C3 Glomerulonephritis, C3 Glomerulopathy, Dense Deposit Disease
Conditions
Keywords
factor D, fD, Alternative pathway, Complement mediated disease, Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis, Primary MPGN, MPGN, Mesangiocapillary Glomerulonephritis, Idiopathic MPGN, DDD, C3GN
Brief summary
The primary purpose of this proof-of-concept clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the study drug, ACH-0144471 (also known as danicopan and ALXN2040), in participants with C3G who also had significant proteinuria attributable to C3G.
Interventions
Danicopan was administered as an oral tablet.
Matching placebo was administered as an oral tablet.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Investigator and participant blinded; Sponsor open. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either danicopan or placebo for a period of 6 months, followed by an open-label extension.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Had biopsy-confirmed primary C3G * Had clinical evidence of ongoing disease based on significant proteinuria, attributable to C3G disease in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (PI), and present prior to study entry and confirmed during Screening * Was willing to comply with vaccination requirements. Key
Exclusion criteria
* Had a history or presence of any clinically relevant co-morbidities that would make the participant inappropriate for the study * Had ever received danicopan * Had more than 50% fibrosis or more than 50% of glomeruli with cellular crescents on the pre-treatment renal biopsy * Had an estimated glomerular filtration rate \<30 milliliters/minute/1.73 meters squared at the time of screening or at any time over the preceding 4 weeks * Was a renal transplant recipient or receiving renal replacement therapy * Had a history of a major organ transplant or hematopoietic stem cell/marrow transplant * Had evidence of monoclonal gammopathy of unclear significance, infections, malignancy, autoimmune diseases, or other conditions to which C3G is secondary * Had other renal diseases that would interfere with interpretation of the study * Had been diagnosed with or showed evidence of hepatobiliary cholestasis * Females who were pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant during the study or within 90 days of study drug administration * Had a history of febrile illness, a body temperature \>38°Celsius, or other evidence of a clinically significant active infection, within 14 days prior to study drug administration * Had evidence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B infection, or active hepatitis C infection at Screening * Had laboratory abnormalities at screening that, in the opinion of the PI, would make the participant inappropriate for the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28 | Baseline, Week 28 | The composite biopsy score was based on a score incorporating changes in the activity index, glomerular C3c staining, and glomerular macrophage infiltration at the end of 6 months of treatment. The composite renal biopsy index scoring system ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. |
| Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Week 28 | Proteinuria reduction was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline based on 24-hour urine protein (mg/day). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months | 6 months | Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values from baseline until the end of the 6-month blinded treatment period, with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable. |
| Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment | 12 months | Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values during the open-label extension period with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable. |
| Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Baseline, Week 28 | Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28. |
| Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28 | Baseline, Week 28 | Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR. |
| Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR. |
| Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28 | Baseline, Week 28 | Change from baseline in eGFR at Week 28 is presented. |
| Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Baseline, Week 28 | Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28. |
Countries
United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
To enroll in the study, participants were required to have a biopsy confirmed diagnosis of C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G), with initial diagnosis made at least 3 months prior to dosing and significant proteinuria.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) Danicopan was administered at a starting dose of 100 mg 3 times daily (TID) for the first 2 weeks, then dosage was to be increased to 200 mg TID for the remainder of the 6-month treatment period. | 6 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) Placebo was administered TID during the 6-month treatment period. | 7 |
| Total | 13 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double-blind Treatment Period | Accidental unblinding | 0 | 1 |
| Open-label Extension Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 |
| Open-label Extension Period | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 1 |
| Open-label Extension Period | Sponsor decision to close study | 3 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 25.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.54 | 24.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.85 | 25.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.63 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 6 participants | 6 participants | 12 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 6 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 12 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 5 / 6 | 5 / 7 | 8 / 12 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 6 | 0 / 7 | 1 / 12 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28
The composite biopsy score was based on a score incorporating changes in the activity index, glomerular C3c staining, and glomerular macrophage infiltration at the end of 6 months of treatment. The composite renal biopsy index scoring system ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28 | Baseline | 11.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.23 |
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28 | Week 28 | 9.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.87 |
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28 | Change from Baseline | -2.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.87 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28 | Baseline | 9.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28 | Week 28 | 10.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.39 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28 | Change from Baseline | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.88 |
Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28
Proteinuria reduction was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline based on 24-hour urine protein (mg/day).
Time frame: Week 28
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28 | 0 participants |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28 | 1 participants |
Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28
Change from baseline in eGFR at Week 28 is presented.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28 | Baseline | 79.890 mL/min/1.73 m^2 | Standard Deviation 44.4571 |
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28 | Week 28 | 67.543 mL/min/1.73 m^2 | Standard Deviation 47.8062 |
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28 | Change from Baseline | -12.347 mL/min/1.73 m^2 | Standard Deviation 10.8063 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28 | Baseline | 68.381 mL/min/1.73 m^2 | Standard Deviation 36.7249 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28 | Week 28 | 50.874 mL/min/1.73 m^2 | Standard Deviation 15.0517 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28 | Change from Baseline | -8.700 mL/min/1.73 m^2 | Standard Deviation 16.099 |
Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28
Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Baseline | 6137.67 mg/day | Standard Deviation 2904.359 |
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Week 28 | 5301.75 mg/day | Standard Deviation 2984.445 |
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Change from Baseline | 302.00 mg/day | Standard Deviation 764.211 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Baseline | 4274.47 mg/day | Standard Deviation 2992.819 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Week 28 | 5186.80 mg/day | Standard Deviation 4069.279 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | Change from Baseline | 182.20 mg/day | Standard Deviation 994.558 |
Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28
Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28 | 0 participants |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28 | 0 participants |
Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52
Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52 | 0 participants |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52 | 0 participants |
Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28
Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | 12.5 percent change | Standard Deviation 31.11 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28 | -10.4 percent change | Standard Deviation 31.35 |
Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment
Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values during the open-label extension period with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment | -1.02556 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per month | Standard Deviation 1.389128 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment | -1.84935 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per month | Standard Deviation 3.50681 |
| Total | Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment | -1.39169 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per month | Standard Deviation 2.401039 |
Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months
Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values from baseline until the end of the 6-month blinded treatment period, with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had analyzable data at the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months | -2.26840 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per month | Standard Deviation 1.790814 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period) | Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months | -1.45421 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per month | Standard Deviation 2.228395 |