Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Multiple Oral Doses of Luvadaxistat in Adults With Schizophrenia

A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Study to Evaluate Pharmacodynamic Effects, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Oral Doses of TAK-831 in Adult Subjects With Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03359785
Enrollment
31
Registered
2017-12-02
Start date
2018-01-10
Completion date
2020-12-21
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Drug therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether luvadaxistat is superior to placebo in improving cerebellar function as measured with the average percentage of conditioned responses during the eyeblink conditioning (EBC) test.

Detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called luvadaxistat. Luvadaxistat is being tested to treat people with schizophrenia. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment sequences which will remain undisclosed to the participant and study doctor during the study (unless there is an urgent medical need): * Luvadaxistat 500 milligrams (mg) followed by matching placebo * Matching placebo followed by luvadaxistat 50 mg Participants will receive luvadaxistat 500 mg during the treatment period in which they are assigned to luvadaxistat. Following an interim analysis, there will be a study-wide decision about whether to treat the additional participants with luvadaxistat 500 mg during the active treatment period to or treat them with luvadaxistat 50 mg during this period. After the interim analysis, the participant and study doctor will not be aware of which luvadaxistat dose is being used.

Interventions

TAK-831 Tablets.

DRUGMatching Placebo

Matching Placebo Tablets.

Sponsors

Takeda
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Neurocrine Biosciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to (\>=) 18.5 and less than or equal to (\<=) 40.0 (kilogram per square meter \[kg/m\^2\]) at the Screening Visit. * With a current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of schizophrenia who are receiving stable antipsychotic therapy (no increase, no decrease greater than \[\>\] 20% in dose in the preceding 2 months). * Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative symptom factor score (NSFS) \>= 15, stable screening and baseline PANSS NSFS (\< 25% change). * PANSS total score \<= 90; stable screening and baseline PANSS total score (less than \[\<\] 20% change). * Receiving stable (no increase, no decrease \> 25% in dose in the preceding 2 months)antipsychotic medication at doses not to exceed risperidone 6 mg or its equivalent. Concomitant treatment with a subtherapeutic dose of a second antipsychotic may be permitted with sponsor or designee approval if used as a hypnotic (maximum of quetiapine 300 mg or its equivalent once daily at bedtime) and participants does not show morning sedation as per the investigator opinion, but not if it is used for refractory positive psychosis symptoms. Under this exception, the total daily dose the second antipsychotic will not have to be included in the calculation of the 6 mg/day risperidone-equivalent limit.

Exclusion criteria

* Has a history of cancer (malignancy) excluding treated basal cell carcinoma or treated stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma. * Has a history of significant multiple and/or severe allergies (example \[eg\], food, drug, latex allergy) or has had an anaphylactic reaction or significant intolerability to prescription or nonprescription drugs or food. * Has a QT interval with Fridericia's correction method (QTcF) \> 450 milliseconds \[ms\] (males) or \> 470 ms (females) confirmed with one repeat testing, at the Screening Visit or Check-in. * Has a positive alcohol or drug screen for disallowed substances, including amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine, marijuana, methadone, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, phencyclidine, or nonprescribed benzodiazepines or opiates. * Is positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C antibodies, or has HIV by history (confirmatory testing is allowed; most sensitive test should take precedence). * Had major surgery, donated or lost 250 milliliter \[mL\] of blood within 4 weeks prior to the prestudy (screening) visit. * Has a known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation of luvadaxistat. * Has a history of significant skin reactions (hypersensitivity) to adhesives, metals or plastic. * Is considered by the investigator to be at imminent risk of suicide or injury to self, others, or property, or participants who within the past year prior to Screening have attempted suicide. Participants who have positive answers on item 4 or 5 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (based on the past year) prior to randomization are excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Average Percent of Conditioned Responses During the Eye Blink Conditioning (EBC) Test at Day 8Baseline, Day 8 of each treatment periodEBC is a method used to investigate cerebellar-dependent learning. In EBC, a conditioned stimulus, a tone precedes but co-terminates with an unconditioned stimulus, an airpuff to the eyelid. Learning is demonstrated when an eyeblink (the conditioned response) occurs prior to the onset of the unconditioned stimulus. The percentage can range from 0% (no conditioned learning has occurred) to 100% (all responses are conditioned). Results are reported as least squares (LS) means at Day 8, determined using an analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Mean P300 Amplitude at Day 8Baseline, Day 8 of each treatment periodThe P300 wave is an ERP component that is elicited by the presentation of a novel, behaviorally relevant target stimulus embedded among irrelevant stimuli in a manner similar to MMN but requiring active listening and responding from participants. Auditory stimuli are presented in an oddball paradigm consisting of 1 standard tone and 1 target tone. Participants are instructed to push a button as quickly as possible when they hear the target tone but not when they hear the standard tone. P300 reflects allocation of attention and activation of immediate memory. P300 amplitude was measured at midline parietal electrode (Pz) of EEG. Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to the dose of study treatment in the corresponding period. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using an ANOVA.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) at Day 8Baseline, Day 8 of each treatment periodASSRs are evoked oscillatory responses that are entrained to the frequency and phase of temporally modulated stimuli. Individuals with schizophrenia experience subjective sensory anomalies and objective deficits on assessment of sensory function. These deficits can be produced by abnormal signaling in the sensory pathways and sensory cortex or by later-stage disturbances in the cognitive processing of such inputs. ASSR can be used to assess the integrity of sensory pathways including cortical processing. The ASSR applied a frequency stimulus of 40 hertz (Hz) and was measured at midline central electrode (Cz) of EEG. Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to the dose of study treatment in the corresponding period. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using an ANOVA.
Change From Baseline on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Composite Score at Day 7Baseline, Day 7 of each treatment periodBACS is a cognition assessment battery and includes brief assessments of reasoning and problem solving, verbal fluency, attention, verbal memory, working memory and motor speed. The primary measure from each test is standardized by creating z-scores whereby the mean of the test session of a healthy person is set to 0 and the standard deviation set to 1. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean. A composite score was calculated by averaging the 4 measures from the BACS used in the study and then calculating a z-score of the composite. The composite z-score indicates how much higher or lower the participants cognition is compared to a healthy person. Lower z-scores are indicative of lower cognitive performance. Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to the dose of study treatment in the corresponding period. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 7, determined using an ANOVA.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Mismatch Negativity (MMN) at Day 8Baseline, Day 8 of each treatment periodMMN is an event related potential (ERP) evoked in response to unattended changes in background stimulation. MMN reflects an automatic process of detecting a mismatch between a deviant stimulus and a sensory-memory trace. Smaller amplitudes of MMN have been consistently identified in schizophrenia participants. MMN amplitude was measured at midline frontal electrode (Fz) of electroencephalogram (EEG). Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to the dose of study treatment in the corresponding period. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using an ANOVA.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma D-serine to Total Serine Ratio at Day 8Baseline and Day 8 of each treatment periodBlood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and plasma concentrations of D-serine and total serine were measured. Plasma D-serine to total serine ratios were then calculated. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using a MMRM.
Mean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 1 0.25 to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours post-dose, Day 7 pre-dose, 0.25 to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours post-dose, and Day 8 pre-doseBlood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and plasma concentrations of luvadaxistat were measured.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8Day 1 and at multiple time points (up to 6 hours) to Day 8 pre-doseBlood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and plasma concentrations of D-serine and L-serine were measured. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 1 investigative site in the United States from 10 January 2018 to 21 December 2020.

Pre-assignment details

This 2-period cross-over study assessed the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple oral doses of luvadaxistat given once daily (QD) in adult participants with schizophrenia. Effects of 2 dose levels of luvadaxistat (500 milligrams \[mg\] and 50 mg) or placebo were assessed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Luvadaxistat 500 mg, Then Placebo
Participants first received luvadaxistat 500 mg orally QD for 8 days during treatment period 1. After a washout of 14 to 21 days, participants then received matching placebo orally QD for 8 days during treatment period 2.
8
Placebo, Then Luvadaxistat 500 mg
Participants first received matching placebo orally QD for 8 days during treatment period 1. After a washout of 14 to 21 days, participants then received luvadaxistat 500 mg orally QD for 8 days during treatment period 2.
9
Luvadaxistat 50 mg, Then Placebo
Participants first received luvadaxistat 50 mg orally QD for 8 days during treatment period 1. After a washout of 14 to 21 days, participants then received matching placebo orally QD for 8 days during treatment period 2.
7
Placebo, Then Luvadaxistat 50 mg
Participants first received matching placebo orally QD for 8 days during treatment period 1. After a washout of 14 to 21 days, participants then received luvadaxistat 50 mg orally QD for 8 days during treatment period 2.
7
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyEarly study termination due to study pause0020
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLuvadaxistat 500 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then Luvadaxistat 500 mgLuvadaxistat 50 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then Luvadaxistat 50 mgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants9 Participants7 Participants7 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants9 Participants6 Participants7 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants8 Participants6 Participants4 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants7 Participants6 Participants5 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 150 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 151 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 150 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Average Percent of Conditioned Responses During the Eye Blink Conditioning (EBC) Test at Day 8

EBC is a method used to investigate cerebellar-dependent learning. In EBC, a conditioned stimulus, a tone precedes but co-terminates with an unconditioned stimulus, an airpuff to the eyelid. Learning is demonstrated when an eyeblink (the conditioned response) occurs prior to the onset of the unconditioned stimulus. The percentage can range from 0% (no conditioned learning has occurred) to 100% (all responses are conditioned). Results are reported as least squares (LS) means at Day 8, determined using an analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 8 of each treatment period

Population: The PD set consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 post- dose PD result. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Luvadaxistat 50 mgChange From Baseline in Average Percent of Conditioned Responses During the Eye Blink Conditioning (EBC) Test at Day 80.597 Percent of Conditioned ResponsesStandard Error 0.459
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Change From Baseline in Average Percent of Conditioned Responses During the Eye Blink Conditioning (EBC) Test at Day 80.319 Percent of Conditioned ResponsesStandard Error 0.432
Luvadaxistat 500 mgChange From Baseline in Average Percent of Conditioned Responses During the Eye Blink Conditioning (EBC) Test at Day 80.578 Percent of Conditioned ResponsesStandard Error 0.444
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 500 mg)Change From Baseline in Average Percent of Conditioned Responses During the Eye Blink Conditioning (EBC) Test at Day 81.344 Percent of Conditioned ResponsesStandard Error 0.428
p-value: 0.2401ANOVA
p-value: 0.9053ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) at Day 8

ASSRs are evoked oscillatory responses that are entrained to the frequency and phase of temporally modulated stimuli. Individuals with schizophrenia experience subjective sensory anomalies and objective deficits on assessment of sensory function. These deficits can be produced by abnormal signaling in the sensory pathways and sensory cortex or by later-stage disturbances in the cognitive processing of such inputs. ASSR can be used to assess the integrity of sensory pathways including cortical processing. The ASSR applied a frequency stimulus of 40 hertz (Hz) and was measured at midline central electrode (Cz) of EEG. Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to the dose of study treatment in the corresponding period. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using an ANOVA.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 8 of each treatment period

Population: The PD set consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 post- dose PD result. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Luvadaxistat 50 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) at Day 82.135 microvolts-squaredStandard Error 8.83
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) at Day 8-16.282 microvolts-squaredStandard Error 9.31
Luvadaxistat 500 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) at Day 89.411 microvolts-squaredStandard Error 20.4
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 500 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) at Day 89.203 microvolts-squaredStandard Error 20.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Mismatch Negativity (MMN) at Day 8

MMN is an event related potential (ERP) evoked in response to unattended changes in background stimulation. MMN reflects an automatic process of detecting a mismatch between a deviant stimulus and a sensory-memory trace. Smaller amplitudes of MMN have been consistently identified in schizophrenia participants. MMN amplitude was measured at midline frontal electrode (Fz) of electroencephalogram (EEG). Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to the dose of study treatment in the corresponding period. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using an ANOVA.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 8 of each treatment period

Population: The PD set consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 post- dose PD result. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Luvadaxistat 50 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Mismatch Negativity (MMN) at Day 8-0.239 microvoltsStandard Error 0.363
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Mismatch Negativity (MMN) at Day 80.669 microvoltsStandard Error 0.382
Luvadaxistat 500 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Mismatch Negativity (MMN) at Day 80.594 microvoltsStandard Error 0.492
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 500 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Mismatch Negativity (MMN) at Day 8-0.154 microvoltsStandard Error 0.501
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean P300 Amplitude at Day 8

The P300 wave is an ERP component that is elicited by the presentation of a novel, behaviorally relevant target stimulus embedded among irrelevant stimuli in a manner similar to MMN but requiring active listening and responding from participants. Auditory stimuli are presented in an oddball paradigm consisting of 1 standard tone and 1 target tone. Participants are instructed to push a button as quickly as possible when they hear the target tone but not when they hear the standard tone. P300 reflects allocation of attention and activation of immediate memory. P300 amplitude was measured at midline parietal electrode (Pz) of EEG. Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to the dose of study treatment in the corresponding period. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using an ANOVA.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 8 of each treatment period

Population: The PD set consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 post- dose PD result. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Luvadaxistat 50 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean P300 Amplitude at Day 8-2.019 microvoltsStandard Error 1.68
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean P300 Amplitude at Day 80.608 microvoltsStandard Error 1.68
Luvadaxistat 500 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean P300 Amplitude at Day 81.102 microvoltsStandard Error 1.77
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 500 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean P300 Amplitude at Day 82.595 microvoltsStandard Error 1.86
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and plasma concentrations of D-serine and L-serine were measured. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Day 1 and at multiple time points (up to 6 hours) to Day 8 pre-dose

Population: The PK analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and who had any available plasma concentration data. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Luvadaxistat 50 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8D-serine0.0402 mg / literStandard Error 0.00632
Luvadaxistat 50 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8L-serine0.669 mg / literStandard Error 0.479
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8L-serine-0.543 mg / literStandard Error 0.483
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8D-serine-0.000892 mg / literStandard Error 0.00637
Luvadaxistat 500 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8D-serine0.0398 mg / literStandard Error 0.0071
Luvadaxistat 500 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8L-serine-1.09 mg / literStandard Error 0.514
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 500 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8D-serine0.00212 mg / literStandard Error 0.00712
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 500 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma Concentrations of D-serine and L-serine at Day 8L-serine-0.304 mg / literStandard Error 0.516
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma D-serine to Total Serine Ratio at Day 8

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and plasma concentrations of D-serine and total serine were measured. Plasma D-serine to total serine ratios were then calculated. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 8, determined using a MMRM.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 8 of each treatment period

Population: The PK analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and who had any available plasma concentration data. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Luvadaxistat 50 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Plasma D-serine to Total Serine Ratio at Day 80.00293 ratioStandard Error 0.000855
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma D-serine to Total Serine Ratio at Day 80.000590 ratioStandard Error 0.000863
Luvadaxistat 500 mgChange From Baseline in the Mean Plasma D-serine to Total Serine Ratio at Day 80.00561 ratioStandard Error 0.000994
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 500 mg)Change From Baseline in the Mean Plasma D-serine to Total Serine Ratio at Day 80.000620 ratioStandard Error 0.000997
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Composite Score at Day 7

BACS is a cognition assessment battery and includes brief assessments of reasoning and problem solving, verbal fluency, attention, verbal memory, working memory and motor speed. The primary measure from each test is standardized by creating z-scores whereby the mean of the test session of a healthy person is set to 0 and the standard deviation set to 1. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean. A composite score was calculated by averaging the 4 measures from the BACS used in the study and then calculating a z-score of the composite. The composite z-score indicates how much higher or lower the participants cognition is compared to a healthy person. Lower z-scores are indicative of lower cognitive performance. Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to the dose of study treatment in the corresponding period. Results are reported as LS mean change from baseline at Day 7, determined using an ANOVA.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 7 of each treatment period

Population: The PD set consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 post- dose PD result. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Luvadaxistat 50 mgChange From Baseline on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Composite Score at Day 72.574 z-scoreStandard Error 2.51
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Change From Baseline on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Composite Score at Day 75.070 z-scoreStandard Error 2.55
Luvadaxistat 500 mgChange From Baseline on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Composite Score at Day 75.696 z-scoreStandard Error 1.41
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 500 mg)Change From Baseline on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Composite Score at Day 7-0.075 z-scoreStandard Error 1.43
Secondary

Mean Plasma Concentration of Luvadaxistat

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and plasma concentrations of luvadaxistat were measured.

Time frame: Day 1 0.25 to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours post-dose, Day 7 pre-dose, 0.25 to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours post-dose, and Day 8 pre-dose

Population: The PK analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and who had any available plasma concentration data. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luvadaxistat 50 mgMean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 1 - Post-dose (0.25 to 2 hours)253.4 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 199.3
Luvadaxistat 50 mgMean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 1 - Post-dose (3 to 6 hours)47.66 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 35.64
Luvadaxistat 50 mgMean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 7 - Pre-dose8.749 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 19.212
Luvadaxistat 50 mgMean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 7 - Post-dose (0.25 to 2 hours)203.5 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 199.6
Luvadaxistat 50 mgMean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 7 - Post-dose (3 to 6 hours)38.94 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 26.23
Luvadaxistat 50 mgMean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 8 - Pre-dose3.366 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 2.726
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Mean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 7 - Post-dose (3 to 6 hours)301.5 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 177.2
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Mean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 1 - Post-dose (0.25 to 2 hours)700.4 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 783
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Mean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 7 - Post-dose (0.25 to 2 hours)1184 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 482
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Mean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 1 - Post-dose (3 to 6 hours)671.1 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 473.1
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Mean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 8 - Pre-dose21.61 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 14.65
Placebo (Reference for Luvadaxistat 50 mg)Mean Plasma Concentration of LuvadaxistatDay 7 - Pre-dose78.92 nanograms / milliliterStandard Deviation 229.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026