Skip to content

Standard Colonoscopy Versus Colonoscopy With Endocuff Vision

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Definition White-light Colonoscopy Versus High-Definition White-light Colonoscopy With Endocuff Vision for Endpoints of Procedural Times

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03361917
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-12-05
Start date
2017-12-11
Completion date
2018-04-18
Last updated
2019-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Cancer, Colorectal Adenoma, Colorectal Polyp

Keywords

Colonoscopy screening, Colonscopy procedure

Brief summary

This study seeks to compare colonoscopy results between a standard method and one using a distal scope attachment (Endocuff Vision).

Detailed description

For this study, subjects will be randomized into one of two groups (those who receive a standard colonoscopy and those who receive a colonoscopy with an Endocuff Vision attachment). Results will then be compared between the two; these include insertion time (time it takes to reach the cecum of the large intestine), inspection time (time spent examining the large intestine), the total time per each polypectomy (removal of polyps in the colon), and the total procedure time of the colonoscopy.

Interventions

Subjects that are randomized to undergo their colonoscopy procedure with the Endocuff Vision device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure.

Sponsors

Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject referred for a screening or surveillance colonoscopy * Subject is aged 40 years or older * Subject has the ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prior history of colon cancer * History of inflammatory bowel disease * Prior surgical resection of any part of the colon * Use of antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants that precludes the removal of polyps during the procedure * History of polyposis syndrome or HNPCC * Family history of colon cancer in a first-degree relative \< 60 years or two first degree relatives with colorectal cancer * Inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inspection Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)During the withdrawal portion of the colonoscopy procedureInspection time is time spent actually examining the colon. This was measured with a stopwatch and calculated by subtracting washing, suctioning, polypectomy and biopsy times from total withdrawal time. It was measured during colonoscopy by a study assistant using a stopwatch.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insertion Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)During the insertion portion of the colonoscopy procedureInsertion time is the time it takes from the colonoscope first being inserted to when the furthest section of the colon (which is called the cecum) is reached.
Total Procedure Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)During the colonoscopy procedureTotal procedure time is the time from the initial insertion through the complete withdrawal of the scope
Detection RatesDuring the colonoscopy procedureThe percentage of participants with at least one of the indicated polyp types found during standard colonoscopy compared to colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision.
Polyps Per ColonoscopyDuring the colonoscopy procedureNumber of adenomas or sessile serrated polyps found per colonoscopy of Standard colonoscopy compared to Colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision.
Boston Bowel Preparation ScoreDuring the withdrawal portion of the colonoscopy procedure after cleaning of the colonBoston Bowel Preparation Score for patients receiving standard colonoscopy compared to colonoscopy with endocuff vision. The total score for the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ranges from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating a better bowel preparation quality. The quality of the bowel preparation is assessed by the attending gastroenterologist.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Endocuff Vision
Colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision attached to distal end of scope Endocuff Vision: Subjects that are randomized to undergo their colonoscopy procedure with the Endocuff Vision device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure.
101
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)
Standard colonoscopy with no device attachments
99
Total200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalEndocuff VisionControl Arm (Standard Colonscopy)
Age, Continuous62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
62.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
61.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Gastroenterology fellows assisting in insertion32 Participants17 Participants15 Participants
Procedure Indication
Screening
97 Participants45 Participants52 Participants
Procedure Indication
Surveillance
103 Participants56 Participants47 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
21 Participants14 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
179 Participants87 Participants92 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
200 participants101 participants99 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
101 Participants44 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
99 Participants57 Participants42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 990 / 101
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 990 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 990 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Inspection Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)

Inspection time is time spent actually examining the colon. This was measured with a stopwatch and calculated by subtracting washing, suctioning, polypectomy and biopsy times from total withdrawal time. It was measured during colonoscopy by a study assistant using a stopwatch.

Time frame: During the withdrawal portion of the colonoscopy procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Endocuff VisionInspection Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)6.49 MinutesStandard Error 0.1
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)Inspection Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)8.42 MinutesStandard Error 0.12
Secondary

Boston Bowel Preparation Score

Boston Bowel Preparation Score for patients receiving standard colonoscopy compared to colonoscopy with endocuff vision. The total score for the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ranges from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating a better bowel preparation quality. The quality of the bowel preparation is assessed by the attending gastroenterologist.

Time frame: During the withdrawal portion of the colonoscopy procedure after cleaning of the colon

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Endocuff VisionBoston Bowel Preparation Score9 Scores on a scale
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)Boston Bowel Preparation Score9 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Detection Rates

The percentage of participants with at least one of the indicated polyp types found during standard colonoscopy compared to colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision.

Time frame: During the colonoscopy procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Endocuff VisionDetection RatesAdenomas61.4 Percentage of Participants
Endocuff VisionDetection RatesSessile serrated polyps19.8 Percentage of Participants
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)Detection RatesAdenomas52.5 Percentage of Participants
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)Detection RatesSessile serrated polyps11.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Insertion Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)

Insertion time is the time it takes from the colonoscope first being inserted to when the furthest section of the colon (which is called the cecum) is reached.

Time frame: During the insertion portion of the colonoscopy procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Endocuff VisionInsertion Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)4.05 MinutesStandard Error 0.16
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)Insertion Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)4.42 MinutesStandard Error 0.19
Secondary

Polyps Per Colonoscopy

Number of adenomas or sessile serrated polyps found per colonoscopy of Standard colonoscopy compared to Colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision.

Time frame: During the colonoscopy procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Endocuff VisionPolyps Per ColonoscopyAdenomas1.43 Polyps per colonoscopyStandard Error 1.79
Endocuff VisionPolyps Per ColonoscopySessile serrated polyps0.27 Polyps per colonoscopyStandard Error 0.63
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)Polyps Per ColonoscopyAdenomas1.07 Polyps per colonoscopyStandard Error 1.62
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)Polyps Per ColonoscopySessile serrated polyps0.21 Polyps per colonoscopyStandard Error 0.7
Secondary

Total Procedure Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)

Total procedure time is the time from the initial insertion through the complete withdrawal of the scope

Time frame: During the colonoscopy procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Endocuff VisionTotal Procedure Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)21.01 MinutesStandard Deviation 6.8
Control Arm (Standard Colonscopy)Total Procedure Time Comparisons for Each Method (Standard vs. Endocuff Vision)21.24 MinutesStandard Deviation 7.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026