Skip to content

Evaluation on Efficacy of Total Artificial Disc Replacement (TDR) of Cervical Spondylosis

Evaluation on Efficacy of Total Artificial Disc Replacement (TDR) of Cervical Spondylosis: a Cohort Prospective Follow-up for 5 Years

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03364816
Enrollment
150
Registered
2017-12-07
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2017-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Spondylosis

Keywords

cervical spondylosis, artificial disc replacement, complications, photographic indicators, functional efficacy

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of 3 different types of cervical disc prosthesis (Prodisc-C, Mobi-C and Prestige-LP) in the treatment of cervical spondylosis.

Detailed description

A cohort, retrospective analysis will be performed of 150 patients who were in implementation of artificial disc replacement in our department from 2008 to 2012 and accepted a regular postoperatively follow-up up to 5 years, the sample will be divided into 3 groups according to prosthesis and 50 people in each group. The outcome will be measured among 3 groups respectively on the operation (such as operation time, intraoperative bleeding.), postoperative complications (such as prosthesis sinking, displacement and prolapse, adjacent segments degeneration and heterotopic ossification), photographic indicators and functional efficacy analysis and then a comparison for self-contrast pre- and post-operatively.

Interventions

PROCEDURETDR

total artificial disc replacement

Sponsors

Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients was diagnosed as cervical spondylosis based on imaging and symptomology; 2. patients were purely underwent TDR within the three kinds of prosthesis; 3. the range of participants is from 20-65 years; 4. conservative treatment of 6 months is invalid; 5. never had cervical operations.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients suffered from cervical trauma or congenital malformations; 2. non-artificial cervical disc replacement or hybrid surgery; 3. ones who refused to be followed up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
JOA score5 yearsThe whole name is Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores for Assessment of Cervical spondylosis, the range of JOA is 0-17 and the full score is 17 to represent a normal function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prosthesis sinking5 yearsprosthesis sinking is defined by a sink of 2mm about the artificial disk postoperatively.
range of motion (ROM)5 yearsrange of motion

Contacts

Primary ContactShuai Xu
1204649202@qq.com(86)18811792718

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026