Skip to content

Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Approaches for MRI-Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer

Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Approaches for MRI-Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03366792
Enrollment
46
Registered
2017-12-08
Start date
2017-10-17
Completion date
2021-02-26
Last updated
2022-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate a transperineal biopsy approach (outside of the rectum) using MRI targeting to facilitate better access to the whole prostate gland and provide limited risk of infectious complications after biopsy.

Detailed description

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer death in men in the Western hemisphere. Definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer relies on biopsy of the prostate gland, which is historically performed by taking 12 random biopsies of the prostate by placing a needle through the rectum under ultrasound guidance. Recently, advances in MRI techniques have allowed identification of suspicious lesions within the prostate prior to biopsy, which has given rise to targeting biopsy cores to high-suspicion areas using fused ultrasound-MRI images. However, the most commonly used transrectal approach to biopsy is associated with a growing rate of infectious complications as well as poor sampling of the anterior region of the prostate, which is furthest from the rectum.

Interventions

DEVICEArtemis™ software system

Computerized targeting of mpMRI lesions. The computerized co-registration will then be performed by software within the Artemis™ system and will fuse the MR imaging with real-time ultrasound imaging.

Sponsors

NYU Langone Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* No contraindication to prostate biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, medical condition prohibiting abstinence from anti-platelet or anticoagulation therapies, anatomical considerations) Area of suspicion or known cancer focus on previously obtained mpMRI of the prostate (at least one lesion with MRI suspicion score \>3/5)

Exclusion criteria

* Prior pelvic radiotherapy * Evidence of urinary tract infection or significant urinary retention * Prostate instrumentation (e.g. prostate biopsy, transurethral prostate procedure) within 2 months prior to mpMRI * No evidence of suspicious lesions on mpMRI * Irreversible coagulopathy * Contraindication to sedation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Core Cancer Length2 MonthsGreater tumor length per core provides better diagnostic information. Data is reported as Transperineal (TP) core cancer length, Transrectal (TR) core cancer length, and for both (TP+TR)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of High-Grade Prostate Cancer Using Gleason Score2 MonthsHigh-grade prostate cancer is defined as a Gleason score \> 6; a score that is the sum of the two Gleason grades assigned to a prostate tumor and that is based on a scale of 2 to 10 with the lowest numbers indicating a slow-growing tumor unlikely to spread and the highest numbers indicating an aggressive tumor. Data is reported as a percentage for Transperineal (TP), Transrectal (TR), and for both (TP+TR)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MRI Targeted Biopsy
Artemis™ software system: Computerized targeting of mpMRI lesions. The computerized co-registration will then be performed by software within the Artemis™ system and will fuse the MR imaging with real-time ultrasound imaging.
31
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyIneligible (could not reach perinium)2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyStudy Closure (interim analysis showed no significant results)4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMRI Targeted Biopsy
Age, Continuous66 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Core Cancer Length

Greater tumor length per core provides better diagnostic information. Data is reported as Transperineal (TP) core cancer length, Transrectal (TR) core cancer length, and for both (TP+TR)

Time frame: 2 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MRI Targeted BiopsyCore Cancer LengthTP5 mm
MRI Targeted BiopsyCore Cancer LengthTR6 mm
MRI Targeted BiopsyCore Cancer LengthTP+TR5 mm
Secondary

Percentage of High-Grade Prostate Cancer Using Gleason Score

High-grade prostate cancer is defined as a Gleason score \> 6; a score that is the sum of the two Gleason grades assigned to a prostate tumor and that is based on a scale of 2 to 10 with the lowest numbers indicating a slow-growing tumor unlikely to spread and the highest numbers indicating an aggressive tumor. Data is reported as a percentage for Transperineal (TP), Transrectal (TR), and for both (TP+TR)

Time frame: 2 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MRI Targeted BiopsyPercentage of High-Grade Prostate Cancer Using Gleason ScoreTP34 percentage of prostate cancer grades
MRI Targeted BiopsyPercentage of High-Grade Prostate Cancer Using Gleason ScoreTR40 percentage of prostate cancer grades
MRI Targeted BiopsyPercentage of High-Grade Prostate Cancer Using Gleason ScoreTP+TR49 percentage of prostate cancer grades

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026