Skip to content

T790M Mutation Testing in Blood by Different Methodologies

T790M Mutation Testing in Blood by Different Methodologies_RING Project

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03363139
Enrollment
72
Registered
2017-12-06
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2019-03-30
Last updated
2020-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NSCLC Stage IV

Brief summary

Three laboratories will participate in the study. Each laboratory will analyze the same samples by different methodologies according to the flow indicated in figure 1. This design will allow comparing the agreement performance of different methods available for T790M identification in circulating-free DNA isolated from peripheral blood.

Detailed description

Three blood samples per patient will be collected once at the time of progression, assessed by CT Scans according to RECIST criteria v.1.1 and before the patients start a new treatment The blood samples (5-10 mL each) will be collected in one Cell-Free DNA BCT Streck® and 2 PTT EDTA K2 (BECTON DICKINSON) collection tubes. All samples will be labeled properly with the patient identification number and date of extraction. These samples will be stored and distributed through the 3 participating laboratories until completion of all the analyses, according to the flowchart in Figure 1. These samples will be registered in the samples collection of the Institute of Health Carlos III Registry. These samples will be kept in each participant laboratory after the completion of the RING study and the patient will be informed of that in the patient information sheet and informed consent. cfDNA will be extracted using as starting volume 1 ml of plasma with a Maxwell® RSC instrument (Promega), using the Maxwell® RSC cfDNA Plasma Kit (MR), as specified by the manufacturer or with a Qiasymphony instrument (Qiagen company). Additionally, for BEAMing analysis, 3 ml of plasma will be used for cfDNA isolation using the the QIAamp® Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen company), following the manufacturer instructions. Circulating free DNA from peripheral blood sample is an adequate source for T790M resistance mutation testing. However, comparison across different platforms has been scarcely reported. Discordant results for EGFR biomarker testing could impact patient management.

Interventions

Patients that received Tyrosin Kinase inhibitors and progressed

Sponsors

Spanish Lung Cancer Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with EGFR mutant, stage IIIB and IV non small cell lung cancer and who have progressed assessed by CT Scans according to RECIST criteria v.1.1 to first or second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (e.g. gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib) including patients who received a chemotherapy line before TKI treatment. Samples have to be drawn before the patient starts a new treatment, * Patients have to sign the informed consent of the study * Patients aged ≥ 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients progressing to third generation EGFR TKIs (e.g. Osimertinib (TKI)) * No possibility of venipuncture.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the agreement between qualitative methodologiesAt 12 months from the first inclusionTo evaluate the agreement performance of different methodologies available in Spain for T790M identification in circulating-free DNA isolated from blood collected at the time of progression on a first or second generation TKI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of the different methodologiesAt 12 months from the first inclusionTo compare the cost of the different methodologies
Specificity and sensitivity of each cfDNA methodAt 12 months from the first inclusionTo estimate the specificity and sensitivity of each cfDNA method.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Turnaround time of different methodologiesAt 12 months from the first inclusionTo compare turnaround time of the different methodologies
Ease of use of different methodologiesAt 12 months from the first inclusionTo compare the ease of use of the different methodologies

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026