Skip to content

A Low-residue Diet vs Clear Liquid Diet as a Bowel Colonoscopy Preparation With Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)

A Low-residue Diet is a Good Option for Patients With PEG Based Colon Preparation: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03358537
Acronym
PEG
Enrollment
215
Registered
2017-11-30
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2018-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy

Keywords

Dietary fiber

Brief summary

This was a randomized, endoscopists' blinded comparison of bowel colonoscopy cleansing and tolerability of a prespecified low-residue diet compared with a clear liquid diet and Polyethylene Glycol bowel preparation. Outcome measures included efficacy of bowel preparation, patient preparation tolerability and side-effects.

Detailed description

An adequate examination is dependent on the bowel colonoscopy cleansing of stool. There are many different colon preparations, however endoscopists traditionally recommend the patient remain on a clear liquid diet for at least 24 h prior to their colonoscopy to reduce continued residue inflow into the colon from the small bowel, in addition the large volume preparation with PEG. The most common problems leading to less than adequate colon cleansing include lack of compliance with the clear liquid diet and difficulty taking the large volume preparation.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTClear Liquid Diet

Clear liquid diet was compared with low-residue diet, in combination with Poliethylene Glycol in each group

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLow-residue Diet

Clear liquid diet was compared with low-residue diet, in combination with Poliethylene Glycol in each group

Sponsors

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

This was a randomized, endoscopists' blinded comparison of bowel cleanising, tolerability and quality indicators for colonoscopy

Intervention model description

A total of 215 subjects were randomly assigned for this study, 105 in the clear liquid diet and 100 in the low residue-diet, 5 subjects were excluded in each group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Out-patient scheduled for colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects under 18 years of age * Pregnancy * Subjects with decompensated metabolic, renal, cardiac and psychiatric disease * Allergy to PEG * Refuse participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of bowel colonoscopy preparation1 dayThe quality of cleansing was recorded using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), a four-point scoring system applied to each of the three broad regions of the colon (right=cecum and ascending, transverse= including the hepatic and splenic flexures and left=descending, sigmoid and rectum) during withdrawal. The point was assigned as 0= unprepared to 3=entire mucosa of colon segment seen well with no residual staining. Successful colon cleansing was considered when BBPS were \>2 per segment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerability1 dayPatient tolerability was assessed using Viera scale (Likert), which measures the intensity of the symptoms related to the bowel preparation including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, abdominal distension and anal discomfort. The six-point scale ranging from 0-1=no complaints or some; 2-3=moderate and 4-5=severe symptoms.
Satisfaction1 dayData on satisfaction were collected with a 1 to 10 visual analogue scale. Volume PEG consumed were evaluated as quartile (0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) prior colonoscopy.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026