Skip to content

Comparison of Bismuth Containing Quadruple Therapy and Based Tailored Therapy for H. Pylori Infection

Comparison of Bismuth Containing Quadruple Therapy and Clarithromycin Susceptibility-based Tailored Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori First-line Eradication

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03361267
Enrollment
300
Registered
2017-12-04
Start date
2017-12-30
Completion date
2018-06-28
Last updated
2017-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antibiotics, Compliance, Patient, Drug Resistance, Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Brief summary

As the antibiotic resistance increases, the eradication rate of triple therapy is decreasing. Recent guideline recommend the use of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in areas where clarithromycin resistance is greater than 15%. However, the ideal treatment would be the tailored therapy which choose the antibiotics depending on the antibiotic resistance. This study compared the eradication rates, safety and complicance of tailored therapy compared with empirical bismuth quadruple therapy in the naive patients with H. pylori infection.

Detailed description

In order to be eligible for first-line H. pylori eradication therapy, at least 80% of eradication rate should be achieved by intention to treat (ITT) analysis. However, the triple therapy (PPI, clarithromycin, amoxicillin) is losing 1st-line therapy because of increasing antibiotic resistance. The most common cause of failure in triple therapy is clarithromycin resistance. In the past, clarithromycin resistance was rarely observed in Korea, but the resistance rate has increased rapidly during the last 10 years, up to 37.3%. As an alternative, Korean guidelines of Helicobacter pylori eradication in 2013 recommend that bismuth-containing antibiotics (not containing clarithromycin) should be considered in areas with high clarithromycin resistance as in Korea. However, there is a lack of research on the efficacy of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as a 1st-line therapy. The aim of this prospectivce randomized study is to investingate the efficacy, conpliance, adverse events and cost-effectiveness between bismuth containing quadruple therapy and tailored therapy in areas with high clarithromycin resistance

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHelicobacter pylori PCR test

Clarithromycin resistance (-) Triple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1000mg bid, clarithromycin 500mg bid) for 7 days Clarithromycin resistance (+) Bismuth containing quadruple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, bismuth 300 mg qid, tetracycline 500mg qid) for 7 days

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCLO test

CLO test : negative --\> drop out CLO test : postive --\> bismuth containing quadruple therapy

Sponsors

Inha University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with peptic ulcer, s/p ESD due to early gastric cancer/gastric adenoma, Maltoma * Ability and willingness to participate in the study and to sign and give informed consent * confirmed H. pylori infection

Exclusion criteria

* Previous H. pylori eradication therapy * Less than 18 years old * With history of H. pylori infection treatment * With previous gastric surgery * Major systemic diseases * Pregnancy or lactation * Allergy to any of the study drugs * Administration of antibiotics, bismuth, antisecretory drugs in 8 weeks prior to inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Helicobacter pylori eradication rateSix weeks after completion of therapySix weeks after completion of therapy, H. pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³C-urea breath test or CLO test. Eradication was defined as negative result from urea breath test (\<4‰) (4‰ as the cutoff value). or negative from CLO test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of adverse effectswithin 7 days after completion of therapyDuring the 7-day treatment period, the subjects kept a diary to score any possible side effects or discomforts. The subjects were asked to grade the severity of adverse events according to their influence on daily activities, experienced as mild (transient and well tolerated), moderate (causing discomfort and partially interfering with daily activities), or severe (causing considerable interference with daily activities).
Compliance ratewithin 7 days after completion of therapyCompliance was defined as poor when they had taken less than 80% of the total medication.
Medical costtwo months after completion of therapy ]Summation of diagnostic fee, cost of medication and 2-line therapy cost if the 1st line therapy fails

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactByoung Wook Bang, M.D. phD
bangbu@inha.ac.kr+82-32-890-2548
Backup ContactHyung Kil Kim, M.D. phD
kimhg@inha.ac.kr+82-32-890-2548

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026