Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Stroke rehabilitation, Upper extremity, Posture
Brief summary
This study evaluates the relationship between seated posture and fine motor performance in a drawing task in people with stroke and in healthy control subjects.
Detailed description
Current stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines support an interprofessional approach which integrates discipline-specific goals into a comprehensive plan of care. However, there has been a failure to implement interprofessional guidelines into today's stroke rehabilitation clinical practice. Instead it is common that one discipline focuses on recovery of posture, while another discipline focuses on recovery of fine motor skills. The investigators argue that control of the hand is not independent from postural control. In fact, treating them separately ignores the kinematic and muscular linkages connecting the trunk to the hand via the scapula and proximal arm. It also ignores evidence that postural and hand muscles have overlapping cortical representations thus likely have similar neural control networks. Hence, the overall goal of this project is to demonstrate the relationship of posture and fine motor skills to advance stroke rehabilitation. The study will include two groups, stroke survivors and neurologically healthy controls, and both will perform a tracing task while seated on a backless bench. The task will be performed twice, at baseline and after giving participants cues to improve their posture. Both task repetitions will be performed in a single session on the same day. Kinetic and kinematic data will be collected to evaluate posture, postural stability and fine motor performance. Data collected at baseline will be used to examine the relationship between postural impairments and fine motor deficits. Additionally, we will evaluate the effects of postural cues on body segment alignment, stability and fine motor performance.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALPostural counseling
A therapist will provide verbal/physical cues to improve the participants posture
Sponsors
Medical University of South Carolina
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Stroke survivors: Inclusion Criteria: * experienced uni-hemispheric ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke 3 mo - 7 yrs prior * ability to grasp and hold a stylus for the duration of the experiments * passive motion throughout the paretic UE within 20° of normal * dominant side affected
Exclusion criteria
* lesion in brainstem or cerebellum * presence of other neuro-disease impairing motor skills * unable to understand 3-step directions * pain, orthopedic condition or impaired corrected vision that would alter reaching Healthy Controls: Inclusion Criteria: * no history of stroke or incomplete spinal cord injury * no medical, orthopedic, neurological, or uncorrected visual condition that would limit the ability to participate in upper extremity testing
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in tracing smoothness from baseline to after postural counseling | Within 24 hours | Change in the average jerk of the hand trajectory during a tracing task |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in center of pressure displacement from baseline to after postural counseling | Within 24 hours | Change in the maximum center of pressure displacement during a tracing task |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed