Skip to content

The Clinical Efficacy And Safety Of SkinStylus Microneedling System

The Clinical Efficacy And Safety Of SkinStylus Microneedling System for Ventral Torso Hypertrophic Scars: Clinical Results With 30 Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03366194
Enrollment
36
Registered
2017-12-08
Start date
2017-11-15
Completion date
2018-12-01
Last updated
2022-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix, Hypertrophic

Brief summary

The purpose of the trial is to provide objective evidence the SkinStylus may be used safely and effectively for the treatment of ventral torso hypertrophic scars.

Detailed description

1. The SkinStylus has been designated as a non-significant risk and therefore will be granted an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE). There are no meaningful changes to the SkinStylus® instructions for use and specifically no new risks will be introduced. 2. Each participant shall have at least one suitable ventral torso hypertropic scar of sufficient length that it may be easily visualized in two halfs. At the conclusion of the trial all participants shall be provided with a cross over treatment on the non-treated portion of the scar identical to that which was provided within the trial for the purpose of evening the ventral torso hypertrophic scar. This is entirely voluntary and participants may decline the treatment if they wish.

Interventions

DEVICESkinStylus Sterilock System

Microneedling device will be used to treat ventral hypertrophic scars.

Sponsors

Esthetic Education LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

3\. The trial shall be blinded and bias minimized in that three (3) physicians who are either dermatologists or plastic surgeons (and not affiliated with the trial or Esthetic Education LLC) shall review the baseline and treatment photographs and score them using the VAS scale (Visual Analogue Scale).

Intervention model description

Each participant shall have at least one suitable ventral torso hypertropic scar of sufficient length that it may be easily visualized in two halfs. At the conclusion of the trial all participants shall be provided with a cross over treatment on the non-treated portion of the scar identical to that which was provided within the trial for the purpose of evening the ventral torso hypertrophic scar.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
23 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. at least 23 years old 2. shall have at least one suitable ventral torso hypertropic scar of sufficient length that it may be easily visualized in two halfs. 3. The scar(s) must present along a flat surface suitable for application of the SkinStylus® device and consistent medical photography.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy or chance of pregnancy 2. Currently taking Coumadin/Warfarin® or heparin 3. Diagnosis of any type of bleeding disorder 4. Any history of keloid formation 5. Lidocaine, tetracaine, prilocaine, bupivacaine, or benzocaine hypersensitivity 6. Diagnosis of mental disorders requiring inpatient treatment 7. Presence of metal implants around the proposed treatment areas 8. Diagnosis of any undefined wasting disease (Cachexia for example) 9. Diagnosis of an active infection in the treatment area other than mild acne 10. Diagnosis of the presence of tumors or those who are being treated by chemotherapy or radiation therapy 11. Diagnosis of severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease 12. Diagnosis of renal failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Improvement Assessed Using the VAS Scar Scoring System90 days from date of last treatmentThe Visual Analog Scale Scar Scoring System (VAS Scar Scale) is a validated scar assessment scale with a minimum scar improvement value of 0.0 cm on one end of a 10.0 cm long line and 10.0 cm on the other end. The 0.0 cm represents no change in the appearance of the scar while 10.0 cm represents complete resolution of the scar. A panel of 3 expert graders viewed images of the treatment area and the control area before treatment and 90 days after the last treatment. The difference between the measurements taken at baseline and measurements taken two weeks following the end of the treatment of the treatment area was calculated for each participant, for each grader. The difference of all three graders analysis for each subject was averaged. Those participants with a VAS score on the treatment side that met the MCID of an improvement of at least 1.0 cm were identified in the results as responders. A higher score is a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Self-Reporting Improvement Using the Validated Self-Assessed Scar Improvement Scale Satisfaction Survey90 days from date of last treatmentThe Self-Assessed Scar Improvement Scale is a validated 6-point scale (-1 to 4) describing the patient's opinion regarding the overall improvement of the scar after treatment with 4 constituting the patient believing that the scar had a 75%-99% improvement, 3 constituting a 50%-75% improvement, 2 constituting a 25%-50% improvement, 1 constituting a 1%-25% improvement, 0 constituting no change, and -1 constituting an exacerbation of the scar's appearance. A higher score means a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental
Each subject shall have a relatively homogenous section of the total scar divided into two relatively equal sides. One side shall be treated with SkinStylus Sterilock System and the other not treated. The side that is chosen for treatment remains constant. The side that is chosen is done so randomly and prior to meeting the subject via a coin flip randomization. SkinStylus Sterilock System: Microneedling device will be used to treat ventral hypertrophic scars.
36
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
36 Participants
Age, Continuous41 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Chest vs abdomen2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
36 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 34
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Improvement Assessed Using the VAS Scar Scoring System

The Visual Analog Scale Scar Scoring System (VAS Scar Scale) is a validated scar assessment scale with a minimum scar improvement value of 0.0 cm on one end of a 10.0 cm long line and 10.0 cm on the other end. The 0.0 cm represents no change in the appearance of the scar while 10.0 cm represents complete resolution of the scar. A panel of 3 expert graders viewed images of the treatment area and the control area before treatment and 90 days after the last treatment. The difference between the measurements taken at baseline and measurements taken two weeks following the end of the treatment of the treatment area was calculated for each participant, for each grader. The difference of all three graders analysis for each subject was averaged. Those participants with a VAS score on the treatment side that met the MCID of an improvement of at least 1.0 cm were identified in the results as responders. A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame: 90 days from date of last treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ExperimentalNumber of Participants With Improvement Assessed Using the VAS Scar Scoring System22 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Self-Reporting Improvement Using the Validated Self-Assessed Scar Improvement Scale Satisfaction Survey

The Self-Assessed Scar Improvement Scale is a validated 6-point scale (-1 to 4) describing the patient's opinion regarding the overall improvement of the scar after treatment with 4 constituting the patient believing that the scar had a 75%-99% improvement, 3 constituting a 50%-75% improvement, 2 constituting a 25%-50% improvement, 1 constituting a 1%-25% improvement, 0 constituting no change, and -1 constituting an exacerbation of the scar's appearance. A higher score means a better outcome.

Time frame: 90 days from date of last treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ExperimentalNumber of Patients Self-Reporting Improvement Using the Validated Self-Assessed Scar Improvement Scale Satisfaction Survey28 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026