Skip to content

A Proof-of-Concept Study of Danicopan for 6 Months of Treatment in Participants With C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G)

A Phase 2, Proof-of-Concept, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study of ACH-0144471 Treatment for 6 Months in Patients With C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G), With an Open-label Extension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03369236
Enrollment
13
Registered
2017-12-11
Start date
2018-06-12
Completion date
2020-12-18
Last updated
2022-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

C3 Glomerulonephritis, C3 Glomerulopathy, Dense Deposit Disease

Keywords

factor D, fD, Alternative pathway, Complement mediated disease, Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis, Primary MPGN, MPGN, Mesangiocapillary Glomerulonephritis, Idiopathic MPGN, DDD, C3GN

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this proof-of-concept clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the study drug, ACH-0144471 (also known as danicopan and ALXN2040), in participants with C3G who also had significant proteinuria attributable to C3G.

Interventions

DRUGDanicopan

Danicopan was administered as an oral tablet.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo was administered as an oral tablet.

Sponsors

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Investigator and participant blinded; Sponsor open. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either danicopan or placebo for a period of 6 months, followed by an open-label extension.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Had biopsy-confirmed primary C3G * Had clinical evidence of ongoing disease based on significant proteinuria, attributable to C3G disease in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (PI), and present prior to study entry and confirmed during Screening * Was willing to comply with vaccination requirements. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Had a history or presence of any clinically relevant co-morbidities that would make the participant inappropriate for the study * Had ever received danicopan * Had more than 50% fibrosis or more than 50% of glomeruli with cellular crescents on the pre-treatment renal biopsy * Had an estimated glomerular filtration rate \<30 milliliters/minute/1.73 meters squared at the time of screening or at any time over the preceding 4 weeks * Was a renal transplant recipient or receiving renal replacement therapy * Had a history of a major organ transplant or hematopoietic stem cell/marrow transplant * Had evidence of monoclonal gammopathy of unclear significance, infections, malignancy, autoimmune diseases, or other conditions to which C3G is secondary * Had other renal diseases that would interfere with interpretation of the study * Had been diagnosed with or showed evidence of hepatobiliary cholestasis * Females who were pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant during the study or within 90 days of study drug administration * Had a history of febrile illness, a body temperature \>38°Celsius, or other evidence of a clinically significant active infection, within 14 days prior to study drug administration * Had evidence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B infection, or active hepatitis C infection at Screening * Had laboratory abnormalities at screening that, in the opinion of the PI, would make the participant inappropriate for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28Baseline, Week 28The composite biopsy score was based on a score incorporating changes in the activity index, glomerular C3c staining, and glomerular macrophage infiltration at the end of 6 months of treatment. The composite renal biopsy index scoring system ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28Week 28Proteinuria reduction was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline based on 24-hour urine protein (mg/day).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months6 monthsSlope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values from baseline until the end of the 6-month blinded treatment period, with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.
Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment12 monthsSlope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values during the open-label extension period with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.
Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28Baseline, Week 28Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.
Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28Baseline, Week 28Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.
Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52Baseline, Week 52Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.
Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28Baseline, Week 28Change from baseline in eGFR at Week 28 is presented.
Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28Baseline, Week 28Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

To enroll in the study, participants were required to have a biopsy confirmed diagnosis of C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G), with initial diagnosis made at least 3 months prior to dosing and significant proteinuria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Danicopan was administered at a starting dose of 100 mg 3 times daily (TID) for the first 2 weeks, then dosage was to be increased to 200 mg TID for the remainder of the 6-month treatment period.
6
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Placebo was administered TID during the 6-month treatment period.
7
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-blind Treatment PeriodAccidental unblinding01
Open-label Extension PeriodAdverse Event01
Open-label Extension PeriodLack of Efficacy21
Open-label Extension PeriodSponsor decision to close study34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Total
Age, Continuous25.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.54
24.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.85
25.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.63
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 70 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 65 / 78 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 71 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28

The composite biopsy score was based on a score incorporating changes in the activity index, glomerular C3c staining, and glomerular macrophage infiltration at the end of 6 months of treatment. The composite renal biopsy index scoring system ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28Baseline11.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.23
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28Week 289.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.87
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28Change from Baseline-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28Baseline9.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28Week 2810.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28Change from Baseline1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Primary

Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28

Proteinuria reduction was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline based on 24-hour urine protein (mg/day).

Time frame: Week 28

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 280 participants
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 281 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28

Change from baseline in eGFR at Week 28 is presented.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28Baseline79.890 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 44.4571
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28Week 2867.543 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 47.8062
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28Change from Baseline-12.347 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 10.8063
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28Baseline68.381 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 36.7249
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28Week 2850.874 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 15.0517
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28Change from Baseline-8.700 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 16.099
Secondary

Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28

Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28Baseline6137.67 mg/dayStandard Deviation 2904.359
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28Week 285301.75 mg/dayStandard Deviation 2984.445
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28Change from Baseline302.00 mg/dayStandard Deviation 764.211
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28Baseline4274.47 mg/dayStandard Deviation 2992.819
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28Week 285186.80 mg/dayStandard Deviation 4069.279
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28Change from Baseline182.20 mg/dayStandard Deviation 994.558
Secondary

Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28

Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 280 participants
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 280 participants
Secondary

Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52

Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 520 participants
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 520 participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28

Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 2812.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.11
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28-10.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.35
Secondary

Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment

Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values during the open-label extension period with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment-1.02556 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per monthStandard Deviation 1.389128
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment-1.84935 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per monthStandard Deviation 3.50681
TotalSlope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment-1.39169 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per monthStandard Deviation 2.401039
Secondary

Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months

Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values from baseline until the end of the 6-month blinded treatment period, with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months-2.26840 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per monthStandard Deviation 1.790814
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months-1.45421 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per monthStandard Deviation 2.228395

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026