Skip to content

Comparing Measurements Made in an Incremental Shuttle Walk Test and a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Patients With IPF

A Comparative Assessment of Measurements Made in an Incremental Shuttle Walk Test and Incremental Cycle Ergometry Test in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03360032
Enrollment
43
Registered
2017-12-02
Start date
2018-01-10
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2019-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

Incremental shuttle walk test, Cardiopulmonary exercise test, VO2 peak

Brief summary

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and potentially fatal lung disease. As IPF progresses, patients become increasingly breathless with reduced exercise capacity and quality of life. A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is a gold standard way of assessing patients with IPF. An incremental shuttle walk test is simpler, cheaper, more widely available and anecdotally preferable to CPET. The investigators will compare the measurements made in an ISWT and a CPET in patients with IPF . We aim to determine whether sufficient information can be gathered in an ISWT to negate the need to undertake CPET.

Detailed description

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and potentially fatal lung disease. As IPF progresses, patients become increasingly breathless with reduced exercise capacity and quality of life. Average life expectancy is three years from diagnosis but IPF progresses at different rates in different people. In 2012 the British Lung Foundation estimated that 32,500 in the UK had IPF. An accurate prognosis can help determine the most appropriate individual treatment option and allow patients and their families to make suitable plans. Currently, measurements from resting lung function tests are used to predict prognosis. However, measurement made during CPET are more sensitive survival predictors and CPET is the gold standard test to assess prognosis in IPF. A CPET test is relatively time-consuming and requires specialist equipment that is not universally available. CPET is not routinely used in clinical practice for the assessment of IPF. The incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) is quicker, cheaper and more widely available than CPET. This study builds on previous research done by the Respiratory team which showed a linear relationship between the distance walked in an ISWT and peak oxygen consumption during a CPET, a useful prognostic predictor, in patients with interstitial lung disease. 40-50 patients with IPF will be recruited and will undertake both ISWT and CPET at University Hospital, Coventry. The investigators will compare the results in the current cohort to those of the previous study. Additionally, the research team will compare oxygen pressure in capillary blood at the end of an ISWT and a CPET. The investigators will also compare patient experience of the two tests using questionnaires. This study paves the way for a simple, standardised test to more accurately predict prognosis in IPF.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis confirmed by a multi-disciplinary team. * Aged 16 or over * Able to give informed consent to take part * Able to undertake both a cycle ergometry test and an incremental shuttle walk test without needing walking aids

Exclusion criteria

* An inability to give informed consent. * Taking part in a research project with a potentially research-modifying intervention * Currently pregnant. * Currently breastfeeding. * Unable to perform an incremental shuttle walk test. * Unable to perform an incremental cycle ergometry test. * Unable to walk without an aid such as a stick or frame.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VO2 peakMeasured and reported at time of testMaximum oxygen consumption at peak exercise

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PO2Measured and reported at time of testOxygen pressure in capillary blood at peak exercise

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactDavid Parr
david.parr@uhcw.nhs.uk02476 967697

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026