Skip to content

Driving Pressure in Trauma

Driving Pressure in Trauma. Morbi-mortality and Pulmonary Mechanics in Relation to Transpulmonary Driving Pressures in Patients With Chest Trauma. A Prospective Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03367442
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-12-08
Start date
2018-11-22
Completion date
2022-09-15
Last updated
2022-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation, Sever Chest Trauma

Keywords

Thoracic trauma, mechanical ventilation, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Esophageal pressure, Pleural pressure

Brief summary

Traumatic chest injuries are responsible for significant morbidity and the cause of trauma-related death in 20%-25% of cases. Thoracic trauma can include multiple injuries, mainly osseous (ribs, sternal fractures, flail chest), pulmonary contusions or lacerations, pneumothoraces and pleural effusions, and sometimes involve wounds to the heart and vessels (aortic dissection, cardiac contusion) or diaphragm. Following trauma, patients with thoracic injuries are at risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This worsening of respiratory function can lead to requirement for mechanical ventilation. In addition, changes to gas exchange may also be generated or aggravated by mechanical ventilation as a result of barotrauma, biotrauma, or ventilation-associated pneumonia. Many mechanical ventilation strategies have been tried in trauma patients in the last 30 years to determine the optimal method of maximizing gas exchange with minimal lung damage. The driving pressure of the respiratory system has been shown to strongly correlate with mortality in a recent large retrospective ARDSnet study. Respiratory system driving pressure \[plateau pressure-positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)\] does not account for variable chest wall compliance especially in cases of chest trauma. Esophageal manometry can be utilized to determine transpulmonary driving pressure. A recent study suggests that utilizing PEEP titration to target positive transpulmonary pressure via esophageal manometry causes both improved elastance and driving pressures. Treatment strategies leading to decreased respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure at 24 h may be associated with improved 28 day mortality. However, currently no specific study with chest trauma patients exists. We propose to investigate the effect of hight transpulmonary driving pressure on duration on mechanical ventilation, length of stay and mortality in patients with sever chest trauma.

Interventions

OTHERno intervention

no intervention

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Major patients (18-90 years old) * Affiliated to the social security * Hospitalized following severe trauma chest trauma * Mechanical ventilatory support for a minimum of 72 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Minor patients, * Patients under tutorship / curatorship, * Pregnant or lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of mechanical Ventilation1 dayDuration of mechanical Ventilation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
During of SDRA1 dayDuring of SDRA
Length of stay in intensive care unit1 dayLength of stay in intensive care unit
Mortality1 dayMortality
Pulmonary compliance1 dayPulmonary compliance
Pulmonary stress and strain1 dayPulmonary stress and strain

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026