Skip to content

Geniculate Artery Embolization for Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis (OA)

Randomized Placebo-Controlled Single Blinded Study of Geniculate Artery Embolization for Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03362957
Enrollment
21
Registered
2017-12-05
Start date
2018-05-25
Completion date
2020-04-24
Last updated
2021-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteo Arthritis Knee

Keywords

embolization, vascular

Brief summary

Purpose: To evaluate embolization as a treatment for OA related knee pain versus placebo to demonstrate the actual effect of embolization on pain and disability. Participants: There will be 21 subjects enrolled over the age 40 with knee pain secondary to arthritis. Procedures (methods): This will be a single-blinded randomized-controlled study of GAE versus placebo in a small population with knee pain secondary to arthritis to determine safety and efficacy. Clinical procedures and evaluations will consist of a preoperative screening assessment to determine if the potential study subject meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria, enrollment, surgical procedure for geniculate artery embolization, and follow-up visits at 24 hours, 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, & 12 months. An MRI may be performed after the 1-month visit.

Detailed description

This will be a single-blinded randomized-controlled study of GAE versus placebo in a small population with knee pain secondary to arthritis to determine safety and efficacy. After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval of a written informed consent and over, approximately a 24 month duration, N=21 subjects will be recruited. Only subjects ≥ 40 years will be screened for study recruitment. Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio of GAE:Placebo and will be blinded from study treatment (see flow chart below). The placebo procedure will be a diagnostic angiogram of the knee, without embolization. Appropriate measures will be taken to ensure patients and nursing staff caring for the patient are blinded to assignment. Each patient will be told at the time of recruitment that they may be randomly assigned to sham, but if after 1 month they have not had symptom improvement, their assigned procedure would be revealed and, if they had undergone a sham procedure, they will be allowed to proceed with embolization. This second procedure should be shorter than a complete angiogram and embolization, as the detailed angiogram will not need to be repeated, and therefore both arms will have similar total radiation dose. Clinical procedures and evaluations will consist of a preoperative screening assessment to determine if the potential study subject meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria, enrollment, surgical procedure for geniculate artery embolization, and follow-up visits at 24 hours, 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, & 12 months. An MRI may be performed after the 1-month visit.

Interventions

Gel-Bead Microspheres will be used for geniculate artery embolization (GAE) in subjects with knee osteoarthritis.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSham Procedure

Patients will receive a sham procedure, which will include a diagnostic angiogram

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This will be a single-blinded randomized-controlled study of GAE versus placebo in a small population with knee pain secondary to arthritis to determine safety and efficacy. The placebo procedure will be a diagnostic angiogram of the knee, without embolization. Appropriate measures will be taken to ensure patients and nursing staff caring for the patient are blinded to assignment. Each patient will be told at the time of recruitment that they may be randomly assigned to sham, but if after 1 month they have not had symptom improvement, their assigned procedure would be revealed and, if they had undergone a sham procedure, they will be allowed to proceed with embolization.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Moderate to severe knee pain (visual analog scale (VAS) \> 50 mm), and Pain refractory to at least 3 months\* of conservative therapies (anti- inflammatory drugs, or physical therapy, or muscle strengthening, or intra- articular injections), and Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1, 2 or 3 on radiograph of the knee.

Exclusion criteria

Current local infection, or Life expectancy less than 6 months, or Known advanced atherosclerosis, or Rheumatoid or infectious arthritis, or Prior knee surgery, or Uncorrectable coagulopathy including international normalized ratio (INR) \> 2.5 or platelets \< 30,000, or Iodine allergy resulting in anaphylaxis, or Renal dysfunction as defined by serum creatinine \>1.6 dl/mg or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 obtained within the past 30 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 33 months following procedureThe pain intensity is assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), which is a horizontal line 100 mm in length. Subjects mark the VAS with a single vertical line to indicate their current pain level, with 0 mm representing No Pain and 100 mm representing Worst Possible Pain. Pain will be assessed at each of the patient's follow-up visits and used to measure the change from baseline (prior to the GAE procedure). The investigators will use this to measure if the patient's pain level decreases.
Mean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 11 month following procedureThe pain intensity is assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), which is a horizontal line 100 mm in length. Subjects mark the VAS with a single vertical line to indicate their current pain level, with 0 mm representing No Pain and 100 mm representing Worst Possible Pain. Pain will be assessed at each of the patient's follow-up visits and used to measure the change from baseline (prior to the GAE procedure). The investigators will use this to measure if the patient's pain level decreases.
Mean WOMAC Scores at Month 33 months following procedureWestern Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be used to measure function. This is a score derived from a questionnaire in which the patient answers questions regarding rheumatic symptoms in the subcategories of pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Individuals select the level of difficulty they have performing various tasks using a 5 point Likert scale (0=None, 1=Slightly, 3=Very, 4=Extremely). Then, results are scored with a total score (minimum 0; maximum 96). A higher score indicates more difficulty in each of the categories.
Mean WOMAC Scores at Month 66 months following procedureWestern Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be used to measure function. This is a score derived from a questionnaire in which the patient answers questions regarding rheumatic symptoms in the subcategories of pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Individuals select the level of difficulty they have performing various tasks using a 5 point Likert scale (0=None, 1=Slightly, 3=Very, 4=Extremely). Then, results are scored with a total score (minimum 0; maximum 96). A higher score indicates more difficulty in each of the categories.
Mean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 66 months following procedureThe pain intensity is assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), which is a horizontal line 100 mm in length. Subjects mark the VAS with a single vertical line to indicate their current pain level, with 0 mm representing No Pain and 100 mm representing Worst Possible Pain. Pain will be assessed at each of the patient's follow-up visits and used to measure the change from baseline (prior to the GAE procedure). The investigators will use this to measure if the patient's pain level decreases.
Mean WOMAC Scores at Month 11 month following procedureWestern Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be used to measure function. This is a score derived from a questionnaire in which the patient answers questions regarding rheumatic symptoms in the subcategories of pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Individuals select the level of difficulty they have performing various tasks using a 5 point Likert scale (0=None, 1=Slightly, 3=Very, 4=Extremely). Then, results are scored with a total score (minimum 0; maximum 96). A higher score indicates more difficulty in each of the categories.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Reduction in Medication12 months following procedureReduction in the number or strength of previously initiated OA medical therapy (e.g. NSAIDs) at 6 months follow-up, which will be summarized using counts.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patient With Complications6 months following procedure for the GAE Procedure and Crossover Arm Arms/Groups and 1 month following procedure for the Sham Procedure Arm/GroupThe number and description of complications, adverse events, or poor outcomes (such as no improvement in pain) that are secondary to the GAE procedure, which will be summarized using counts.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

All patients that received the sham procedure crossed over into the crossover arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GAE Procedure
Patients will be randomized to receive the Geniculate Artery Embolization Procedure Geniculate Artery Embolization: Gel-Bead Microspheres will be used for geniculate artery embolization (GAE) in subjects with knee osteoarthritis.
14
Sham Procedure First, Then GAE Procedure
Patients will be randomized to a sham procedure. Sham Procedure: Patients will receive a sham procedure, which will include a diagnostic angiogram If after 1 month patients see no improvement, they will be unblinded and crossover to receive the Geniculate Artery Embolization Procedure Geniculate Artery Embolization: Gel-Bead Microspheres will be used for geniculate artery embolization (GAE) in subjects with knee osteoarthritis.
7
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalGAE ProcedureSham Procedure First, Then GAE Procedure
Age, Continuous63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants11 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 Participants14 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
VAS
Baseline
14.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
13.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
15.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
VAS
baseline following sham procedure
14 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
14 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
WOMAC
Baseline Following Sham Procedure
65.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
65.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
WOMAC
Baseline for study
66.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
64.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
70.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 70 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 142 / 75 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 70 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 1

The pain intensity is assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), which is a horizontal line 100 mm in length. Subjects mark the VAS with a single vertical line to indicate their current pain level, with 0 mm representing No Pain and 100 mm representing Worst Possible Pain. Pain will be assessed at each of the patient's follow-up visits and used to measure the change from baseline (prior to the GAE procedure). The investigators will use this to measure if the patient's pain level decreases.

Time frame: 1 month following procedure

Population: One participant was excluded from the GAE arm due to increased pain that resulted in additional medication and was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GAE ProcedureMean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 130.5 mmStandard Deviation 27.9
Sham ProcedureMean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 178.4 mmStandard Deviation 10.2
Crossover ArmMean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 139.8 mmStandard Deviation 31
Primary

Mean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 3

The pain intensity is assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), which is a horizontal line 100 mm in length. Subjects mark the VAS with a single vertical line to indicate their current pain level, with 0 mm representing No Pain and 100 mm representing Worst Possible Pain. Pain will be assessed at each of the patient's follow-up visits and used to measure the change from baseline (prior to the GAE procedure). The investigators will use this to measure if the patient's pain level decreases.

Time frame: 3 months following procedure

Population: One participant was excluded from the GAE arm due to increased pain that resulted in additional medication and was excluded from the analysis. One additional participant in this arm did not have data available at the 3 month visit. All sham participants crossed over to receive treatment after 1 month, thus no 3-month data available for this group. One patient in the crossover arm did not have VAS data available for the 3 month visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GAE ProcedureMean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 321.3 mmStandard Deviation 27.9
Crossover ArmMean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 341.2 mmStandard Deviation 31.1
Primary

Mean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 6

The pain intensity is assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), which is a horizontal line 100 mm in length. Subjects mark the VAS with a single vertical line to indicate their current pain level, with 0 mm representing No Pain and 100 mm representing Worst Possible Pain. Pain will be assessed at each of the patient's follow-up visits and used to measure the change from baseline (prior to the GAE procedure). The investigators will use this to measure if the patient's pain level decreases.

Time frame: 6 months following procedure

Population: One participant was excluded from the GAE arm due to increased pain that resulted in additional medication and was excluded from the analysis. All sham participants crossed over to receive treatment after 1 month, thus no 6-month data available for this group. One patient in the crossover arm did not have VAS data available for the 6 month visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GAE ProcedureMean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 620.3 mmStandard Deviation 25.6
Crossover ArmMean Patient Pain as Measured by VAS at Month 619.2 mmStandard Deviation 35.3
Primary

Mean WOMAC Scores at Month 1

Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be used to measure function. This is a score derived from a questionnaire in which the patient answers questions regarding rheumatic symptoms in the subcategories of pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Individuals select the level of difficulty they have performing various tasks using a 5 point Likert scale (0=None, 1=Slightly, 3=Very, 4=Extremely). Then, results are scored with a total score (minimum 0; maximum 96). A higher score indicates more difficulty in each of the categories.

Time frame: 1 month following procedure

Population: One participant was excluded from the GAE arm due to increased pain that resulted in additional medication and was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GAE ProcedureMean WOMAC Scores at Month 134.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Sham ProcedureMean WOMAC Scores at Month 165.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
Crossover ArmMean WOMAC Scores at Month 146.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.6
Primary

Mean WOMAC Scores at Month 3

Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be used to measure function. This is a score derived from a questionnaire in which the patient answers questions regarding rheumatic symptoms in the subcategories of pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Individuals select the level of difficulty they have performing various tasks using a 5 point Likert scale (0=None, 1=Slightly, 3=Very, 4=Extremely). Then, results are scored with a total score (minimum 0; maximum 96). A higher score indicates more difficulty in each of the categories.

Time frame: 3 months following procedure

Population: One participant was excluded from the GAE arm due to increased pain that resulted in additional medication and was excluded from the analysis. One additional participant in this arm did not have data available at the 3 month visit. All sham participants crossed over to receive treatment after 1 month, thus no 3-month data available for this group. One patient in the crossover arm did not have WOMAC data available for the 3 month visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GAE ProcedureMean WOMAC Scores at Month 319.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Crossover ArmMean WOMAC Scores at Month 339.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3
Primary

Mean WOMAC Scores at Month 6

Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be used to measure function. This is a score derived from a questionnaire in which the patient answers questions regarding rheumatic symptoms in the subcategories of pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Individuals select the level of difficulty they have performing various tasks using a 5 point Likert scale (0=None, 1=Slightly, 3=Very, 4=Extremely). Then, results are scored with a total score (minimum 0; maximum 96). A higher score indicates more difficulty in each of the categories.

Time frame: 6 months following procedure

Population: One participant was excluded from the GAE arm due to increased pain that resulted in additional medication and was excluded from the analysis. All sham participants crossed over to receive treatment after 1 month, thus no 6-month data available for this group. One crossover participant did not have WOMAC data available for the 6 month visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GAE ProcedureMean WOMAC Scores at Month 629 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Crossover ArmMean WOMAC Scores at Month 626 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31
Secondary

Number of Participants With Reduction in Medication

Reduction in the number or strength of previously initiated OA medical therapy (e.g. NSAIDs) at 6 months follow-up, which will be summarized using counts.

Time frame: 12 months following procedure

Population: All participants in the sham arm crossed over 1 month after the sham procedure, thus no 6-month data available for this group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GAE ProcedureNumber of Participants With Reduction in Medication5 Participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Reduction in Medication0 Participants
Crossover ArmNumber of Participants With Reduction in Medication1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Patient With Complications

The number and description of complications, adverse events, or poor outcomes (such as no improvement in pain) that are secondary to the GAE procedure, which will be summarized using counts.

Time frame: 6 months following procedure for the GAE Procedure and Crossover Arm Arms/Groups and 1 month following procedure for the Sham Procedure Arm/Group

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GAE ProcedureNumber of Patient With Complications8 Participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Patient With Complications2 Participants
Crossover ArmNumber of Patient With Complications5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026