Histological Response, Sensitivity, Specificity, Survival
Conditions
Keywords
CESOFB, clinical evaluation, RECIST, histological response, survival, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma
Brief summary
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are insensitive in evaluating primary sarcoma originated from bone treated with chemotherapy or targeted therapy, which did not have the definition of measurement methods either. This study evaluates whether clinical imaging findings of sarcoma after preoperative chemotherapy correlate with tumor responses by pathological evaluation by Huvos classifications and develops reliable, quantitative, clinical response criteria.
Detailed description
A total of 1570 lesions were evaluated by clinical imaging including X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scan or PET/CT preoperatively treated with chemotherapy. All patients had surgery in our center and get pathological evaluation by tumor necrosis rate. Statistical diversity analysis was performed by different pathological groups and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves，ROC were done to find the dividing clinical parameters (Cut-off values) to distinguish different pathological groups.The cut-off values of change rate of maximum diameters of tumor located in extremities were 86%, 50.7% and 0.02% for Huvos Ⅳ,Ⅲ,ⅡandⅠgroups. The differentiation was not obvious using bone scan to distinguish different pathological responses. And the cut-off value for SUVmax value for Huvos Ⅲ,ⅡandⅠgroups were 60.7% and 31.4%.After Multidisciplinary discussion in multiple sites of China, we finally designed a evaluation system based on our data. This study is desgined to prospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of this Clinical evaluation of primary sarcoma originated from bone with other clinical evaluation system,such as RECIST 1.1, Choi and PERCIST.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Xijing Hospital
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Peking University People's Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 1\) histologically confirmed high-grade osteosarcoma; * 2\) initially treated in Musculoskeletal Tumor Center of Peking University People's Hospital, Xijing Hospital or The Second Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang Hospital; * 3\) imaging evaluation should be available; * 4\) completed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and at least 8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy; * 5\) expected to live longer than 3 months with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; * 6\) acceptable hematologic, hepatic, and renal function.
Exclusion criteria
* 1\) Patients who could not complete neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or at least 4-month adjuvant chemotherapy; * 2\) lost to follow-up.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 12 months | Sensitivity is defined as the true right clinical evaluated number/ the pathological evaluated number by different classification system. |
| Specificity | 12 months | Specificity is defined as the true wrong clincial evuluated number /the pathological evaluated number by different classification system. |
| Pathological response rate | 12 months | tumor necrosis rate descripted by Huvos |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| progression-free survival | 24 months | Progression-free survival is defined as time from diagnosis to the first occurrence of progression of disease or death from any cause |
| overall survival | 60 months | overall survival is defined as time from diagnosis to death from any cause. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactLu Xie, M.D.
Backup ContactJie Xu, M.D.
Outcome results
None listed