Skip to content

PEMF and PEC Blocks in Mastectomy Reconstruction Patients

A Comparison of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) and Pectoral (PEC) Interfascial Blocks on Postoperative Pain Reduction in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Tissue Expander Reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03360214
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-12-04
Start date
2017-07-05
Completion date
2022-03-07
Last updated
2025-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Female

Keywords

Mastectomy, Tissue expander, PEMF, PIB

Brief summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled double-blind interventional study comparing the effect of pulsed-electromagnetic field device (PEMF), pectoral interfascial block (PIB), and placebo on postoperative pain control. This study has the interdisciplinary cooperation of the regional anesthesia group, and the breast and plastic surgery divisions. All female patients with breast cancer evaluated at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) who are undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with tissue expander reconstruction will be offered enrollment in this prospective study.

Detailed description

Chronic pain after mastectomy, or breast tissue removal, is very common with almost half of women experiencing some type of residual pain and even 13% characterizing it as severe. Poor acute postoperative pain control is not only associated with development of chronic pain, but has also been shown to be associated with delayed wound healing. Therefore, optimization of postoperative pain control is paramount not just for patient comfort, but to decrease immediate and long-term postoperative complications. There are two adjunctive modes of perioperative pain control currently in use at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). The first mode uses pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) and consists of a noninvasive device placed over dressings around the surgical site. The second is a regional anesthetic and -the pectoral interfascial block (PIB) in which a long-lasting local anesthetic (bupivacaine/ropivacaine) is injected into the surgical dissection area. Both of these techniques for postoperative analgesia have been shown to be effective in different types of breast surgery, but there is no current literature comparing the two modalities in their efficacy in reducing postoperative pain. There is also no current literature in their efficacy in the mastectomy and tissue expander patient population. The proposed trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of these two modalities of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing mastectomy and tissue expander reconstruction.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine Hydrochloride

For active drug, 0.25% marcaine, will be used.

OTHERPlacebo Drug

For sham drug, 0.9% saline, will be used.

The pulsed electromagnetic field signal will consist of a 2-m sec burst of 27.12 megahertz (MHz) radiofrequency sinusoidal waves repeating at 2 bursts/second.

OTHERPlacebo Device

Sham devices will appear identical to and will be used in exactly the same manner as active devices but will produce no electromagnetic field.

For active drug, 0.25% naropin, will be used.

Sponsors

Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must be female * Subjects must be 18 years or older * Subjects must be undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with tissue expander reconstruction

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to all narcotic medications * Intake of any chronic opioids or pain medications preoperatively for a chronic condition or chronic use.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention1 hour post-interventionPain level will be measured using the VAS scale. Subjects will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10. Number 0 indicates no pain and number 10 indicates terrible pain.
Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention3 weeks post-interventionPain level will be measured using the VAS scale. Subjects will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10. Number 0 indicates no pain and number 10 indicates terrible pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 1 Hour Post-intervention1 hour post-interventionQuality of recovery will be measured using QoR. QoR is a 15-item self-reported questionnaire, with each response on a scale of 0-10 pertaining to patient's comfort, support system, pain, well being, and ability to carry out daily activities. The total score range is 0 to 150, with a higher score indicating a better quality of recovery.
Quality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention3 weeks post-interventionQuality of recovery will be measured using QoR. QoR is a 15-item self-reported questionnaire, with each response on a scale of 0-10 pertaining to patient's comfort, support system, pain, well being, and ability to carry out daily activities. The total score range is 0 to 150, with a higher score indicating a better quality of recovery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active PEMF + Treatment PIB
Participants will receive an active device (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device) and active drug: 0.25% Bupivacaine Hydrochloride or 0.25% Ropivacaine HCl.
15
Active PEMF + Sham PIB
Participants will receive an active device (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device) and placebo drug: 0.9% saline.
15
Sham PEMF + Treatment PIB
Participants will receive a placebo device (identical appearance to active device, but produces no electromagnetic field) and active drug: 0.25% Bupivacaine Hydrochloride.
15
Sham PEMF + Sham PIB
Participants will receive placebo drug and placebo device.
15
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive PEMF + Treatment PIBTotalSham PEMF + Sham PIBSham PEMF + Treatment PIBActive PEMF + Sham PIB
Age, Continuous50 years50 years53 years48 years53 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants23 Participants7 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants37 Participants8 Participants10 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants8 Participants3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants18 Participants6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants31 Participants4 Participants8 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants15 participants15 participants15 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants60 Participants15 Participants15 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 10 / 150 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 10 / 150 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 10 / 150 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention

Pain level will be measured using the VAS scale. Subjects will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10. Number 0 indicates no pain and number 10 indicates terrible pain.

Time frame: 1 hour post-intervention

Population: 4 participants declined to do the VAS assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PEMF + Treatment PIBScore on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention6.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Active PEMF + Sham PIBScore on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention6.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Sham PEMF + Treatment PIBScore on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention4.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.57
Sham PEMF + Sham PIBScore on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention6.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Primary

Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention

Pain level will be measured using the VAS scale. Subjects will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10. Number 0 indicates no pain and number 10 indicates terrible pain.

Time frame: 3 weeks post-intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PEMF + Treatment PIBScore on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention2.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Active PEMF + Sham PIBScore on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention2.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Sham PEMF + Treatment PIBScore on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention2.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Sham PEMF + Sham PIBScore on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Secondary

Quality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 1 Hour Post-intervention

Quality of recovery will be measured using QoR. QoR is a 15-item self-reported questionnaire, with each response on a scale of 0-10 pertaining to patient's comfort, support system, pain, well being, and ability to carry out daily activities. The total score range is 0 to 150, with a higher score indicating a better quality of recovery.

Time frame: 1 hour post-intervention

Population: Some participants in each arm declined to do the QoR assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PEMF + Treatment PIBQuality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 1 Hour Post-intervention82.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.67
Active PEMF + Sham PIBQuality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 1 Hour Post-intervention90.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.14
Sham PEMF + Treatment PIBQuality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 1 Hour Post-intervention82.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.24
Sham PEMF + Sham PIBQuality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 1 Hour Post-intervention77.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.84
Secondary

Quality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention

Quality of recovery will be measured using QoR. QoR is a 15-item self-reported questionnaire, with each response on a scale of 0-10 pertaining to patient's comfort, support system, pain, well being, and ability to carry out daily activities. The total score range is 0 to 150, with a higher score indicating a better quality of recovery.

Time frame: 3 weeks post-intervention

Population: 1 participant declined to do the QoR assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PEMF + Treatment PIBQuality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention122 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.79
Active PEMF + Sham PIBQuality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention123.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.77
Sham PEMF + Treatment PIBQuality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention125.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.29
Sham PEMF + Sham PIBQuality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention121 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.92

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026