.
83
Bimekizumab (BKZ) 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4W
Participants received bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W for 52 weeks.
321
Ustekinumab (Uste)
Participants received ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (depending on participants weight) for 52 weeks. Placebo was administered at pre-specified time points to maintain the blinding.
163
Total Title567
Total1,134

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBimekizumab (BKZ) 320 Milligrams (mg) Q4WUstekinumab (Uste)Total Title
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants34 Participants18 Participants62 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
73 Participants285 Participants144 Participants502 Participants
Age, Continuous49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
46.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
20 Participants71 Participants36 Participants127 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 Participants9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other/mixed
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
63 Participants237 Participants120 Participants420 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants92 Participants46 Participants161 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants229 Participants117 Participants406 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 831 / 3211 / 1632 / 3951 / 163
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 8387 / 32137 / 163192 / 39573 / 163
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 835 / 3215 / 16324 / 39513 / 163

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 16

The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] or almost clear \[1\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 164.8 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 1684.1 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 1653.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel) test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [36.701, 384.307]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel) test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.096, 7.47]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16

The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 164.8 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 1685.0 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 1649.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel) test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [34.02, 293.175]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel) test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.874, 9.466]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)

Population: The Safety Set (SS) consisted of all study participants that received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period7.97 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period5.06 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Ustekinumab (RS)Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period10.14 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Secondary

Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period

The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)

Population: The Maintenance Set (MS) consisted of all study participants who had received at least 1 dose of active IMP (bimekizumab or ustekinumab) in the Maintenance Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period9.88 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period6.19 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Ustekinumab (RS)Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period7.46 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Secondary

Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)

Population: The Safety Set (SS) consisted of all study participants that received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period24.39 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period6.08 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Ustekinumab (RS)Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period5.99 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Secondary

Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period

The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)

Population: The Maintenance Set (MS) consisted of all study participants who had received at least 1 dose of active IMP (bimekizumab or ustekinumab) in the Maintenance Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period5.91 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period5.72 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Ustekinumab (RS)Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period3.71 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period

The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the Adverse Event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame: From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period, including the Safety Follow-Up visit for those withdrawn from IMP (up to 36 weeks)

Population: The Safety Set (SS) consisted of all study participants that received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period238.41 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period287.26 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Ustekinumab (RS)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period247.62 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period

The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provided an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the Adverse Event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.

Time frame: From Week 16 to Safety Follow-Up (up to 52 weeks duration)

Population: The Maintenance Set (MS) consisted of all study participants who had received at least 1 dose of active IMP (bimekizumab or ustekinumab) in the Maintenance Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period149.35 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period127.84 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Ustekinumab (RS)Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Subject Exposure to Study Treatment During the Maintenance Treatment Period111.24 no. of new events per 100 subject-years
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an IGA 0 Response at Week 16

The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 16.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With an IGA 0 Response at Week 160 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With an IGA 0 Response at Week 1658.6 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With an IGA 0 Response at Week 1622.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables. Logit method was used where CMH test not possible due to very low response.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.02, 71.925]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 12

The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] or almost clear \[1\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 12.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 124.8 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 1281.9 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 1252.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.85, 6.73]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 52

The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as clear \[0\] or almost clear \[1\] with at least a two-category improvement from Baseline at Week 52.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants. Placebo was only provided up to Week 16 and was not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 5278.2 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With an IGA (Clear or Almost Clear With at Least a 2-category Improvement From Baseline) Response at Week 5260.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.573, 3.699]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16

The PASI100 response assessments are based on a 100% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 160 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 1658.6 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 1620.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables. Logit method was used where CMH test not possible due to very low response.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.063, 72.253]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4

The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 42.4 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 476.9 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 415.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables. Logit method was used where CMH test not possible due to very low response.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [29.394, 514.862]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10.998, 30.123]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 12

The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 122.4 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 1285.0 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 1243.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [5.107, 12.679]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 52

The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants. Placebo was only provided up to Week 16 and was not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 5281.9 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 5255.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.442, 5.899]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 16

A PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD itch item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no itch) to 10 (very severe itch). PSD score for itch was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in itch score higher than the prespecified 2.39 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD itch response.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants. Number of participants analyzed reflect those with a Baseline score at or above the 2.39 response threshold.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 1613.1 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 1676.6 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 1665.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables. Logit method was used where CMH test not possible due to very low response.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.795, 50.674]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 16

As Patient-Reported-Outcome (PRO) measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD pain item was assessed daily on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). PSD score for pain at a given visit was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in pain score higher than the prespecified 1.98 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with PSD pain response.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants. Number of participants analyzed reflect those with a Baseline score at or above the 1.98 response threshold.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 1616.7 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 1677.3 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 1668.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables. Logit method was used where CMH test not possible due to very low response.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.356, 35.931]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 16

As PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD scaling item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no scaling) to 10 (very severe scaling). PSD score for scaling was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in scaling score higher than the prespecified 2.86 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD scaling response.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants. Number of participants analyzed reflect those with a Baseline score at or above the 2.86 response threshold.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 1612.7 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 1678.5 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 1659.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables. Logit method was used where CMH test not possible due to very low response.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10.201, 52.077]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) >=2 at Baseline

Only participants with scalp involvement at Baseline completed the scalp IGA. Participants with scalp involvement at Baseline were defined as those with a scalp IGA score \>0 at Baseline. Scalp lesions were assessed in terms of clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness using a 5-point scale (0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4= Severe). Scalp IGA 0/1 response at Week 16 was defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1) with at least a 2-category improvement from Baseline to Week 16.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The Randomized Set (RS) consisted of all randomized study participants. Number of participants analyzed reflect those with a Baseline score of at least 2.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) >=2 at Baseline15.3 percentage of participants
Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) >=2 at Baseline84.2 percentage of participants
Ustekinumab (RS)Percentage of Participants With a Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) >=2 at Baseline70.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Odds ratio was calculated using stratified CMH test with region and prior biologic exposure as stratification variables. Logit method was used where CMH test not possible due to very low response.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [16.92, 83.987]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026