Skip to content

Two Narrative Medicine Interventions in Type 1 Diabetes

Comparison Between Two Narrative Medicine Approaches in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D): a Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03365349
Enrollment
87
Registered
2017-12-07
Start date
2012-02-01
Completion date
2013-08-01
Last updated
2017-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type1diabetes

Brief summary

a randomized prospective study aims at comparing the impact of a living theater session with a simple writing workshop on emotional distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire PAID) and illness perception ( Illness Perception Questionnaire IPQR) during a 5 day education course

Detailed description

This randomized prospective pilot study aims at comparing the impact of a living theater session with a simple writing workshop on emotional distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire PAID) and illness perception ( Illness Perception Questionnaire IPQR) during a 5 day education course on Functional Insulin Therapy (FIT). Questionaries at T0 (course day 1 ) and T1 (3 months later). qualitative interviews in a sub group of patients random G1 and G2 subgroup at T1, with a general inductive approach to capture all representations

Interventions

OTHERparticipating in a session of living theatre

participating to a session of living theatre which consists in writing a story about life with diabetes, which is then transformed to a script to be played by professional actors co-directed by the patient with the support of the Director to create a short play

OTHERwriting workshop

one session consisting for the patient of writing a Letter to his/her own diabetes and then to read it to the group of patients and the healthcare providers.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* type 1 diabetes

Exclusion criteria

* no french language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline IPQR (Illness Perception Questionnaire) score at 3 months3 months after interventionIllness Perception Questionnaire (IPQR) There is no total score for IPQR Nine subscales are reported for IPQR. High scores on the identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical dimensions represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to the illness, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness, and the cyclical nature of the condition. High scores on the personal control, treatment control and coherence dimensions, represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness and a personal understanding of the condition. Minimal and maximal score are respectively 0 and 14 for identity, 0 and 30 for timeline, consequences, personal control, and emotional representations, 0 and 25 for treatment control and illness coherence illness, 0-20 for timeline cyclical

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
comparison of the two groups concerning answers to qualitative interviews at T 3 months after the intervention3 months after interventionA psychologist conducted qualitative interviews according to a blinded process in a subgroup of 6 patients at T3 months, with a general inductive approach to capture all representations on diabetes and the session. Transcribed Interviews were analyzed regarding inductive coding and 2 independent investigators built and tested a coding schedule.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026