Skip to content

Comparison of New Contact Lens With Current Marketed Lens

Clinical Validation Study of Phoebe Lens

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03360110
Enrollment
53
Registered
2017-12-02
Start date
2017-11-06
Completion date
2017-12-15
Last updated
2020-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to validate the clinical performance of a new contact lens design.

Detailed description

Evaluate the clinical performance of its Phoebe contact lenses (Test) compared to the commercially available MyDay contact lenses (Control).

Interventions

DEVICEPhoebe test lens

Daily disposable contact lens

Daily disposable contact lens

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Double masked (participant, investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she: * Between and 18 and 35 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer * Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years * Has read and understood the information consent letter * Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule * Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/25 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction or 20/20 best corrected * Has a Contact Lens Refraction between -1.00D and -6.00D * Cylinder power ≤ -0.75DC in Spherical Cylindrical Refraction * Currently wears soft contact lenses * Is willing to wear lenses for a minimal of 8 hours a day and everyday during the course of the study * Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease * Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the first visit

Exclusion criteria

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she: * Has never worn contact lenses before * Is wearing Monovision modality * Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health * Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health * Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses * Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye * Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, active neovascularization or any central corneal scars * Is aphakic * Has undergone corneal refractive surgery * Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Palpebral Roughness Grade - Lower LidBaselineMeasurement of smoothness of palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=smooth, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps
Palpebral Hyperemia on Upper LidBaselineMeasurement of hyperemia of the palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=none, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps
Palpebral Hyperemia on Lower LidBaselineMeasurement of hyperemia of the palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=none, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps
Palpebral Roughness Grade - Upper LidBaselineMeasurement of smoothness of palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=smooth, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps
Corneal Staining ExtentBaselineMeasurement of extent of corneal staining using Fluorescein, blue light, yellow filter, full beam, medium magnification on a scale 0-4 (0=no staining, 1 = 1-15% of area, 2= 16-30% of area, 3=31-45% of area, 4=\>45% of area).
Conjunctival Staining ScoreBaselineAmount of staining observed on the conjunctiva scored 0-4 (0=none, 4=Deep Confluent, in 0.50 steps

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Near Visual AcuityBaseline (at dispense)Near visual acuity recorded in logMAR
Vision Quality RatingBaseline (at dispense)Subjective vision quality rated on a 0-10 scale (0=extremely poor, 10=excellent)
Distance Visual AcuityBaseline (at lens dispense)Distance visual acuity recorded in logMAR.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Subjects randomized to wear pair of test/control lens either first or second, then wear other lens. Phoebe test lens: Daily disposable contact lens stenfilcon A lens (control): Daily disposable contact lens
47
Total47

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
47 Participants
Age, Continuous23 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
47 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
47 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 530 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 530 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 530 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Conjunctival Staining Score

Amount of staining observed on the conjunctiva scored 0-4 (0=none, 4=Deep Confluent, in 0.50 steps

Time frame: Baseline

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensConjunctival Staining Score0.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Stenfilcon A Control LensConjunctival Staining Score0.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Primary

Conjunctival Staining Score

Amount of staining observed on the conjunctiva scored 0-4 (0=none, 4=Deep Confluent, in 0.50 steps

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensConjunctival Staining Score0.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Stenfilcon A Control LensConjunctival Staining Score0.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Primary

Corneal Staining Extent

Measurement of extent of corneal staining using Fluorescein, blue light, yellow filter, full beam, medium magnification on a scale 0-4 (0=no staining, 1 = 1-15% of area, 2= 16-30% of area, 3=31-45% of area, 4=\>45% of area).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensCorneal Staining Extent0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Stenfilcon A Control LensCorneal Staining Extent0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Primary

Corneal Staining Extent

Measurement of extent of corneal staining using Fluorescein, blue light, yellow filter, full beam, medium magnification on a scale 0-4 (0=no staining, 1 = 1-15% of area, 2= 16-30% of area, 3=31-45% of area, 4=\>45% of area).

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensCorneal Staining Extent0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Stenfilcon A Control LensCorneal Staining Extent0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12
Primary

Palpebral Hyperemia on Lower Lid

Measurement of hyperemia of the palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=none, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensPalpebral Hyperemia on Lower Lid1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Stenfilcon A Control LensPalpebral Hyperemia on Lower Lid1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Primary

Palpebral Hyperemia on Lower Lid

Measurement of hyperemia of the palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=none, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps

Time frame: Baseline

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensPalpebral Hyperemia on Lower Lid0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Stenfilcon A Control LensPalpebral Hyperemia on Lower Lid0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Primary

Palpebral Hyperemia on Upper Lid

Measurement of hyperemia of the palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=none, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensPalpebral Hyperemia on Upper Lid1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Stenfilcon A Control LensPalpebral Hyperemia on Upper Lid1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Primary

Palpebral Hyperemia on Upper Lid

Measurement of hyperemia of the palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=none, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps

Time frame: Baseline

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensPalpebral Hyperemia on Upper Lid0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Stenfilcon A Control LensPalpebral Hyperemia on Upper Lid0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Primary

Palpebral Roughness Grade - Lower Lid

Measurement of smoothness of palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=smooth, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps

Time frame: Baseline

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensPalpebral Roughness Grade - Lower Lid1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Stenfilcon A Control LensPalpebral Roughness Grade - Lower Lid1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Primary

Palpebral Roughness Grade - Lower Lid

Measurement of smoothness of palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=smooth, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensPalpebral Roughness Grade - Lower Lid1.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Stenfilcon A Control LensPalpebral Roughness Grade - Lower Lid1.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Primary

Palpebral Roughness Grade - Upper Lid

Measurement of smoothness of palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=smooth, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensPalpebral Roughness Grade - Upper Lid1.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Stenfilcon A Control LensPalpebral Roughness Grade - Upper Lid1.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Primary

Palpebral Roughness Grade - Upper Lid

Measurement of smoothness of palpebral conjunctiva; graded 0-4 (0=smooth, 4=severe) in 0.25 steps

Time frame: Baseline

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensPalpebral Roughness Grade - Upper Lid1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Stenfilcon A Control LensPalpebral Roughness Grade - Upper Lid1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Secondary

Distance Visual Acuity

Distance visual acuity recorded in logMAR.

Time frame: Baseline (at lens dispense)

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensDistance Visual AcuityHigh Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.23 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.06
Phoebe Test LensDistance Visual AcuityLow Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.03 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.08
Stenfilcon A Control LensDistance Visual AcuityHigh Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.22 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.06
Stenfilcon A Control LensDistance Visual AcuityLow Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.03 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Distance Visual Acuity

Distance visual acuity recorded in logMAR.

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensDistance Visual AcuityHigh Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.23 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.06
Phoebe Test LensDistance Visual AcuityLow Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.04 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.06
Stenfilcon A Control LensDistance Visual AcuityHigh Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.22 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.06
Stenfilcon A Control LensDistance Visual AcuityLow Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.04 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Near Visual Acuity

Near visual acuity recorded in logMAR

Time frame: Baseline (at dispense)

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensNear Visual AcuityHigh Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.16 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.07
Phoebe Test LensNear Visual AcuityLow Illumination High Contrast, Binocular0.09 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.1
Stenfilcon A Control LensNear Visual AcuityHigh Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.16 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.06
Stenfilcon A Control LensNear Visual AcuityLow Illumination High Contrast, Binocular0.06 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Near Visual Acuity

Near visual acuity recorded in logMAR

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensNear Visual AcuityHigh Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.17 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.07
Phoebe Test LensNear Visual AcuityLow Illumination High Contrast, Binocular0.06 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.09
Stenfilcon A Control LensNear Visual AcuityHigh Illumination High Contrast, Binocular-0.19 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.07
Stenfilcon A Control LensNear Visual AcuityLow Illumination High Contrast, Binocular0.04 Log(MAR)Standard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Vision Quality Rating

Subjective vision quality rated on a 0-10 scale (0=extremely poor, 10=excellent)

Time frame: Baseline (at dispense)

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensVision Quality Rating9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Stenfilcon A Control LensVision Quality Rating9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Vision Quality Rating

Subjective vision quality rated on a 0-10 scale (0=extremely poor, 10=excellent)

Time frame: Day 3

Population: There were 6 protocol deviations reported in this study and data from the 6 subjects were not used for data analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phoebe Test LensVision Quality Rating9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Stenfilcon A Control LensVision Quality Rating9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026