Critical Illness
Conditions
Brief summary
Malnutrition is very common in critically ill patients. It is quite important to evaluate nutritional status precisely. Heyland et al firstly reported NUTRIC score including age, APACHE II score, SOFA score, number of commorbidities, days from hospital to ICU admission and IL-6. Because the IL-6 is not routinely checked at ICU. A modified NUTRIC score without IL-6 is more practical. Previous studies showed lower in-hospital mortality in higher nutritional risk patients with higher caloric intake compared with lower caloric intake. However, there is still controversial regarding the in-hospital mortality between full caloric feeding and permissive underfeeding in critically ill patients. Herein the investigators conduct a study to investigate what kinds of nutritional supplements will decrease in-hospital mortality in different nutritional risk patients.
Interventions
Non-blind to randomize to trophic feeding group and volume based feeding group in the first six days (Day 0-\>Day 6). The definition of trophic feeding is continue feeding with feeding rate: 20 kcal/hr.
Non-blind to randomize to trophic feeding group and volume based feeding group in the first six days (Day 0-\>Day 6). The definition Volume-based feeding also use continue feeding by feeding protocol
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 1\. Medical intensive care unit patients 2. age elder than 20 years old 3. Intubated with ventilator support patients 4. Predicted ICU stay longer than 72 hours
Exclusion criteria
* 1\. NPO patients 2. Contraindication for enteral feeding 3. TPN use 4. Upper or lower GI bleeding patients 5. Feeding with gastrostomy or Jejunostomy patients 6. Metoclopramide related EPS or Torsades de pointes history
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| In-hospital mortality | 90 days | mortality or discharge |
Countries
Taiwan