Skip to content

Modulating Impulsivity in Suicidal Adolescents With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Modulating Impulsivity in Suicidal Adolescents With tDCS: A Proof of Concept Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03365102
Acronym
tDCS
Enrollment
64
Registered
2017-12-07
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impulsive Behavior

Brief summary

As a first step toward investigating whether modulation of impulsivity and associated neural pathways may yield clinically meaningful changes in risk for adolescent suicidal behavior, the R21 is a proof-of concept study evaluating the potential for tDCS targeting brain regions associated with behavioral impulsivity (right inferior frontal gyrus \[rIFG\]) and cognitive impulsivity (left orbitofrontal cortex \[lOFC\]) to modulate these facets of impulsivity in a sample of adolescent suicide attempters. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive anodal tDCS over the rIFG, anodal tDCS over the lOFC, or a sham stimulation condition, in a three-group design. Task-based measures of behavioral and cognitive impulsivity will be administered before and after tDCS or sham stimulation. Additionally, electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potential (ERP) data will be collected during the impulsivity tasks, and resting-state EEG data will be collected pre- and post-tDCS administration to confirm engagement of the targeted brain regions and to delineating the neural pathways underlying the effects of tDCS on impulsivity.

Detailed description

Suicide is one of the leading causes of death in adolescence. To improve the ability to predict and prevent suicidal behavior, there is a pressing need for research in this area to advance beyond identifying risk factors toward a greater focus on the mechanisms of risk for this behavior. In particular, elucidating the neural pathways underlying risk for suicidal behavior is important insofar as such work may yield specific and modifiable targets for clinical intervention. The adoption of new experimental paradigms providing experimental control over potentially modifiable risk factors has been recommended as a means of meaningfully advancing the field in this regard. Although yet to be applied to the study of suicidality, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), in conjunction with measures of electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs), may hold promise as an experimental paradigm in the study of potentially modifiable risk factors, and underlying neural mechanisms, for suicidality. One such risk factor of particular relevance to suicide in adolescence is state-sensitive aspects of impulsivity. Impulsivity has been consistently linked with suicidality, with this association appearing to be stronger in adolescence than adulthood. As a first step toward investigating whether modulation of impulsivity and associated neural pathways may yield clinically meaningful changes in risk for adolescent suicidal behavior, the R21 is a proof-of concept study evaluating the potential for tDCS targeting brain regions associated with behavioral impulsivity (right inferior frontal gyrus \[rIFG\]) and cognitive impulsivity (left orbitofrontal cortex \[lOFC\]) to modulate these facets of impulsivity in a sample of adolescent suicide attempters. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive anodal tDCS over the rIFG, anodal tDCS over the lOFC, or a sham stimulation condition, in a three-group design. Task-based measures of behavioral and cognitive impulsivity will be administered before and after tDCS or sham stimulation. Additionally, EEG and ERP data will be collected during the impulsivity tasks, and resting-state EEG data will be collected pre- and post-tDCS administration to confirm engagement of the targeted brain regions and to delineating the neural pathways underlying the effects of tDCS on impulsivity.

Interventions

DEVICEanodal tDCS over the rIFG,

tDCS at a constant current of 1.5 milliampere (mA) will be applied for one 20-minute session over the right inferior frontal gyrus . Resting-state EEG for 10 minutes will be recorded immediately prior to and after tDCS. After post-tDCS resting state EEG is acquired, EEG is recorded to extract Evoked Response Potentials in a single-blind procedure. The participants and assessors will be blind to experimental condition.

DEVICEanodal tDCS over the lOFC,

tDCS at a constant current of 1.5 mA will be applied for one 20-minute session over the left orbitofrontal cortex . Resting-state EEG for 10 minutes will be recorded immediately prior to and after tDCS. After post-tDCS resting state EEG is acquired, EEG is recorded to extract Evoked Response Potentials in a single-blind procedure. The participants and assessors will be blind to experimental condition.

DEVICEsham tDCS stimulation condition

In the sham condition, the current will be ramped up to 1.5 mA for 30 seconds and then ramped back down to 0. As this commonly used sham procedure produces a brief tingling sensation, participants are kept unaware of their experimental condition. Resting-state EEG for 10 minutes will be recorded immediately prior to and after the sham tDCS. After post-sham stimulation resting state EEG is acquired, EEG is recorded to extract Evoked Response Potentials in a single-blind procedure. The participants and assessors will be blind to experimental condition.

Sponsors

Lifespan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Neither participant or outcome aware of condition

Intervention model description

anodal tDCS over the rIFG, anodal tDCS over the lOFC, sham stimulation condition

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* have attempted suicide prior to admission * speak and read English fluently * do not display evidence of significant cognitive impairment, based on a standard psychiatric exam as well as school records on admission * are not actively psychotic at time of intake.

Exclusion criteria

* a significant general medical condition * history of seizure, head injury, brain surgery or tumor * intracranial metallic implants or implanted electrical devices * substance abuse or dependence in the past six months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stop Signal Task (SST)Within an hour post-stimulation conditionThe Stop-Signal Task (SST) is a task requiring inhibition of a prepotent motor response. The SST requires participants to respond to a target stimulus as quickly and accurately as possible by pressing a button, but also to withhold their response when they hear an auditory signal. Thus, this task involves a competition between activating and inhibiting processes. The primary outcome variable is change in the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) for the task administered seconds to minutes before and seconds to minutes after stimulation. The theoretical minimum is zero seconds and there is no theoretical maximum. Higher SSRT scores reflect greater impulsivity.
Delay Discounting TaskWithin an hour post-stimulation conditionThis task assessed discounting larger future rewards for smaller immediate ones. The point where a person is equally likely to prefer immediate vs delayed reward (the indifference point) is determined for several and combinations of reward sizes and lengths of time. Area under the curve (AUC) is calculated by summing the results of the following for each delay and indifference point pair: x2-x1\[(y1 + y2)/2\]. x1 and x2 are successive delays and y1 and y2 are indifference points for those delays. AUC range=0-1. Larger AUCs reflect less impulsivity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anodal tDCS Over the rIFG,
anodal tDCS over the rIFG, anodal tDCS over the rIFG,: tDCS at a constant current of 1.5 milliampere (mA) will be applied for one 20-minute session over the right inferior frontal gyrus . Resting-state EEG for 10 minutes will be recorded immediately prior to and after tDCS. After post-tDCS resting state EEG is acquired, EEG is recorded to extract Evoked Response Potentials in a single-blind procedure. The participants and assessors will be blind to experimental condition.
18
Anodal tDCS Over the lOFC
anodal tDCS over the lOFC anodal tDCS over the lOFC,: tDCS at a constant current of 1.5 mA will be applied for one 20-minute session over the left orbitofrontal cortex . Resting-state EEG for 10 minutes will be recorded immediately prior to and after tDCS. After post-tDCS resting state EEG is acquired, EEG is recorded to extract Evoked Response Potentials in a single-blind procedure. The participants and assessors will be blind to experimental condition.
21
Sham tDCS Stimulation
sham tDCS stimulation sham tDCS stimulation condition: In the sham condition, the current will be ramped up to 1.5 mA for 30 seconds and then ramped back down to 0. As this commonly used sham procedure produces a brief tingling sensation, participants are kept unaware of their experimental condition. Resting-state EEG for 10 minutes will be recorded immediately prior to and after the sham tDCS. After post-sham stimulation resting state EEG is acquired, EEG is recorded to extract Evoked Response Potentials in a single-blind procedure. The participants and assessors will be blind to experimental condition.
19
Total58

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnodal tDCS Over the rIFG,Anodal tDCS Over the lOFCSham tDCS StimulationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants21 Participants19 Participants58 Participants
Conners-3 Self-Report
Hyperactivity/impulsivity subscale
14 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
12 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
14.39285714 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.191354839
Conners-3 Self-Report
Inattention subscale
16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
15 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
15.67857143 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.250855918
Delay discounting task.45 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
.31 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22
.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
0.415454545 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.284301081
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants5 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants16 Participants17 Participants46 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
PROMIS Depression49 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
47 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
47 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
47.64285714 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.22728587
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
7 Participants6 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants12 Participants12 Participants31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants21 participants19 participants58 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants17 Participants14 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Stop Signal Task353 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 414
276 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 328
233 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 247
284.8076923 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 330.2148165

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 220 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 220 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 220 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Delay Discounting Task

This task assessed discounting larger future rewards for smaller immediate ones. The point where a person is equally likely to prefer immediate vs delayed reward (the indifference point) is determined for several and combinations of reward sizes and lengths of time. Area under the curve (AUC) is calculated by summing the results of the following for each delay and indifference point pair: x2-x1\[(y1 + y2)/2\]. x1 and x2 are successive delays and y1 and y2 are indifference points for those delays. AUC range=0-1. Larger AUCs reflect less impulsivity.

Time frame: Within an hour post-stimulation condition

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS Over the rIFG,Delay Discounting Task.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Anodal tDCS Over the lOFCDelay Discounting Task.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Sham tDCS StimulationDelay Discounting Task.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Primary

Stop Signal Task (SST)

The Stop-Signal Task (SST) is a task requiring inhibition of a prepotent motor response. The SST requires participants to respond to a target stimulus as quickly and accurately as possible by pressing a button, but also to withhold their response when they hear an auditory signal. Thus, this task involves a competition between activating and inhibiting processes. The primary outcome variable is change in the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) for the task administered seconds to minutes before and seconds to minutes after stimulation. The theoretical minimum is zero seconds and there is no theoretical maximum. Higher SSRT scores reflect greater impulsivity.

Time frame: Within an hour post-stimulation condition

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS Over the rIFG,Stop Signal Task (SST)255 millisecondsStandard Deviation 463
Anodal tDCS Over the lOFCStop Signal Task (SST)215 millisecondsStandard Deviation 278
Sham tDCS StimulationStop Signal Task (SST)297 millisecondsStandard Deviation 278

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026