Skip to content

The Benefit of Structured Triage of Patients in the Primary Health Care Seeking Care for Low Back Pain

The Benefit of Structured Triage of Patients in the Primary Health Care Seeking Care for Low Back Pain

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03368521
Enrollment
150
Registered
2017-12-11
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2017-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate if a low back pain screening tool is helpful for the caregivers to direct the rehabilitation in a more efficient way, at an earlier stage. Primary Health care centers in the municipality of Halmstad, Sweden will be enrolled to participate in the study as either Control or intervention. The primary Health care centers who are enrolled taking part in the intervention, will use the provided screening tool when taking care of patients seeking care for low back pain. Scorings from the screening tool will label the patients as one of Three pre-defined risk levels. The caregiver will then use the provided risk level when deciding how to proceed the rehabilitation. Based on the risk level identified, the patient is directed to one of three levels of treatments - including simple advice; physiotherapy; or multimodal rehabilitation. The screening tool is used as a complement to the examination, allowing the physiotherapist /GP to decide how to proceed with rehabilitation using the back screening tool, together with Clinical examinations. The Control Group consists of patients recruited when seeking care for back pain at a Primary Health Care service who has been randomly selected as Control. The care givers at the Control primary Health care will conduct as usual, not using the back pain screening tool in their Clinical examinations.

Interventions

OTHERBack pain screening test

The care giver use the screening tool in order to score the back patient to three levels of risk. For each level of risk, one suggested type of care is provided; 1) simple advise; 2) physiotherapy; 3) multimodal rehabilitation. highest risk level includes multimodal intervention.

Sponsors

FoU Center Spenshult
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Seeking care for low back pain at any of the included primary Health care.

Exclusion criteria

* Red flags

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of physiotherapy treatments4 months after inclusionNumber of treatments given by physiotherapist

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
back pain questionnaire - The Keele STarT Back Screening Tool4 months after inclusionThe Keele STarT Back Screening Tool, is a prognostic tool helping clinicians identify risk factors for persistent back pain. 9 questions. Total score range from 0 to 9 (best- to worse)
back pain questionnaire - Pain distribution4 months after inclusionPain distribution (numbers of marked regions and location) will be measured by a pain mannequin divided into 18 body regions.The patients mark each region with pain lasting more than three months during the past 12 months. The total number of regions giving a total score 0-18 (few to several regions, best- to worse).
back pain questionnaire - The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire4 months after inclusionThe Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire assess self-rated physical disability Total score range from 0-24 (best to worse disability)
work ability - Work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (WPAI)4 months after inclusionWork productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (WPAI) with 6 questions assessing the impact of the disease on work and other daily activities during the previous 7 days (absenteeism, presenteeism, impaired activities outside work, and overall work impairment). Each component is expressed as percentage of impairment due to the disease (0-100%) where a higher percentage indicates a greater reduction.
work ability - The work ability index (WAI)4 months after inclusionThe work ability index (WAI) single-item question concerned the item current work ability compared with the lifetime best, with a possible score of 0 (completely unable to work) to 10 (work ability at its best)

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactEmma Haglund, PhD
emma.haglund@spenshult.se0046 35 220202
Backup ContactMaria Andersson, PhD
maria.andersson@spenshult.se0046-35-220202

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026