Skip to content

Safety Evaluation of Repeat Placement of the S8 Sinus Implant in Chronic Sinusitis Patients With Nasal Polyps (ENCORE)

The ENCORE Study: Safety Evaluation of Repeat Placement of the Corticosteroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant in Chronic Sinusitis Patients With Nasal Polyps

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03358329
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-11-30
Start date
2017-11-13
Completion date
2019-01-17
Last updated
2019-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyposis

Keywords

corticosteroid, implant

Brief summary

The ENCORE Study is designed to evaluate the repeat administration of the S8 Sinus Implant in chronic sinusitis (CS) patients with recurrent nasal polyps.

Detailed description

The ENCORE Study is a prospective open-label, non-randomized, multicenter study in CS patients who had undergone prior endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) including bilateral total ethmoidectomy and present with bilateral ethmoid polyposis.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTS8 Sinus Implant

In-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (mometasone furoate, 1350 mcg) in the ethmoid sinuses

Sponsors

Intersect ENT
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient has provided written informed consent using a form approved by the reviewing institutional review board (IRB) and sponsor. 2. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age. 3. Patient is willing and able to comply with protocol requirements. 4. Patient has a confirmed diagnosis of CS with nasal polyps, as defined in the 2016 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology. 5. Patient has undergone prior ESS including bilateral total ethmoidectomy at least 90 days prior to screening. 6. Patient has evidence of bilateral ethmoid sinus obstruction due to polyposis warranting intervention (polyp grade ≥ 2 on each side). 7. Patient is able to tolerate daily use of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS). 8. Patient is able to tolerate topical/local anesthesia. 9. In the opinion of the investigator, patient's ethmoid sinus anatomy is amenable to in-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (i.e., able to pass into the middle meatus on both sides the S8 Sinus Implant with 20 mm in nominal length and 7 mm in compressed diameter). 10. Female patients of reproductive potential must not be pregnant or nursing and must agree to not become pregnant during their participation in the study. 11. Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to use consistent and acceptable method(s) of birth control during their participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient has extensive ethmoid sinus polyp grade (grade 4 on at least one side). 2. Patient has extensive adhesions/synechiae (grade 3 or 4). 3. Patient has used parenteral and injected steroids (e.g., Kenalog injection) during 30 days prior to the baseline procedure. 4. Patient has used oral steroids, budesonide or other sinus steroid irrigations/rinses, nebulized steroids administered nasally or budesonide drops during 14 days prior to the baseline procedure. 5. Patient has oral-steroid dependent condition such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. 6. Patient has known history of allergy or intolerance to corticosteroids or mometasone furoate. 7. Patient has used monoclonal antibodies for asthma, allergies or nasal polyps (e.g., Dupixent, Nucala, Xolair) during 30 days prior to the baseline procedure. 8. Patient requires monoclonal antibodies for asthma, allergies or nasal polyps during the duration of the study. 9. Patient has presence of physical obstruction that would preclude access and placement of the S8 Sinus Implant in the middle meatus (e.g., severe septal deviation, septal spur, very small middle meatus, total obstruction of the sinonasal passage with severe adhesion, scarring, polypoid edema or polyps). 10. Patient has known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or immunoglobulin G or A subclass deficiency. 11. Patient has clinical evidence of acute sinusitis (AS), as defined in the 2016 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology. 12. Patient has clinical evidence or suspicion of invasive fungal sinusitis (e.g., bone erosion on prior computed tomography (CT) scan, necrotic sinus tissue). 13. Patient has evidence of severe concomitant disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete assessments during the 365-day study follow-up period (e.g., cancer). 14. Patient is currently participating in another clinical study. 15. Patient has previously undergone ESS and experienced a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak or has residual compromised vision as a result of a complication in a prior ESS procedure. 16. Patient has known dehiscence of the lamina papyracea. 17. Patient has evidence of active tuberculosis or active viral illness (e.g., ocular herpes simplex, chickenpox, measles). 18. Patient has known history or diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension (prior ocular exam with intraocular pressure of \>21 mmHg and pressure lowering medication given) or posterior subcapsular cataract.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Implant-Related Serious Adverse Events365 daysEvaluated via tabulation of implant-related serious adverse events (SAE) reported by subjects between consent and Day 365.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SNOT-22 Total ScoreBaseline, 90 days, 180 daysSino-Nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) is a validated disease-specific symptom-scoring instrument consisting of 22 questions, each scored on a 6-point scale of 0 (no problem) to 5 (probably as bad as it can be) based on the subject's recollection of symptoms over the past 2 weeks. The total score ranges from 0 to 110, with a higher score reflecting greater symptom burden. Change from baseline to 90 days and to 180 days is calculated as the value at 90/180 days minus the value from baseline. Negative values for change from baseline indicate reduction (improvement) in sino-nasal symptoms.
Nasal Obstruction/Congestion ScoreBaseline, 90 days, 180 daysDetermined on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) based on the subject's recollection of symptoms over the past week using a reflective paper questionnaire. Change from baseline to 90 days and to 180 days is calculated as the value at 90/180 days minus the value at baseline. Negative values for change from baseline to follow-up indicate reduction (improvement) in nasal obstruction/congestion.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited at 10 sites across the US between November 2017 and January 2018.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
S8 Sinus Implant
Corticosteroid-eluting Sinus Implant with 1350 mcg of MF Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200 mcg) once daily
50
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicS8 Sinus Implant
Age, Continuous53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.73
Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction73.2 percent of obstruction
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.89
Nasal Obstruction/Congestion ≥ 238 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants
SNOT-2241.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.84

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Implant-Related Serious Adverse Events

Evaluated via tabulation of implant-related serious adverse events (SAE) reported by subjects between consent and Day 365.

Time frame: 365 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
S8 Sinus ImplantNumber of Participants With Implant-Related Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Secondary

Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score

Determined on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) based on the subject's recollection of symptoms over the past week using a reflective paper questionnaire. Change from baseline to 90 days and to 180 days is calculated as the value at 90/180 days minus the value at baseline. Negative values for change from baseline to follow-up indicate reduction (improvement) in nasal obstruction/congestion.

Time frame: Baseline, 90 days, 180 days

Population: Analysis population includes subjects with available data at that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
S8 Sinus ImplantNasal Obstruction/Congestion ScoreChange from baseline to Day 90-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
S8 Sinus ImplantNasal Obstruction/Congestion ScoreChange from baseline to Day 180-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Secondary

SNOT-22 Total Score

Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) is a validated disease-specific symptom-scoring instrument consisting of 22 questions, each scored on a 6-point scale of 0 (no problem) to 5 (probably as bad as it can be) based on the subject's recollection of symptoms over the past 2 weeks. The total score ranges from 0 to 110, with a higher score reflecting greater symptom burden. Change from baseline to 90 days and to 180 days is calculated as the value at 90/180 days minus the value from baseline. Negative values for change from baseline indicate reduction (improvement) in sino-nasal symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, 90 days, 180 days

Population: Analysis population includes subjects with available data at that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
S8 Sinus ImplantSNOT-22 Total ScoreChange from baseline to Day 90-14.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.27
S8 Sinus ImplantSNOT-22 Total ScoreChange from baseline to Day 180-15.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.36

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026